Post-it® note persuasion: A sticky influence

Journal of Consumer Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 230-237

  Garner, Randy ^a  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444460400     PISSN: 10577408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1503_8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1988). The feature-positive effect, attitude strength, and degree of perceived consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 231-241.
2. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
3. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
4. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Cialdini, R., & Trost, M. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Cioffi, D., & Garner, R. (1996). On doing the decision: Effects of active versus passive choice on commitment and self-perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 133-147.
7. Cioffi, D., & Garner, R. (1998). The effect of response options on decisions and subsequent behavior: Sometimes inaction is better. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 463-472.
8. Fazio, R., Sherman, S., & Herr, P. (1982). The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 404-411.
9. Garner, R. (2004). Persuasive influence of name similarity and familiarity on likeability. Unpublished manuscript, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX.
10. Garner, R. (2005). What's in a name? Persuasion perhaps. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 108-116.
11. Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
12. Hoffman, M. (1981). Is altruism a part of human nature? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40,121-131.
13. Kanner, B. (1989, April 3). Color schemes. New York Magazine, 22-23.
14. Kunz, P., & Woolcott, M. (1976). Season's greetings: From my status to yours. Social Science Research, 5, 269-278.
15. Langer, E. J. (1989). Minding matter: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. In Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 137-174). San Diego, CA: Academic.
16. Langer, E., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of "placebic" information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 635-642.
17. Langer, E., & Moldoveanu, M. (2000). Mindfulness research and the future. Journal of Social Sciences, 56, 129-139.
18. Lewis, D., & Bridger, D. (2000). The soul of the new consumer: Authenticity - what we buy and why in the new economy. London: Brealey.
19. Milgram, S., & Sabini, J. (1983). On maintaining social norms: A field experiment in the subway. In H. H. Blumberg, A. P. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interactions (Vol. 1). London: Wiley.
20. Regan, D. (1971). Effect of a favor and liking on compliance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 627-639.
21. Schiffman, L., & Kanuk, L. (2004). Consumer behavior (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
22. Solomon, M (2004). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
23. 3M. (2004). Post-it® note history. Retrieved March 2004, from http://www.3m.com.
24. Whatley, M., Webster, J., Smith, R., & Rhodes, A. (1999). The effect of a favor on public and private compliance: How internalized is the norm of reciprocity? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 251-259.