Psychometric properties of the mini-mental state examination in patients with acquired brain injury in Turkey

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 306-311

  Elhan, Atilla H ^a   Kutlay, Sehim ^a   Küçükdeveci, Ayse A ^a,d   Çotuk, Çigdem ^a   Öztürk, Gülsah ^a   Tesio, Luigi ^b   Tennant, Alan ^c  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTITUTO AUXOLOGICO ITALIANO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cognition; Cross cultural; Differential item functioning; Mini Mental State Examination; Outcomes; Rasch analysis; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURY; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; ITALY; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; PSYCHOMETRY; RECALL; RELIABILITY; TIME PERCEPTION; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITION DISORDERS; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRANSLATIONS; TURKEY;

EID: 25144432877     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16501970510037573     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Zwecker M, Levenkrohn S, Fleising Y, Zeiling G, Ohry A, Adunsky A. Mini-Mental State Examination, cognitive FIM instrument, and the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment: relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 342-345.
2. Hajek VE, Gagnon S, Ruderman JE. Cognitive and functional assessments of stroke patients: an analysis of their relation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 1331-1337.
3. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-198.
4. Dick JPR, Guiloff RJ, Stewart A, Blackstock J, Bielawska C, Paul EA. Mini-Mental State Examination in neurological patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 496-499.
5. Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF. Population based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. JAMA 1993; 269: 2386-2391.
6. Hodges JR. Cognitive assessment for clinicians. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 1994.
7. Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorenson F, Grimby G, Marincek C, Philips S, et al. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 273-278.
8. Mungas D, Marshall SC, Weldon M, Haan M, Reed BR. Age and education correction of the Mini-Mental State Examination for the English and Spanish speaking elderly. Neurology 1996; 46: 700-706.
9. Ostrosky-Solis F, Lopez-Arango G, Ardilla A. Sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Mental State Examination in a Spanish speaking population. Appl Neuropsychol 2000; 7: 25-31.
10. Grigoletto F, Zappala G, Anderson DW, Lebowitz BD. Norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination in a healthy population. Neurology 1999; 2: 315-320.
11. Jorm AF, Scott R, Henderson AS, Kay DWK. Educational level differences on the Mini-Mental State: the role test bias. Psychol Med 1988; 18: 727-731.
12. Diamond PT, Felsenthal G, Macciocchi SN, Butlet DH, Lally-Cassady D. Effect of cognitive impairment on rehabilitation outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 75: 40-43.
13. Gungen C, Ertan T, Eker E, Yasar R, Engin F. Reliability and validity of the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination in the diagnosis of mild dementia in Turkish population. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2002; 13: 273-281.
14. Küçükdeveci AA, Kutlay S, Elhan AH, Tennant A. Preliminary study to evaluate the validity of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in a normal population in Turkey. Int J Rehabil Res 2005; 28: 77-79.
15. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1960 (reprinted 1980).
16. Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Grimby G, Ring H, Tesio L, Lawton G, Slade A, et al. Cross-cultural validity of FIM items in stroke in six European countries: a Rasch perspective. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 23-31.
17. Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L, Grimby G, Thonnard JL, Slade A, et al. Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model. The PRO-ESOR project. Med Care 2004: 42: I-37-I-48.
18. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297-334.
19. Fisher WP. Reliability statistics. Rasch Measure Trans 1992; 6: 238.
20. Nunally JC Jr. Psychometric theory (2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
21. Andrich D. Rasch Models for Measurement. London: SAGE Publications; 1988.
22. Prieto L, Alonso J, Lamarca R, Wright BD. Rasch measurement for reducing the Items of the Nottingham Health Profile. J Outcome Measure 1998; 2: 285-301.
23. Hagquist C, Andrich D. Is the Sense of Coherence-instrument applicable on adolescents? - a latent trait analysis using Rasch-modeling. Pers Indiv Differ 2004; 36: 955-968.
24. Küçükdeveci AA, Sahin H, Ataman S, Griffiths B, Tennant A. Issues in cross-cultural validity: example from the adaptation, reliability, and validity testing of a Turkish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 14-19.
25. Master GN. A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 1982; 47: 149-174.
26. Dorans NJ, Holland PW. DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardisation. In: Holland PW, Wainer H, eds. Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993, p. 36-66.
27. Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 311-319.
28. Kaziz L, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27: S178-S189.
29. Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measure Trans 1994; 7: 28.
30. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995; 310: 170.
31. Andrich D, Lyne A, Sheridon B, Luo G. RUMM 2010. Perth: RUMM Laboratory; 2000.
32. Feher EP, Mahurin RK, Doody RS, Cooke N, Sims J, Pirozzolo FJ. Establishing the limits of the Mini-Mental State. Examination of subtests. Arch Neurol 1992; 49: 87-92.
33. Alderson AL, Novack TA. Reliable serial measurement of cognitive processes in rehabilitation: the Cognitive Log. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 668-672.
34. Marshall SC, Mungas D, Weldon M, Reed B, Haan M. Differential item functioning in the mini-mental state examination in English- and Spanish-Speaking older adults. Psychol Aging 1997; 12: 718-725.