Does gender matter in valuation studies? Evidence from three forestry applications

Forestry

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 239-248

  Farreras, Verónica ^a   Riera, Pere ^a   Mogas, Joan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; GENDER; VALUATION;

EID: 25844431569     PISSN: 0015752X     EISSN: 14643626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpi022     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Berrens, R.P., Bohara, A.K. and Kerkvliet, J. 1997 A randomized response approach to dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 79, 252-266.
2. Brown, K.M. and Taylor, L.O. 2000 Do as you say, say as you do: evidence on gender differences in actual and stated contributions to public goods. J. Econ. Behav. Organiz. 43, 127-139.
3. Cameron, T.A. and Englin, J. 1997 Respondent experience and contingent valuation of environmental goods. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 33, 296-313.
4. Diamond, P.A. and Hausman J.A. 1994 Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? J. Econ. Perspect. 8 (4), 45-64.
5. Dupont, D.P 2000 Gender and willingness to pay for recreational benefits from water quality improvements. Microbehavior and Macroresults: Proceedings of the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute for Fisheries Economics and Trade. Corvallis, OR.
6. Hanemann, W.M. 1994 Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J. Econ. Perspect. 8 (4), 19-43.
7. Hanemann, W.M. and Kanninen, B. 1999 The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data. In Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC, and Developing Countries. I. Bateman and K.G. Willis (eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, Ch. 11.
8. Loomis, J.B. and Lee, A.I. 2000 Willingness to pay for environmental risk reduction: are there gender differences? Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University. Unpublished.
9. Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. 1989 Using Surveys to Value Public Goods. The Contingent Valuation Method. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
10. Mogas, J., Riera, P. and Bennett, J. 2002 A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling: estimating the environment values of Catalonian forests. Environmental Management Development Occasional Papers No. 1. National Centre for Development Studies, Australian National University, Canberra.
11. Riera, P. and Mogas, J. 2004 Evaluation of risk reduction in forest fires in a Mediterranean region. For. Policy Econ. 6, 521-528.
12. Riera, P., Arqueros, M. and Farreras, V. 2004 Una Valoración de Servicios Forestales Ambientales en Cataluña. Department of Applied Economics, Autonomous University of Barcelona. Unpublished.
13. Swallow, S.K., Weaver, T., Opaluch, J.J. and Michelman, T.S. 1994 Heterogeneous preferences and aggregation in environmental policy analysis: a landfill siting case. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 76, 431-443.