Refocusing the modelling of freight distribution: Development of an economic-based framework to ervaluate supply chain behaviour in response to congestion charging

Transportation

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 573-602

  Hensher, David A ^a   Puckett, Sean M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; HIGHWAY PLANNING; HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESEARCH;

FREIGHT DISTRIBUTION; SUPPLY CHAIN BEHAVIOUR; TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION;

CONGESTION; FREIGHT TRANSPORT; TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS;

EID: 25144492313     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-004-7615-6     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. W Abdelwahab 1998 Elasticities of mode choice probabilities and market elasticities of demand: Evidence from a simultaneous mode choice/ shipment-size freight transport model Transportation Research E 34 4 257-266
2. W Abdelwahab & M Sargious 1992 Modelling the demand for freight transport: A new approach Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 26 1 49-70
3. C Ambrosini & J-L Routhier 2004 Objectives, methods and results of surveys carried out in the field of urban freight transport: An international comparison Transport Reviews 24 1 57-77 10.1080/ 0144164032000122343
4. DP Bowyer 1991 Urban Freight Model Development Australian Road Research Board Melbourne
5. MS Bronzini 1980 Evolution of a multimodal freight transportation model Proceedings of the Transportation Research Forum 21 1 475-485
6. Bureau of Transport and Communications Economics (BTCE) 1996 Traffic Congestion and Road User Charges in Australian Capital Cities Australian Government Publishing Service Canberra Report 92.
7. Bureau of Transport Economics (BTE) (2000) Urban Congestion - Implications for Greenhouse Gas Emissions, BTE Information Sheet 16, Canberra.
8. M Chisholm & P O'Sullivan 1973 Freight Flows and Spatial Aspects of the British Economy Cambridge University Press Cambridge
9. S Chopra 2003 Designing the distribution network in a supply chain Transportation Research E 39 123-140
10. K Cullinane & N Toy 2000 Identifying influential attributes in freight route/mode choice decisions: A content analysis Transportation Research E 36 41-53
11. Danielis R & Rotaris L (2000) Analysing freight transport demand using stated preference data: A survey Trasporti Europei, 30-38.
12. G DeJong & W Walker 2004 National and international freight transport models: An overview and ideas for future development Transport Reviews 24 1 103-124
13. B Dellaert M Prodigalidad & J Louviere 1998 Family members' projections of each other's preference and influence: A two-stage conjoint approach Marketing Letters 9 2 135-145 10.1023/A:1007904931283
14. Department of Transport and Regional Services (DOTR) 2002 Freight Logistics in Australia: An Agenda for Action, Report prepared by the Industry Steering Committee of the Freight Transport Logistics Industry Action Agenda ACT Canberra
15. G D'Este 2000 Urban freight movement modelling. In: DA Hensher & KJ Button (eds) Transport Modelling Pergamon Press Oxford Vol. 1 of Handbooks in Transport, Chapter 34.
16. JE Fernandez & TL Friesz 1983 Equilibrium predictions in transportation markets: The state of the art Transportation Research B 17 2 155-172 10.1016/0191-2615(83)90043-7
17. Fisk CW & Boyce DE (1983) Optimal Transportation Systems Planning with Integrated Supply and Demand Models. Publication no. 16, Transportation Planning Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
18. TL Friesz J Gottfried RE Brooks AJ Zielen R Robin & SA Meleski 1981 The Northeast Regional Environmental Impact Study: Theory, Validation and Application of a Freight Network Equilibrium Model Argonne National Laboratory IL Report ANL/ES-120, Argonne.
19. TL Friesz & PT Harker 1985 Freight network equilibrium: A review of the state of the art. In: AF Daughety (ed) Analytical Studies in Transport Economics Cambridge University Press Cambridge pp. 161-206
20. TL Friesz PA Viton & PT Harker 1985 Economic and computation aspects of freight network equilibrium models: A synthesis Journal of Regional Science 25 1 29-49
