Differentiating acute myocardial infarction from myocarditis: Diagnostic value of early- and delayed-perfusion cardiac MR imaging

Radiology

Volumn 237, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 75-82

  Laissy, Jean Pierre ^a   Hyafil, Fabien ^a   Feldman, Laurent J ^a   Juliard, Jean Michel ^a   Schouman Claeys, Elisabeth ^a   Steg, P Gabriel ^a   Faraggi, Marc ^a  

^a BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOCARDITIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDITIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE STANDARDS; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 25144501061     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2371041322     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Dec GW Jr, Waldman H, Southern J, Fallon J, Hutter AM Jr, Palacios I. Viral myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:85-89.
2. Hrobon P, Kuritz M, Hare JM. Should endomyocardial biopsy be performed for detection of myocarditis? a decision analytic approach. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998; 17:479-486.
3. Feldman AM, McNamara D. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1388-1398.
4. Angelini A, Calzolari V, Calabrese F, et al. Myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction: role of endomyocardial biopsy in the differential diagnosis. Heart 2000; 84:245-250.
5. Friedrich MG, Strohm O, Schulz-Menger J, Marciniak H, Luft FC, Dietz R. Contrast media-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging visualizes myocardial changes in the course of viral myocarditis. Circulation 1998;97:1802-1809.
6. Laissy JP, Messin B, Varenne O, et al. MR imaging of acute myocarditis: a comprehensive approach based on various imaging sequences. Chest 2002;122:1638-1648.
7. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al; and the American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for health care professionals from the cardiac imaging committee of the council on clinical cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-542.
8. Sandstede JJ, Lipke C, Beer M, et al. Analysis of first-pass and delayed contrast-enhancement patterns of dysfunctional myocardium on MR imaging: use in the prediction of myocardial viability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1737-1740.
9. Kim RJ, Hillenbrand HB, Judd RM. Evaluation of myocardial viability by MRI. Herz 2000;25:417-430.
10. Judd RM, Lugo-Olivieri CH, Masazumi A, et al. Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts. Circulation 1995;92:1902-1910.
11. Kim RJ, Che EL, Lima JA, Judd RM. Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. Circulation 1996;94:3318-3326.
12. Billingham ME, Tazelaar MD. The morphological progression of viral myocarditis. Postgrad Med J 1986;62:581-584.
13. Miller S, Helber U, Brechtel K, et al. MR imaging at rest early after myocardial infarction: detection of preserved function in regions with evidence for ischemic injury and nontransmural myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 2003;13:498-506.
14. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:765-772.
15. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445-1453.
16. Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1985-1991.
17. Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 2002;105:162-167.
18. Mahrholdt H, Goedecke C, Wagner A, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of human myocarditis: a comparison to histology and molecular pathology. Circulation 2004;109:1250-1258.