Evaluation of an automated subjective refractor

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 334-340

  Sheedy, James ^a   Schanz, Paul ^a   Bullimore, Mark ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auto refraction; Automated refraction; Refraction; Visual acuity

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; CALIBRATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; REFRACTION;

CLINICIANS; REFRACTORS; VISUAL ACUITY;

VISION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; DEVICE; EYE REFRACTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISION TESTS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 2542555121     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000134907.06027.b0     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Pappas CJ, Anderson DR, Briese FW. Is the Autorefractor reading closest to manifest refraction? A comparison of the patient's previous spectacles and the 6600 Autorefractor reading. Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:997-8.
2. Drance SM, Mitchell DW, Schulzer M. Studies of an automatic refraction machine. Can J Ophthalmol 1975;10:462-8.
3. Bannon RE. A new automated subjective optometer. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977;54:433-8.
4. Wong EK Jr, Patella VM, Pratt MV, Myers SW, Gaster RN, Leopold IH. Clinical evaluation of the Humphrey automatic refractor. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:870-5.
5. Goss DA, Grosvenor T. Reliability of refraction - a literature review. J Am Optom Assoc 1996;67:619-30.
6. McBrien NA, Millodot M. Clinical evaluation of the Canon Autoref R-1. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985;62:786-92.
7. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Adams AJ. The repeatability of measurement of the ocular components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33: 2325-33.
8. Bullimore MA, Fusaro RE, Adams CW. The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:617-22.
9. Allen PM, Radhakrishnan H, O'Leary DJ. Repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an adult population with healthy eyes. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:245-51.
10. Bullimore MA, Adams CW, Fusaro RE, Bauman M, Cotteral RM, Ng Sarver J, Twelker D, Graham AD. Patient acceptance of autorefractor and clinician prescriptions: a randomized clinical trial. In: Visual Science and Its Applications, vol. 1. 1996 OSA Technical Digest Series. Washington, DC: Optical Society of America, 1996: 194-7.
11. Dave T. Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system. Optometry Today 2003;4:52-7.
12. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976;53:740-5.
13. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:367-75.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1: 307-10.
15. Levene H. Robust tests for the equality of variance. In: Olkin I, ed. Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1960:278-92.