Constructing political logic: The democratic peace puzzle

Journal of Conflict Resolution

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 430-454

  Zinnes, Dina A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Democratic peace; Logic; Prepositional calculus

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542590063     PISSN: 00220027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022002704264213     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brecher, Michael, and Jonthan Wilkenfeld. 1997. A study of crisis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2. Bremer, Stuart. 1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution 26:309-41.
3. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James Morrow, Randolph Siverson, and Alastair Smith. 1999. An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review 93 (December): 791-807.
4. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph Siverson, and James Morrow. 2003. The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Cederman, Lars Erik. 2001. Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the democratic peace as a collective learning process. American Political Science Review 95:15-32.
6. Dixon, William. 1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review 88 (March): 14-32.
7. Eyerman, Joe, and Robert A. Hart, Jr. 1996. An empirical test of the audience cost proposition. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (December): 597-616.
8. Farber, Henry S., and Joanne Gowa. 1995. Polities and peace. International Security 20 (Fall): 123-46.
9. Fearon, James. 1994. Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (September): 577-92.
10. Gleditsch, Nils Petter, and Havard Hegre. 1997. Peace and democracy: Three levels of analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (April): 283-310.
11. Goble, George Washington. 1946. The design of democracy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
12. Gurr, Ted Robert, Keith Jaggers, and Will Moore. 1989. Polity II handbook. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
13. Layne, Christopher. 1994. Kant or can't: The myth of the democratic peace. International Security 19 (Fall): 5-49.
14. Lipson, Charles. 2003. Reliable partners: How democracies have made a separate peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Maoz, Zeev. 1998. Realist and cultural critiques of the democratic peace: A theoretical and empirical reassessment. International Interactions 24 (1): 3-89.
16. Maoz, Zeev, and Nazrin Abdolali. 1989. Regime types and international conflict, 1816-1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution 33 (March): 3-36.
17. Maoz, Zeev, and Bruce Russett. 1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review 87 (September): 624-38.
18. Morgan, T. Clifton, and Valerie L. Schwebach. 1992. Take two democracies and call me in the morning: A prescription for peace? International Interactions 17 (4): 305-20.
19. Mousseau, Michael. 1998. Democracy and compromise in militarized interstate conflicts, 1816 - 1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (April): 210-30.
20. Oneal, John R., and Bruce M. Russett. 1997. The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence and conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly 41 (June): 267-93.
21. Ray, James Lee. 1995. Democracy in international conflict. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
22. Raymond, Gregory A. 1994. Democracies, disputes, and third-party intermediaries. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (March): 24-42.
23. Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam. 2002. Democracies at war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Rosato, Sebastian. 2003. The flawed logic of democratic peace theory. American Political Science Review 97 (November): 585-602.
25. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1762] 1987. On the social contract. Trans. and ed. Donald A. Cress. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
26. Russett, Bruce M. 1995. Grasping the democratic peace. Princeton, NJ; Princeton University Press.
27. Schultz, Kenneth A. 2001. Democracy and coercive diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Schwartz, Thomas, and Kiron Skinner. 1997. Democracy and the paradox of perpetual peace. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August, Washington, DC.
29. Spiro, David. 1994. The insignificance of the liberal peace. International Security 19 (Fall): 50-86.
30. Starr, Harvey. 1992. Why don't democracies fight one another? Evaluating the theory-findings feedback loop. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations 14:41-59.