The reliability of hip scoring systems for total hip arthroplasty candidates: Assessment by physical therapists

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 659-661

  Kirmit, Linda ^a   Karatosun, Vasfi ^a,b   Unver, Bayram ^a   Bakirhan, Serkan ^a   Sen, Ayse ^a   Gocen, Zeliha ^a  

^a DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON HIP SCORE; ARTICLE; CHARNLEY HIP SCORE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; IOWA HIP SCORE; MALE; MERLE D AUBIGNE HIP SCORE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); PREOPERATIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 24944580943     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr869oa     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Lorna K. Case study: physical therapy management of hip osteoarthritis prior total hip arthroplasty (case study). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1997; 26: 35-38.
2. Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 8-24.
3. Harris WH, Sledge CB. Total hip and total knee replacement. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 801-807.
4. Bach CM, Feizelmeier H, Kaufmann G, Sununu T, Göbel G, Krismer M. Categorization diminishes the reliability of hip scores. Clin Orthop 2003; 411: 166-73.
5. Van Dillen LR, Roach KE. Reliability and validity of the acute care index of function for patients with neurological impairment. Phys Ther 1998; 68: 1098-01.
6. Söderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop 2001; 384: 189-197.
7. Murray D. The hip. In: Pynset P, Fairbank J, Carr A eds. Outcome measures in orthopaedics. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993: 199-215.
8. Goodwin RA. The Austin Moore prosthesis in fresh femoral neck fractures. (A review of 611 postoperative cases). Am J Orthop Surg 1968; 10: 40-43.
9. Hoving JL, Buchbinder R, Green S et al. How reliably do rheumatologists measure shoulder movement? Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 612-15.
10. Flynn JM, Donohoe M, Mackenzie WG. An independent assessment of two clubfoot-classification systems. J Pediatr Orthop 1998; 18: 323-27.
11. Springer BA, Arciero RA, Tenuta JJ, Taylor DC. A prospective study of modified Ottowa ankle rules in a military population. Interobserver agreement between physical therapists and orthopaedic surgeons. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28: 864-68.
12. Liow RYL, Walker K, Wajid MA, Bedi G, Lennox CME. Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: comparison of three scoring systems. Orthopedics 2003; 26: 143-47.
13. Bach CM, Nogler M, Steingruber IE et al. Scoring systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2002; 399: 184-96.
14. Garellick G, Malchau H, Herberts P. Specific or general health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip replacement: a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Notthingham Health Profile. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80B: 600-606.
15. Garellick G, Herberts P, Malchau H. The value of clinical data scoring systems: are traditional hip scoring systems adequate to use in evaluation after total hip surgery? J Arthroplasty 1999: 14: 1024-29.