Clinical evaluation of the Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 323-333

  Dave, Trusit ^a   Fukuma, Yasufumi ^b  

^a Topcon Corporation ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b TOPCON CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Automated subjective refraction; Autorefraction; Repeatability

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; DATA REDUCTION; REFRACTION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

AUTOREFRACTION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CYCLOPLEGIA;

VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EYE REFRACTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 2542561346     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000134906.98403.c3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Dyer AM, Kirk AH. A fully automated remote refraction system. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6(Suppl 2):S16-8.
2. Marg E, Anderson KW, Chung KO, Neroth CC. Computer-assisted eye examination. VI. Identification and correction of errors in the Refractor III system for subjective examination. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978;55:249-66.
3. ISO 5725-1:1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - part 1. General principles and definitions. Geneva: International Standards Organization, 1994.
4. Dave T. BV-1000 Automated Subjective Refraction System: description and patient perceptions. Optometry Today 2003;4:52-7.
5. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:367-75.
6. Raasch TW, Schechtman KB, Davis LJ, Zadnik K. Repeatability of subjective refraction in myopic and keratoconic subjects: results of vector analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21:376-83.
7. Harris WF. Representation of dioptric power in Euclidean 3-space. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1991;11:130-6.
8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
9. Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Tsujimura S. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21:101-7.
10. Chat SW, Edwards MH. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21:87-100.
11. Harvey EM, Miller JM, Wagner LK, Dobson V. Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements with a hand held autorefractor in children. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:941-8.
12. McCaghrey GE, Matthews FE. Clinical evaluation of a range of autorefractors. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1993;13:129-37.
13. Elliott M, Simpson T, Richter D, Fonn D. Repeatability and accuracy of automated refraction: a comparison of the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek AR-1000, and subjective refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74:434-8.
14. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Adams AJ. The repeatability of measurement of the ocular components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33: 2325-33.
15. Rosenfield M, Chiu NN. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:577-9.
16. Bullimore MA, Fusaro RE, Adams CW. The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:617-22.