Modelling the establishment and spread of autotetraploid plants in a spatially heterogeneous environment

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 562-573

  Li, B H ^a,c   Xu, X M ^a   Ridout, M S ^b  

^a HORTICULTURE RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^c QINGDAO AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Diploid; Evolution; Modelling; Pollen seed dispersal; Polyploids

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EVOLUTION; HETEROGENEITY; POLLEN; SEED DISPERSAL;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; GERM CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PLOIDY; REPRODUCTION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GERM CELLS; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTS; PLOIDIES; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 2342641630     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00700.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bayer, R.J., Purdy, B.G. & Lebedyk, D.G. 1991. Niche differentiation among 8 sexual species of Antennaria Gaertber (Asteraceae, Inuleae) and A. rosea, their allopolyploid derivative. Evol. Trends Plants 5: 90-123.
2. Bever, J.D. & Felber, F. 1992. The theoretical population genetics of autopolyploidy. In: Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology (J. Antonivics & D. Futuyma, eds), pp. 185-217. Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Burton, T.L. & Husband, B.C. 1999. Population cytotype structure in the polyploid Galex urceolata (Diapensiaceae). Heredity 82: 381-390.
4. Burton, T.L. & Husband, B.C. 2000. Fitness difference among diploid autotetraploid, and their triploid progeny in Chamerion angustifolium: mechanisms of inviability and implications for polyploid evolution. Evolution 54: 1182-1191.
5. Felber, F. 1991. Establishment of an autotetraploid cytotype in a diploid population: effect of relative fitness of the cytotype. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 4: 195-207.
6. Felber, F. & Bever, J.D. 1997. Effect of triploid fitness on the coexistence of diploids and autotetraploids. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60: 95-106.
7. Felber-Girard, M., Felber, F. & Buttler, A. 1996. Habitat differentiation in a narrow hybrid zone between diploid and autotetraploid Anthoxanthum alpinum. New Phytol. 133: 531-540.
8. Fowler, N.L. & Levin, D.A. 1984. Ecological constraints on the establishment of a novel polyploid in competition with its progenitor. Am. Nat. 124: 703-711.
9. Hardy, O.J., Vanderhoeven, S., De Loose, M. & Meerts, P. 2000. Ecological, morphological and allozymic differentiation between diploid and autotetraploid knapweeds (Cenaurea jacea) from a contact zone in the Belgian Ardennes. New Phytol. 146: 281-290.
10. Husband, B.C. & Schemske, D.W. 1997. The effect of inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid populations of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae): implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Evolution 51: 737-746.
11. Jackson, R.C. & Jackson, J.W. 1996. Gene segregation in autotetraploids: prediction from meiotic configurations. Am. J. Bot. 83: 673-678.
12. Jay, M., Reynaud, J., Blaiss, S. & Cartier, D. 1991. Evolution and differentiation of Lotus corniculatus/Lotus alpinus populations from French South-Western Alps. III. Conclusions. Evol. Trends Plants 5: 157-160.
13. Levin, D.A. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant population. Taxon 24: 35-43.
14. Lumaret, R., Guillerm, J.L., Delay, J., Ait Lhaj Loufti, A., Izco, J. & Jay, M. 1987. Polyploidy and habitat differentiation in Dactylis glomerata L. from Galicia (Spain). Oecologia 73: 209-220.
15. Nesom, G.L. 1983. Galax (Diapensiaceae): geographical variation in chromosome number. Syst. Bot. 8: 1-14.
16. Ramsey, J. & Schemske, D.W. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 467-501.
17. Rodriguez, D.J. 1996a. A model for the establishment of polyploidy in plants. Am. Nat. 147: 33-46.
18. Rodriguez, D.J. 1996b. A model for the establishment of the polyploidy in plants: viable but fertile hybrids, iteroparity, and demographic stochasticity. J. Theor. Biol. 180: 189-196.
19. Stace, C.A. 1993. The importance of rare events in polyploid evolution. In: Evolutionary Patterns and Processes (D. R. Lees & D. Edwards, eds), pp. 157-169. Academic Press, London.
20. Tilman, D. & Kareiva, P. (eds) 1997. Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Monographs in Population Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
21. Wichmann, B.A. & Hill, I.D. 1982. An efficient and portable pseudo-random number generator. Appl. Stat. 31: 188-190.