Science as a history of corrected mistakes

American Psychologist

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 657-658

  Wood, James M ^a   Nezworski, M Teresa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; HISTORY; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SCIENCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGY; SCIENCE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 25844475253     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.657     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Grove, W. M., & Stejskal, W. J. (2001). Toward a resolution of the Rorschach controversy. Psychological Assessment, 13, 433-448.
2. Haack, S. (2003). Defending science - within reason: Between scientism and cynicism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
3. Hiller, J. B., Rosenthal, R., Bornstein, R. F., Berry, D. T. R., & Brunell-Neuleib, S. (1999). A comparative meta-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity. Psychological Assessment, 11, 278-296.
4. Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2000). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59-82.
5. Sagan, C. (1995). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. New York: Random House.
6. Westen, D., & Weinberger, J. (2004). When clinical description becomes statistical prediction. American Psychologist, 59, 595-613.
7. Wood, J. M., Garb, H. N., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Nezworski, M. T. (2002). Clinical assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 519-543.