Aging, stem cells and tissue regeneration: Lessons from muscle

Cell Cycle

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 407-410

  Conboy, Irina M ^a,c   Rando, Thomas A ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c University of California at Berkeley   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Muscle; Notch; Parabiosis; Regeneration; Satellite cell; Serum factors; Stem cell

Indexed keywords

DELTA OPIATE RECEPTOR; LIGAND; NOTCH RECEPTOR;

AGING; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL AGING; CELL ASSAY; CELL FATE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL REGENERATION; ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INJURY; MUSCLE; NONHUMAN; PARABIOSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REVIEW; SATELLITE CELL; SERUM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SKELETAL MUSCLE; STEM CELL; TISSUE REGENERATION; TISSUE REPAIR; TISSUE SPECIFICITY; UPREGULATION;

EID: 25444478907     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.4.3.1518     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Sohal RS, Mockett RJ, Orr WC. Mechanisms of aging: An appraisal of the oxidative stress hypothesis. Free Radic Biol Med 2002; 33:575-86.
2. Ames BN. Delaying the mitochondrial decay of aging. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004; 1019:406-11.
3. Thomas DR. Age-related changes in wound healing. Drugs Aging 2001; 18:607-20.
4. Edelberg JM, Reed MJ. Aging and angiogenesis. Front Biosci 2003; 8:s1199-209.
5. Franklin RJ, Zhao C, Sim FJ. Ageing and CNS remyelination. Neuroreport 2002; 13:923-8.
6. Young HE, Duplaa C, Romero-Ramos M, Chesselet MF, Vourc'h P, Yost MJ, Ericson K, Terracio L, Asahara T, Masuda H, Tamura-Ninomiya S, Detmer K, Bray RA, Steele TA, Hixson D, el-Kalay M, Tobin BW, Russ RD, Horst MN, Floyd JA, Henson NL, Hawkins KC, Groom J, Parikh A, Blake L, Bland LJ, Thompson AJ, Kirincich A, Moreau C, Hudson J, Bowyer FP 3rd, Lin TJ, Black AC Jr.. Adult reserve stem cells and their potential for tissue engineering. Cell Biochem Biophys 2004; 40:1-80.
7. Morrison SJ, Wandycz AM, Akashi K, Globerson A, Weissman IL. The aging of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med 1996; 2:1011-6.
8. Martin K, Potten CS, Roberts SA, Kirkwood TB. Altered stem cell regeneration in irradiated intestinal crypts of senescent mice. J Cell Sci 1998; 111:2297-303.
9. Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Smythe GM, Rando TA. Notch-mediated restoration of regenerative potential to aged muscle. Science 2003; 302:1575-7.
10. Capogrossi MC. Cardiac stem cells fail with aging: A new mechanism for the age-dependent decline in cardiac function. Circ Res 2004; 94:411-3.
11. Kuhn HG, Dickinson-Anson H, Gage FH. Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: Age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation. J Neurosci 1996; 16:2027-33.
12. Grounds MD. Age-associated changes in the response of skeletal muscle cells to exercise and regeneration. Ann NY Acad Sci 1998; 854:78-91.
13. Zammit PS, Heslop L, Hudon V, Rosenblatt JD, Tajbakhsh S, Buckingham ME, Beauchamp JR, Partridge TA. Kinetics of myoblast proliferation show that resident satellite cells are competent to fully regenerate skeletal muscle fibers. Exp Cell Res 2002; 281:39-49.
14. Zammit PS, Golding JP, Nagata Y, Hudon V, Partridge TA, Beauchamp JR. Muscle satellite cells adopt divergent fates: A mechanism for self-renewal? J Cell Biol 2004; 166:347-57.
15. Beauchamp JR, Heslop L, Yu DS, Tajbakhsh S, Kelly RG, Wernig A, Buckingham ME, Partridge TA, Zammit PS. Expression of CD34 and Myf5 defines the majority of quiescent adult skeletal muscle satellite cells. J Cell Biol 2000; 151:1221-34.
16. Seale P, Sabourin LA, Girgis-Gabardo A, Mansouri A, Gruss P, Rudnicki MA. Pax7 is required for the specification of myogenic satellite cells. Cell 2000; 102:777-86.
17. Cornelison DD, Filla MS, Stanley HM, Rapraeger AC, Olwin BB. Syndecan-3 and syndecan-4 specifically mark skeletal muscle satellite cells and are implicated in satellite cell maintenance and muscle regeneration. Dev Biol 2001; 239:79-94.
18. Sherwood RI, Christensen JL, Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Rando TA, Weissman IL, Wagers AJ. Isolation of adult mouse myogenic progenitors: Functional heterogeneity of cells within and engrafting skeletal muscle. Cell 2004; 119:543-54.
19. Schultz E, Lipton BH. Skeletal muscle satellite cells: Changes in proliferation potential as a function of age. Mech Ageing Dev 1982; 20:377-83.
20. Bockhold KJ, Rosenblatt JD, Partridge TA. Aging normal and dystrophic mouse muscle: Analysis of myogenicity in cultures of living single fibers. Muscle Nerve 1998; 21:173-83.
21. Renault V, Thornell LE, Eriksson PO, Butler-Browne G, Mouly V, Thorne LE. Regenerative potential of human skeletal muscle during aging. Aging Cell 2002; 1:132-9.
22. Gibson MC, Schultz E. Age-related differences in absolute numbers of skeletal muscle satellite cells. Muscle Nerve 1983; 6:574-80.
23. Charge SB, Rudnicki MA. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiol Rev 2004; 84:209-38.
24. Conboy IM, Rando TA. The regulation of Notch signaling controls satellite cell activation and cell fate determination in postnatal myogenesis. Dev Cell 2002; 3:397-409.
25. Zacks SI, Sheff MR Age-related impeded regeneration of mouse minced anterior tibial muscle. Muscle Nerve 1982; 5:152-61.
26. Carlson BM, Faulkner JA. Muscle transplantation between young and old rats: Age of host determines recovery. Am J Physiol 1989; 256:C1262-6.
27. Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Wagers AJ, Girma ER, Weissman IL, Rando TA. Rejuvenation of aged progenitor cells by exposure to a youthful systemic environment. Nature 2005; 433: 760-4.