Interaction between Vitis vinifera and grape phylloxera: Changes in root tissue during nodosity formation

Annals of Botany

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 581-590

  Kellow, Alison V ^a,b,c   Sedgley, Margaret ^a   Van Heeswijck, Robyn ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b Adelaide Laboratory   (Australia)

^c MUSEUM OF NEW ZEALAND TE PAPA TONGAREWA   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Daktulosphaira vitifoliae; Gall formation; Grapevine; Nodosity; Phylloxera; Vitis vinifera

Indexed keywords

GALL; GENE EXPRESSION; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; ROOT;

DAKTULOSPHAIRA VITIFOLIAE; PHYLLOXERA; VITIS; VITIS SP.; VITIS VINIFERA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GRAPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HEMIPTERA; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; PARASITOLOGY; PLANT ROOT; PLANT TUMOR; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; HEMIPTERA; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT TUMORS; VITIS;

EID: 2542492081     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch082     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Atwell B, Bieleski R, Eamus D, Kriedmann P. 1999. Plants in action. Adaptation in nature, performance in cultivation. South Yarra, Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.
2. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, and Struhl K. 1999. Current protocols in molecular biology. New York: John Wiley & Co.
3. Boss PK, Davies C, Robinson S. 1996. Analysis of the expression of anthocyanin pathway genes in developing V. vinifera (L. cv Shiraz) grape berries and the implications for pathway regulation. Plant Physiology 111: 1059-1066.
4. Boubals D. 1966. Étude de la distribution et des causes de la resistance au phylloxera radicole chez les Vitacées. Annales d'Amelioration des Plantes 16: 145-184.
5. Bronner R. 1975. Simultaneous demonstration of lipids and starch in plant tissues. Stain Technology 50: 1-4.
6. Burton RA, Jenner H, Carrangis L, Fahy B, Fincher GB, Hylton C, Laurie DA, Parker M, Waite D, van Wegen S, Verhoeven T, Denyer K. 2002. Starch granule initiation and growth are altered in barley mutants that lack isoamylase activity. Plant Journal 31: 97-112.
7. Calderón AA, Zapata JM, Pedreño MA, Muñoz R, Barceló AR. 1992. Levels of 4-hydroxystilbene-oxidizing isoperoxidases related to constitutive disease resistance in in vitro-cultured grapevine. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 29: 63-70.
8. Corrie AM, Buchanan G, van Heeswijck R. 1997. DNA typing of populations of phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Fitch)) from Australian vineyards. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 3: 50-56.
9. Dai GH, Andary C, Mondolot-Cosson L, Boubals D. 1995. Histochemical studies on the interaction between three species of grapevine, Vitis vinifera, V. rupestris and V. rotundifolia and the downy mildew fungus Plasmopara viticola. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 46: 177-188.
10. Davies C, Robinson SP. 1996. Sugar accumulation in grape berries. Plant Physiology 111: 275-283.
11. Davies C, Wolf T, Robinson SP. 1999. Three putative sucrose transporters are differentially expressed in grapevine tissues. Plant Science 147: 93-100.
12. Davies C, Robinson SP. 2000. Differential screening indicates a dramatic change in mRNA profiles during grape berry ripening: Cloning and characterisation of cDNAs encoding putative cell wall and stress response proteins. Plant Physiology 122: 803-812.
13. Denisova TV. 1965. The phenolic complex of vine roots infested by phylloxera as a factor in resistance. Vestnik Selskokhoziaistvennoi Nauki 10: 114-118.
14. Dry I, Robinson, S. 1994. Molecular cloning and characterisation of grape berry polyphenol oxidase. Plant Molecular Biology 26: 495-502.
15. Farrar JF. 1991. Starch turnover: its role in source-sink relations and a comparison with the role of sucrose. In: Bonnemann JL, Delrot S, Lucas WJ, Dainty J, eds. Recent advances in phloem transport and assimilate compartmentation. Nantes, France: Ouest Editions, 213-223.
16. Forneck A, Kleinmann S, Blaich R, Anvari SF. 2002. Histochemistry and anatomy of phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) nodosities on young roots of grapevine (Vitis spp). Vitis 41: 93-97.
17. Granett J. 1990. Comparison of swellings caused by indoleacetic acid and tuberosities induced by grape phylloxera. Journal of Economic Entomology 83: 494-499.
18. Granett J, Walker MA, Kocsis L, Omer AD. 2001. Biology and management of grape phylloxera. Annual Review of Entomology 46: 387-412.
19. Granett J, Timper P, Lider LA. 1985. Grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) biotypes in California. Journal of Economic Entomology 78: 1463-1467.
20. Hofmann EL. 1957. Die histologie de nodositaten verschiedener rebensorten bie reblausbefall. Vitis 1: 125-141.
21. Hussey RS, Mims CW, Wescott SWI. 1992. Ultrastructure of root cortical cells parasitized by the ring nematode Criconomella xenoplax. Protoplasma 167: 55-65.
