Increased risk of postoperative neurologic deficit for spinal surgery patients with unobtainable intraoperative evoked potential data

Spine

Volumn 30, Issue 18, 2005, Pages 2094-2103

  Thuet, Earl D ^a   Padberg, Anne M ^a   Raynor, Barry L ^a   Bridwell, Keith H ^a   Daniel Riew, K ^a   Taylor, Brett A ^a   Lenke, Lawrence G ^a,b  

^a BJC HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^b BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional neurologic integrity; Neurogenic mixed evoked potential; Somatosensory evoked potential; Stagnara wake up test

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE STAGNARA WAKE UP TEST; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PARAPLEGIA; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPINE SURGERY; TIBIAL NERVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULNAR NERVE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINE;

EID: 25444471063     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000178845.61747.6a     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Haghighi SS, York DH, Gaines RW, et al. Monitoring of motor tracts with spinal cord stimulation. Spine 1994;19:1518-23.
2. Dawson EG, Sherman JE, Kanim LEA, et al. Spinal cord monitoring: results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey. Spine 1991;16(suppl):361-4.
3. Nagle KJ, Emerson RG, Adams DC, et al. Intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials: a review of 116 cases. Neurology 1996;47:999-1004.
4. Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, et al. Somatosensory- and motor evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery: an accepted standard of care. Spine 1998;23:1392-400.
5. Padberg AM, Bridwell KH. Spinal cord monitoring: current state of the art. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:407-33.
6. Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Turner LA, et al. Neurophysiological identification of iatrogenic neural injury during complex spinal surgery. Semin Spine Surg 1998;10:242-51.
7. Nash CL, Brown RH. Current concepts review: spinal cord monitoring. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:627-30.
8. Helmers SL, Hall JE. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in pediatrics. J Pediatric Orthop 1994;14:592-8.
9. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;96:6-11.
10. Owen JH, Sponseller PD, Syzmanski J, et al. Efficacy of multi-modality spinal cord monitoring during surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 1995;20:1480-8.
11. Wilson-Holden TJ, Padberg AM, Lenke LG, et al. Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring for pediatric patients with spinal cord pathology undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Spine 1999;24:1685-92.
12. Ashkenaze D, Mudiyam R, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Efficacy of spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 1993;18:1627-33.
13. Lubicky JP, Spadaro JA, Yuan HA, et al. Variability of somatosensory cortical evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery. Spine 1989;14:790-8.
14. Padberg AM, Russo, MH, Lenke LG, et al. Validity and reliability of spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular spinal deformity surgery: J Spinal Disord 1996;9:150-8.
15. Keith RW, Stambough JL, Awender SH. Somatosensory cortical evoked potentials: a review of 100 cases of intraoperative spinal surgery monitoring. J Spinal Disord 1990;3:220-6.
16. Nuwer MR. Spinal cord monitoring. In: Nuwer MR, ed. Evoked Potential Monitoring in the Operating Room. New York: Raven Press, 1986;49-142.
17. Noordeen MH, Lee J, Gibbons CE, et al. Spinal cord monitoring in operations for neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:53-7.
18. Vaquzelle C, Stagnara P, Jourinoux P. Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 1973;93:173-8.
19. Harner PF, Sannit T. A Review of the International Ten-Twenty System of Electrode Placement. Quincy, MA: Grass Instrument, 1974.
20. Jasper HH. Report of Committee on Methods of Clinical Examination in EEG: the ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation [Appendix]. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958;10:371.
21. Banoub M, Tetzlaff JE, Schubert. Pharmacologic and physiologic influences affecting sensory evoked potentials. Anesthesiology 2003;99:716-37.
22. Yamada H, Transfedlt EE, Tamaki T, et al. The effects of volatile anesthetics on the relative amplitudes and latencies of spinal and muscle potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Spine 1997;22:1970-5.
23. Able MF, Mubavak SJ, Wenser OR, et al. Brainstem evoked potentials for scoliosis surgery: a reliable method allowing use of halogenated anesthetic agents. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10:208-13.
24. Haghighi SS, Madsen R, Gree KD, et al. Suppression of motor evoked potentials by inhalation anesthetics. J Neurosurg Aneth 1990;2:73-8.
25. Peterson DO, Drummond JC, Todd MM. Effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, and nitrous oxide on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Anesthesiology 1986;65:35-40.
26. Madson DG, Higgins D, Boyd SG, et al. Sequential measurement of the median nerve somatosensory evoked potential during isoflurane anesthesia in children. Br J Anaesth 1992;69:567-69.
27. Erwin CW, Erwin AC. Up and down the spinal cord: intraoperative monitoring of sensory and motor spinal cord pathways. J Clin Neurophysiol 1993;10:425-36.