A title I teacher’s beliefs, decision-making, and instruction at the third and seventh grade levels

Reading Research and Instruction

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 289-300

  Davis, Mimi Mitchell ^a   Wilson, Elizabeth K ^b  

^a Owensboro Kentucky   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25144459034     PISSN: 08860246     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19388079909558297     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allington, R. L. (1986). Policy constraints and effective compensatory instruction: A review. In J. Hoffman (Ed.), Effective teaching of reading: Research and practice (pp. 261-289). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
2. Brousseau, B. A., Book, C., & Byers, J. L. (1988). Teacher beliefs and the cultures of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 33-39.
3. Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17, 5-12.
4. Dillon, D. R., O’brien, D. G., Moje, E. B., & Stewart, R. A. (1994). Literacy learning in secondary school science classrooms: A cross-case analysis of three qualitative studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 345-362.
5. Elmore, R. F., Peterson, P., & McCarthey, S. J. (1996). Restructuring in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning, and School Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
6. Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 58(1), 47-65.
7. Fraatz, J. M. (1987). The politics of reading: Power, opportunity for prospects for change in America’s public schools. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
8. Goodman, K. S. (1985). Unity in reading. In H. Singer & R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp. 813-840). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
9. Gough, P. (1985). One second of reading. In H. Singer & R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp. 661-686). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
10. Harste, J., & Burke, C. (1977). A new hypothesis for reading teacher research: Both the teaching and learning of reading are theoretically based. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Reading: Theory and practice. Twenty-sixth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 32-40). Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference.
11. Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in the Classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
12. Kinzer, C. (1988). Instructional frameworks and instructional choices: Comparisons between preservice and inservice teachers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 20, 357-377.
13. Konopak, B., Readence, J., & Wilson, E. (1994). Comparing preservice and inservice secondary teachers’ beliefs and decisions about content area reading. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 220-227.
14. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education, a qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984, 1994). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Mitchell, M., Konopak, B., & Readence, J. (1991). The consistency between Chapter I teachers’ beliefs about reading and their instructional decision-making and interactions. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learner factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction. Fortieth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 377-384). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
17. Moje, E. B. (1994). Life’s experiences and teacher knowledge: How a content teacher decides to use literacy strategies. In C. K. Kinzer & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory, and practice. Forty-third yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 153-161). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
18. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317-328.
19. Newman, J. (1985). Insights from recent reading and writing research and their implications for developing whole language curriculum. In J. Newman (Ed.), Whole language: Theory in use.
20. Noll, E. (1998). Experiencing literacy in and out of schools: Case studies of two American Indian youths. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 205-232.
21. Ogle, D. (1986). KWL in action: Secondary teachers find applications that work. In E. K. Dishner, T. W. Bean, & J. E. Readence (Eds.), Content area reading: Improving classroom instruction (3rd ed., pp. 270-282). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
22. Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (pp. 609-640). New York: Longman.
23. Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Readence, J., Konopak, B., & Wilson, E. (1991, December). An examination content teachers’ beliefs and instructional choices and their actual planning and practices. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Palm Springs, CA.
25. Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading comprehension. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 558-586.
26. Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Toward an interactive model of reading. In H. Singer & R. Rud-dell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp. 722-750). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
27. Strickland, D. (1995). Whole language. In T. Harris & R. Hodges (Eds.), The literacy dictionary (pp. 279-281). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
28. Sturtevant, E. (1996). Lifetime influences on the literacy-related instructional beliefs of experienced high school history teachers: two comparative studies. Journal of Literacy Research. 28, 227-257.
29. Tancock, S. M. (1995). Classroom teachers and reading specialists examine their Chapter I reading programs. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 315-335.
30. Taylor, S. J., & Bogden, R. (1984). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
31. Wilson, E., Konopak, B., & Readence, J. (1992). Examining content area reading beliefs, decisions, and instruction: A case study of an English teacher. In C. K. Kinzer & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives. Forty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 475-482). Chicago: National Reading Conference.