21. RA Garrido & HS Mahmassani 2000 Forecasting freight transportation demand with the space-time multinomial probit model Transportation Research B 34 5 403-418 10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00032-6
22. SL Golicic JH Foggin & JT Mentzer 2003 Relationship magnitude and its role in interorganisational relationship structure. Journal of Business Logistics 24 1 57-75
23. E Gouvernal & M Guilbault 1990 Survey of shippers: Reconstitution of transport chains. In: E Ampt A Richardson & A Meyburg (eds) Selected Readings in Transport Survey Methodology Eucalyptus Press Melbourne pp. 237-248
24. PT Harker 1987 Predicting Intercity Freight Flows VNU Science Press Utrecht, The Netherlands
25. PT Harker & TL Friesz 1982 A simultaneous freight network equlibrium model Congressus Numerantium 36 365-402
26. PT Harker & TL Friesz 1985a Prediction of intercity freight flows, I: Theory Transportation Research B 20 2 139-153 10.1016/ 0191-2615(86)90004-4
27. PT Harker & TL Friesz 1985b Prediction of intercity freight flows, II: Mathematical formulations Transportation Research B 20 2 155-174 10.1016/0191-2615(86)90005-6
28. RI Harris & A Liu 1998 Input-output modelling of the urban and regional economy: The importance of external trade Regional Studies 32 9 851-862 10.1080/00343409850118004
29. Hautzinger H (1984) The Prediction of Interregional Goods Vehicle Flows: Some New Modeling Concepts, Ninth International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (pp. 375-396). VNU Science Press.
30. CA Hedges 1971 Demand Forecasting and Development of a Framework for Analysis of Urban Commodity Flow: Statement of the Problem Highway Research Board Washington, DC Special Report 120: Urban Commodity Flow.
31. Hensher DA (2003) Models of Organisational and Agency Choices for Passenger and Freight-Related Travel Choices: Notions of Inter-Activity and Influence, Resource Paper prepared for the 8th IATBR Conference workshop on Models of organisational choices (freight and passenger), August 2003 (pp. 10-15), Switzerland.
32. Hensher DA (2004) How do Respondents Handle Stated Choice Experiments? - Information Processing Strategies under Varying Information Load, DoD Paper #5, Institute of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney, March.
33. Hensher DA & Chow G (1999) In: Meersman H, Van de Voorde E & Winkelman W (eds) Interacting Agents and Discrete Choices in Logistics Outsourcing: A Conceptual Framework, World Transport Research, Vol 3: Transport Modelling/Assessment (pp. 365-376), Oxford: Pergamon Press.
34. Hensher DA and Puckett S (2004) Agent Interaction and Choice Revelation: The Establishment of Freight Distribution Contracts in Supply Chains (UGM Paper #4), Institute of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney.
35. Hensher DA, Puckett SM and Rose J (2004) Agency Decision Making in Freight Distribution Chains: Establishing a Parsimonious Empirical Strategy from Alternative Behavioural Structures (UGM#8), Institute of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney.
36. Hensher DA, Puckett SM and Rose J (in progress) Moving beyond the Limitations of Stated Preference Methods in the Analysis of Interactions: Stated Endogenous Attribute Level (SEAL) Analysis. Institute of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney.
37. Hensher DA, Rose J & Greene W (in press to appear in 2005) Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. DA Hensher PR Stopher & P Bullock 2003 Service quality - developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts Transportation Research A 37 499-517
39. J Holguín-Veras 2002 Revealed preference analysis of commercial vehicle choice process Journal of Transportation Engineering 128 4 336-346 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:4(336)
40. J Holguín-Veras & E Thorson 2003 Modelling commercial vehicle empty trips with a first order trip chain model Transportation Research B 37 2 129-148 10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00048-0
41. J Holmstrom K Framling J Tuomi M Karkkainen & T Ala-Risku 2003 Implementing collaboration process networks The International Journal of Logistics Management 13 2 39-50