22. Jacobs AK, Dry IB, Robinson SP. 1999. Induction of different pathogenesis-related cDNAs in grapevine infected with powdery mildew and treated with ethephon. Plant Pathology 18: 325-336.
23. Jones MGK, Payne HL. 1977. The structure of syncytia induced by the phytoparasitic nematode Nacobbus aberrans in tomato roots, and the possible role of plasmodesmata in their nutrition. Journal of Cell Science 23: 299-313.
24. Kellow AV. 2000. A study of the interaction between susceptible and resistant grapevines and phylloxera. PhD Thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
25. Kellow AV, McDonald G, Corrie AM, van Heeswijck R. 2002. In vitro assessment of grapevine resistance to two populations of phylloxera from Australian vineyards. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 8: 109-116.
26. King PD, Rilling G. 1991. Further evidence of phylloxera biotypes: variations in the tolerance of mature grapevine roots related to the geographical origin of the insect. Vitis 30: 233-244.
27. Koch KE. 1996. Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 47: 509-540.
28. Koch KE, Nolte KD, Duke ER, McCarthy DR, Avigne WT. 1992. Sugar levels modulate differential expression of maize sucrose synthase genes. The Plant Cell 4: 59-69.
29. Langcake P. 1981. Disease resistance of Vitis spp. and the production of the stress metabolites resveratrol, ε-viniferin, α-viniferin and pterostilbene. Physiological Plant Pathology 18: 213-226.
30. Miles PW. 1990. Aphid salivary secretions and their involvement in plant toxicoses. In: Campbell RK, Eikenbary RD, eds. Aphid-plant genotype interactions. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 131-147.
31. Miles PW. 1999. Aphid saliva. Biological Review 74: 41-85.
32. Niklowitz W. 1954. Histologische studien an reblausgallen und reblausabwehrnekrosen. Phytopathology Z. 24: 299-340.
33. O'Brien TP, McCully ME. 1981. The study of plant structure. Principles and selected methods. Melbourne, Australia: Termacarphi Pty, Ltd.
34. Pate JS. 1975. Exchange of solutes between phloem and xylem and circulation in the whole plant. In: Zimmermann MH, Milburn JA, eds. Transport in plants. Phloem transport. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1.
35. Patrick JW. 1990. Sieve element unloading: cellular pathway, mechanism and control. Physiologia Plantarum 78: 298-308.
36. Peterson CA, Enstone DE. 1996. Functions of passage cells in the endodermis and exodermis of roots. Physiologia Plantarum 97: 592-598.
37. Pollard DG. 1973. Plant penetration by feeding aphids (Hemiptera, Aphidoidea): a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research 62: 631-714.
38. Ryan FJ, Omer AD, Aung LH, Granett J. 2000. Effects of infestation by grape phylloxera on sugars, free amino acids, and starch of grapevine roots. Vitis 39: 175-176.
39. Sijmons PC, Atkinson HJ, Wyss U. 1994. Parasitic strategies of root nematodes and associated host cell responses. Annual Review of Phytopathology 32: 235-259.
40. Sobetskiy LA, Derzhavina MA. 1973. A contribution to the study of the physiology of the feeding of the vine phylloxera, Viteus vitifolii Fitch (Homoptera, Phylloxeridae). Entomological Revue 52: 357-361.
41. Sparvoli F, Martin C, Scienza A, Gavazzi G, Tonelli C. 1994. Cloning and molecular analysis of structural genes involved in flavonoid and stilbene biosynthesis in grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Molecular Biology 24: 743-755.
42. Stines AP, Grubb J, Gockowiak H, Henschke PA, Høj PB, van Heeswijck R. 2000. Proline and arginine accumulation in developing berries of Vitis vinifera L. in Australian vineyards: influence of vine cultivar, berry maturity and tissue type. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 6: 150-158.
43. Sung S-JS, Xu D-P, Black CC. 1989. Identification of actively filling sucrose sinks. Plant Physiology 89: 1117-1121.
44. Tattersall DB, van Heeswijck R, Høj PB. 1997. Identification and characterization of a fruit-specific, thaumatin-like protein that accumulates at very high levels in conjunction with the onset of sugar accumulation and berry softening in grapes. Plant Physiology 114: 759-769.
45. Wang F, Sanz A, Brenner ML, Smith A. 1993. Sucrose synthase, starch accumulation, and tomato fruit sink strength. Plant Physiology 101: 321-327.
46. Warmbrodt RD. 1985. Studies on the root of Zea mays L. - structure of the adventitious roots with respect to phloem unloading. Botanical Gazette 146: 169-180.
47. Williamson VM, Hussey RS. 1996. Nematode pathogenesis and resistance in plants. The Plant Cell 8: 1735-1745.
48. Ziegler P. 1991. Starch metabolism in plants: an overview. In: Bonnemann JL, Delrot S, Lucas WJ, Dainty J, eds. Recent advances in phloem transport and assimilate compartmentation. Nantes, France: Ouest Editions, 197-203.
49. Zrenner R, Salanouba TM, Willmitzer L, Sonnewald U. 1995. Evidence of the crucial role of sucrose synthase for sink strength using transgenic potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.). The Plant Journal 7: 97-107.