Growth in commuting distances in French polycentric metropolitan areas: Paris, Lyon and Marseille

Urban Studies

Volumn 42, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1537-1547

  Aguilera, Anne ^a  

^a Universite Paris Est   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUTING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GROWTH RATE; METROPOLITAN AREA; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

BOUCHES-DU-RHONE; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; ILE-DE-FRANCE; LYONS; MARSEILLES; PARIS; PROVENCE-ALPES-COTE D'AZUR; RHONE; RHONE-ALPES; VILLE-DE-PARIS; WESTERN EUROPE; WORLD;

EID: 25444454318     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00420980500185389     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aguilera, A. and Mignot, D. (2002) Structure des localisations intra-urbaines et mobilité domicile-travail, Recherche Transport Sécurité, 77, pp. 311-325.
2. Aguilera, A. and Mignot, D. (2003) Estrategias de localizacion de las empresas y dinamicas urbanas. el caso de Lyon, in: D. Villareal Gonzalez, D. Mignot and D. Hiernaux (Eds) Dinamicas metropolitanas y estructuracion territorial: Estudio Comparativo Mexico-Francia, pp. 39-56. Mexico City: Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana.
3. Anas, A., Arnott, R. and Small, K. A. (1998) Urban spatial structure, Journal of Economic Literature, 36, pp. 1426-1464.
4. Banister, D., Watson, S. and Wood, C. (1997) Sustainable cities, transport, energy and urban form, Environment and Planning B, 24, pp. 125-143.
5. Berroir, S., Mathian, H. and Saint-Julien, T. (2002) Déplacements domicile-travail: vers le polycentrisme, INSEE Ile-de-France Regards, 54, pp. 5-8.
6. Bourne, L. S. (1989) Are new urban forms emerging? Empirical tests for Canadian urban areas, The Canadian Geographer, 4, pp. 312-328.
7. Cervero, R. and Kockelman, K. (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design, Transportation Research D, 3, pp. 199-219.
8. Cervero, R. and Wu, K. L. (1997) Polycentrism, commuting and residential location in the San Francisco Bay area, Environment and Planning A, 29, pp. 865-886.
9. Clark, W. A. and Kuijpers-Linde, M. (1994) Commuting in restructuring urban regions, Urban Studies, 31, pp. 465-483.
10. Dubin, R. (1991) Commuting patterns and firm decentralization, Land Economics, 1, pp. 15-29.
11. Fujita, M. and Ogawa, H. (1982) Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 12, pp. 161-196.
12. Gallez, C. and Orfeuil, J.-P. (1998) Dis moi où tu habites, je te dirai comment tu te déplaces, in: D. Pumain and M. F. Mattei (Eds) Données urbaines 2, pp. 157-164. Paris: Anthropos, Economica.
13. Gaschet, F. (2002) The new intraurban dynamics: suburbanisation and functional specialization in French cities, Papers in Regional Science, 1, pp. 63-81.
14. Giuliano, G. and Small, K. A. (1991) Subcenters in the Los Angeles region, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2, pp. 163-182.
15. Giuliano, G. and Small, K. A. (1993) Is the journey to work explained by urban structure?, Urban Studies, 30, pp. 1485-1500.
16. Gordon, P. and Richardson, H. W. (1996) Beyond polycentricity. The dispersed metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970-1990, Journal of the American Planning Association, 3, pp. 289-295.
17. Gordon, P., Richardson, H. W. and Jun, M. I. (1991) The commuting paradox: evidence from the top twenty, Journal of the American Planning Association, 4, pp. 416-420.
18. Gordon, P., Richardson, H. W. and Wong, H. L. (1986) The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: the case of Los Angeles, Environment and Planning A, 18, pp. 161-173.
19. Hamilton, B. (1982) Wasteful commuting, Journal of Political Economy, 5, pp. 1035-1053.
20. Handy, S. (1996) Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior, Transportation Research D, 2, pp. 151-165.
21. Laan, N. van der (1998) Changing urban systems: an empirical analysis at two spatial levels, Regional Studies, 32, pp. 235-247.
22. Levine, J. C. (1992) Decentralization of jobs and emerging suburban commute, Transportation Research Record, 1364, pp. 71-80.
23. Levine, J. C. (1999) Access to choice, Access, 14, pp. 16-19.
24. Massot, M. H. and Roy, E. (2004) Lieu de vie-Lieu de travail: 25 ans d'évolution de la distance au travail, rapport INRETS, Arcueil.
25. McDonald, J. F. (1987) The identification of urban employment subcenters, Journal of Urban Economics, 21, pp. 242-258.
26. McMillen, D. P. and Smith, S. C. (2003) The number of subcenters in large urban areas, Journal of Urban Economics, 53, pp. 321-338.
27. Priemus, H., Nijkamp, P. and Banister, D. (2001) Mobility and spatial dynamics: an uneasy relationship, Journal of Transport Geography, 9, pp. 167-171.
28. Richardson, H. W. (1988) Monocentric vs. polycentric models: the future of urban economics in regional science, Annals of Regional Science, 2, pp. 1-12.
29. Sasaki, K. (1990) The establishment of a subcenter and urban spatial structure, Environment and Planning A, 22, pp. 369-383.
30. Sasaki, K. and Mun, S.-E. (1996) A dynamic analysis of multiple-center formation in a city, Journal of Urban Economics, 40, pp. 257-278.
31. Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F. M. and Dijst, M. (2001) Travel behavior in Dutch monocentric and polycentric urban systems, Journal of Transport Geography, 9, pp. 173-186.
32. Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F. M. and Dijst M. (2002) The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behaviour in the Netherlands: a multilevel approach. Paper presented to the 42nd ERSA Congress, Dortmund.
33. Sultana, S. (2000) Some effects of employment centers on commuting times in the Atlanta metropolitan area, 1990, Southeastern Geographer, 2, pp. 225-233.
34. Talbot, J. (2001) Les déplacements domicile-travail: de plus en plus d'actifs travaillent loin de chez eux, Insee Première, 767.
35. Wachs, M., Taylor, B. D., Levine, N. and Ong, P. (1993) The changing commute: a case-study of the jobs-housing relationship over time, Urban Studies, 30, pp. 1711-1729.