42. F Jiang P Johnson & C Calzada 1999 Freight demand characteristics and mode choice: An analysis of the results of modeling with disaggregate revealed preference data Journal of Transportation and Statistics 2 2 149-158
43. K-H Lai EW Ngai & TC Cheng 2002 Measures for evaluating supply chain performance in transport logistics Transportation Research E 38 439-456
44. JJ Louviere DA Hensher & J Swait 2000 Stated Choice Methods Cambridge University Press Cambridge
45. McFadden D and Winston C (1981) Joint Estimation of Discrete and Continuous Choices in Freight Transportation 1981. Meeting of the Econometric Society.
46. D McFadden C Winston & A. Börsch-Supan 1985 Joint estimation of freight transportation decisions under nonrandom sampling. In: AF Daughety (ed) Analytical Studies in Transport Economics Cambridge University Press Cambridge pp. 137-157
47. HJ Noortman 1984 Goods Distribution in Urban Areas European Conference of Ministers of Transport Paris 5-64 Goods Distribution Systems in Urban Areas: Report of the 61st Round Table on Transport Economics.
48. Noortman HJ and van Es J (1978) Traffic Model, Manuscript for the Dutch Freight Transport Model.
49. KW Ogden 1977a Modelling urban freight generation Traffic Engineering and Control 18 3 106-109
50. KW Ogden 1977b Urban Goods Movement Monash University Melbourne
51. KW Ogden 1978 The distribution of truck trips and commodity flow in urban areas: A gravity model analysis Transportation Research 12 2 131-137 10.1016/0041-1647(78)90052-7
52. KW Ogden 1992 Urban Goods Movement: A Guide to Policy and Planning Ashgate Aldershot, UK
53. N Oppenheim 1993 A combined, equilibrium model of urban personal travel and goods movement Transportation Science 27 2 161-173
54. PM Panayides 2002 Economic organisation of intermodal transport Transport Reviews 22 4 401-414 10.1080/01441640210124523
55. Puckett SM & Hensher DA (2004a) Design and Development of the Interactive Stated Choice experiment in a Two-Agent Setting (UGM#3), Institute of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney.
56. Puckett SM and Hensher DA (2004b) Urban Goods Movement: A Literature Review (UGM#3), Institute of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney.
57. Puckett SM, Hensher DA and Battellino H (2004) In-depth Interviews with Freight Distribution Chain Stakeholders (UGM#5), Institute of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney.
58. AC Regan & R Garrido 2001 Freight demand and shipper behavior modeling: State of the art, directions for the future. In: DA Hensher & J King (eds) Travel Behavior Research: The Leading Edge Pergamon Press Oxford pp. 185-216
59. PO Roberts & BC Kullman 1979 Urban goods movement: Behavioural demand forecasting procedures. In: DA Hensher P & R Stopher (eds) Behavioural Travel Modelling Croom Helm London pp. 533-576
60. J Rose & DA Hensher 2004 Modelling agent interdependency in group decision making Transportation Research E 40 1 63-79
61. N Shinghal & T Fowkes 2002 Freight mode choice and adaptive stated preferences Transportation Research E 38 367-378
62. HL Slavin 1976 Demand for urban goods vehicle trips Transportation Research Record 591 32-37
63. Southworth F (1982) Logistic demand models for urban goods movement. In: Fisher GP and Meyburg AH (eds) Proceedings of the 4th Engineering Foundation Conference on Goods Transportation in Urban Areas (pp. 189-204), New York: Engineering Foundation.
64. E Taniguchi RG Thompson & T Yamada 2003 Predicting the effects of city logistics schemes Transport Reviews 23 4 489-515 10.1080/ 01441640210163999
65. HM Wagner 1975 Principles of Operations Research Prentice-Hall Englewood, Cliffs NJ
66. PL Watson 1975 Urban Goods Movement: A Disaggregate Approach Lexington Books Lexington MA, United States
67. CH Wen & FS Koppelman 2001 The generalized nested logit model Transportation Research B 35 7 627-641 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00045-X
68. CM Winston 1983 The demand for freight transportation: Models and applications Transportation Research A 17 6 419-427 10.1016/ 0191-2607(83)90162-0
69. DA Zavattero & SE Weseman 1981 Commercial vehicle trip generation in the Chicago region Transportation Research Record 834 12-15