Finding cancer biomarkers from mass spectrometry data by decision lists

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 971-979

  Liu, Jian ^a   Li, Ming ^b,c,d  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^d TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Biomarkers; Cancer diagnosis; Decision lists; Machine learning; Mass spectrometry

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GROWTH; DECISION MAKING; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MEDICAL EXPERT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; SURFACE ENHANCED LASER DESORPTION IONIZATION TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 25644458596     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2005.12.971     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Adam, B.L., Qu, Y., et al. 2002. Serum protein fingerprinting coupled with a pattern-matching algorithm distinguishes prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia and healthy men. Cancer Res. 62, 3609-3614.
2. Ball, G., Richie, J., Ahmann, F., et al. 2002. An integrated approach utilizing artificial neural networks and SELDI mass spectrometry for the classification of human tumors and rapid identification of potential biomarkers. Bioinformatics 18, 395-404.
3. Chen, Y., Zheng, S., Yu, J., and Hu, X. 2004. Artificial neural networks analysis of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectra of serum protein pattern distinguishes colorrectal cancer from healthy population. Clinical Cancer Research 10, 8380-8385.
4. Clinical Proteomics Program Databank. 2003. www.clinicalproteomics.steem. com.
5. Conrads, T.P., Zhou, M., Petricoin, E.F., et al. 2003. Cancer diagnosis using proteomic patterns. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 3(4), 411-420.
6. Cristianini, N., and Shawe-Tayer, J. 2000. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Machine Learning Methods, Cambridge University Press, London.
7. Goodacre, R., Heald, J., and Kelly, D. 1999. Characterization of intact microorganism using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. FEMS Microbiology Letters 176, 17-24.
8. Hanash, S. 2003. Disease proteomics. Nature 422, 226-232.
9. Hancock, T., Jiang, T., Li, M., and Tromp, J. 1996. Lower bounds on learning decision lists and trees. Information and Computation 126(2), 114-122.
10. Li, J., Zhang, Z., Rosenweig, J., Wang, Y.Y., and Chan, D.W. 2002. Proteomics and bioinformatics approaches for identification of serum biomarkers to detect breast cancer. Clinical Chem. 48, 1296-1304.
11. Lilien, R.H., Farid, H., and Donald, B.R. 2003. Probabilistic disease classification of expression-dependent proteomic data from mass spectrometry of human serum. J. Comp. Biol. 10, 925-946.
12. Liu, Q., Krishnapuram, B., Pratapa, P., et al. 2003. Identification of differentially expressed proteins using MALDI-TOF mass spectra. Proc. of Biological Aspects of Signal Processing.
13. Miketova, P., Abbas-Hawka, C., and Hadfield, T. 2003. Microorganism gram-type differentiation of whole cells based on pyrolysis high-resolution mass spectrometry data. J Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 67, 109-122.
14. Petricoin, E.F., Ardekani, A.M., Hitt, B.A., et al. 2002. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lacent 359, 572-577.
15. Rivest, R.L. 1987. Learning decision lists. Machine Learning 2(3), 229-246.
16. Valiant, L.G. 1984. A theory of the learnable. Comm. of the ACM 27(11), 1134-1142.
17. Wagner, M., Naik, D., and Pothen, A. 2003. Protocols for disease classification from mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 3, 1692-1698.
18. Wagner, M., Naik, D., Pothen, A., et al. 2004. Computational protein biomarker prediction: A case study for prostate cancer. BMC Bioinformatics 5.
19. Xiong, X., Fang, X., and Zhao, J. 2001. Biomarker identification by feature wrappers. Genome Res. 11, 1878-1887.