Hybrid seismic protection of cable-stayed bridges

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 795-820

  Jung, H J ^a   Park, K S ^b   Spencer Jr , B F ^c   Lee, I W ^b  

^a Sejong University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Base isolation devices; Benchmark problem; Cable stayed bridge; Hybrid seismic protection; Semi active dampers

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAMPING; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS;

CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES; SEMI-ACTIVE DAMPERS;

SEISMOLOGY;

ALGORITHM; BRIDGE; CONTROL SYSTEM; DAMPING; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING;

EID: 2542445553     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.374     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abdel-Ghaffar AM, Ali HM. Toward seismic isolation of cable-stayed bridges. Proceedings of the Sixth U.S.-Japan Workshop on Bridge Engineering, 1990; pp. 515-529.
2. Takahashi M. Earthquake resistance design of the Meiko Nishi Bridge. Proceedings of the First U.S.-Japan Bridge Engineering Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan, 1984.
3. PWRI (Public Works Research Institute). Seismic design procedure of cable-stayed bridges: Part I, dynamic characteristics of cable-stayed bridges based on field vibration test results. Technical Report, Tsukuba, Japan (in Japanese), 1986.
4. Sakai T, Nishikawa K, Kawashima K. New design considerations for reducing seismic lateral force of highway bridges in Japan. Proceedings of the Eleventh IRF World Meeting, Seoul, Korea, 1989, pp. 1-4.
5. Kitazawa M, Noguchi J, Nishimori K, Izeki J. Earthquake resistant design of a long period structure and development of girder displacement stopper: Higashi Kobe Bridge. Proceedings of the Initial Symposium at Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan, 1991, pp. 123-141.
6. Ali HM, Abdel-Ghaffar AM. Seismic passive control of cable-stayed bridges. Shock and Vibration 1995; 2(4):259-272.
7. Iemura H, Adachi Y, Okashiro S, Mizutani T. Application of structural control technologies to seismic retrofit of a cable-stayed bridge. IABSE Conference. Seoul, Korea, 2001, Vol. 84, pp. 260-261.
8. Miyata T, Yamada H, Paulet-Grainiceanu F. Active structural control for cable bridges under earthquake loads. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, 1996, Vol. 2, pp. 53-58.
9. Paulet-Crainiceanu F. Seismic response control of cable-stayed bridges. Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Structural Control, 1998, Vol. 2, pp. 959-964.
10. Schemmann AG, Smith HA. Vibration control of cable-stayed bridges. Part 1: Modeling issues. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:811-824.
11. Schemmann AG, Smith HA. Vibration control of cable-stayed bridges. Part 2: Control analyses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:825-843.
12. Ni YQ, Spencer Jr BF, Ko JM. Feasibility of active control of cable-stayed bridge: an insight into Ting Kau Bridge. To appear in Liu SC (ed.), Stuart Structures and Materials 2001: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, Proceedings of SPIE 2001; 4330:387-398.
13. Jung H-J, Spencer Jr BF, Lee I-W. Benchmark control problem for seismically excited cable-stayed bridges using smart damping strategies. IABSE Conference. Seoul, Korea, 2001, Vol. 84, pp. 256-257.
14. Jung H-J, Spencer Jr BF, Lee I-W. Control of a seismically excited cable-stayed bridge employing MR fluid dampers. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129:873-883.
15. Moon SJ, Bergman LA, Voulgaris PG. Application of magnetorheological dampers to control of a cable-stayed bridge subjected to seismic excitation. Unpublished.
16. Koh HM, Park W, Park KS, Ok SY, Hahm D. Performance evaluation and cost effectiveness of semi-active vibration control system for cable-stayed bridges under earthquake excitation. IABSE Conference. Seoul, Korea, 2001, Vol. 84, pp. 258-259.
17. He WL, Agrawal AK, Mahmoud K. Control of seismically excited cable-stayed bridge using resetting semiactive stiffness dampers. Journal of Bridge Engineering (ASCE) 2001; 6:376-384.
18. Spencer Jr BF, Dyke SJ, Deoskar HS. Benchmark problem in structural control. Proceedings of the ASCE Structures Congress XV, Portland, Oregon, 1997, Vol. 2, pp. 1265-1269.
19. Spencer Jr BF, Dyke SJ, Deoskar HS. Benchmark problems in structural control: Part I-Active mass driver system. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:1127-1139.
20. Spencer Jr BF, Dyke SJ, Deoskar HS. Benchmark problems in structural control: Part II-Active tendon system. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:1141-1147.
21. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Session 7WB, structural control: a benchmark comparison. Proceedings of the ASCE Structures Congress XV, Portland, Oregon, 1997, Vol. 2, pp. 1265-1289.
22. Special Issue on Benchmark Problems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:1125-1397.
23. International Association on Structural Control (IASC). Session 10-Benchmark tests of buildings. Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan, 1998, Vol. 2, pp. 1349-1490.
24. Ohtori Y, Christenson RE, Spencer Jr BF, Dyke SJ. Benchmark control problems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings. http://www.nd.edu/quake/, 2000. To appear in Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004.
25. Dyke SJ, Turan G, Caicedo JM, Bergman LA, Hague S. Phase I benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129:857-872.
26. Yang JN, Wu JC, Samali B, Agrawal AK. A benchmark problem for response control of wind-excited tall buildings. http://www.eng.uci.edu/anil/benchmark.html.
27. Dyke SJ, Spencer Jr BF, Sain MK, Carlson JD. Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response. Smart Materials and Structures 1996; 5:565-575.
28. Dyke SJ, Spencer Jr BF. A comparison of semi-active control strategies for the MR damper. Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Intelligent Information Systems, The Bahamas, 1997.
29. Wilson JC, Gravelle W. Modelling of a cable-stayed bridge for dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1991; 20:707-721.
30. Robinson WH. Lead rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1982; 10:593-604.
31. Mayes RL, Jones LR, Kelly TE, Button MR. Base-isolation concepts for seismic bridge retrofit, in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering: Performance, Design and Construction. The Technical Council of Lifeline Earthquake Engineering of ASCE, San Francisco 1984: 67-81.
32. Dyke SJ, Spencer Jr BF, Sain MK, Carlson JD. An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection. Smart Materials and Structures 1998; 7(5):693-703.
33. Nishitani A, Inoue Y. Overview of the application of active/semiactive control to building structures in Japan. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:1565-1574.
34. Laub AJ, Health MT, Paige CC, Ward RC. Computation of system balancing transformations and other applications of simultaneous diagonalization algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1987; AC-32:17-32.
35. Spencer Jr BF, Suhardjo J, Sain MK. Frequency domain optimal control strategies for aseismic protection. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1994; 120:135-159.
36. Zhou K, Doyle JC, Glover K. Robust and Optimal Control. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 1996.
37. Park K-S, Jung H-J, Lee I-W. Hybrid control strategy for seismic protection of a benchmark cable-stayed bridge. Engineering Structures 2003; 25:405 417.
38. Turan G. Active control of a cable-stayed bridge against earthquake excitations. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001.
39. Soong TT, Spencer Jr BF. Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Engineering Structures 2002; 24:243-259.