Dynamic nonlinear cochlear model predictions of click-evoked otoacoustic emission suppression

Hearing Research

Volumn 207, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 99-109

  Harte, James M ^a   Elliott, Stephen J ^a   Kapadia, Sarosh ^a   Lutman, Mark E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Click response; Cochlear mechanical nonlinearities; Dynamic nonlinear model; Nonlinear interaction; Otoacoustic emissions; Suppression

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHLEA; HUMAN; MODEL; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; COCHLEA; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 24944569272     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. E. de Boer, and H.R. de Jongh On cochlear encoding: Potentialities and limitations of the reverse-correlation technique J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63 1978 115 135
2. P. van Dijk, H.P. Wit, and J.M. Segenhout Wiener kernel analysis of inner ear function in the American bullfrog J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95 1994 904 919
3. P. van Dijk, B. Maat, and H.P. Wit Wiener kernel analysis of a noise-evoked otoacoustic emission Br. J. Audiol. 31 1997 473 477
4. P. van Dijk, H.P. Wit, and J.M. Segenhout Dissecting the frog inner ear with Gaussian noise. I. Application of high-order Wiener-kernel analysis Hear. Res. 14 1997 229 242
5. Elliott, S.J., Harte, J.M., 2003. Models for compressive nonlinearities in the cochlea. University of Southampton, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research technical memorandum number 913, May 2003.
6. B.R. Glasberg, and B.C.J. Moore Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data Hear. Res. 47 1990 103 138
7. F. Grandori, and P. Ravazzani Nonlinearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the derived non-linear technique Brit. J. Audiol. 27 1993 97 102
8. Harte, J.M., 2004. Nonlinear identification for otoacoustic emissions, University of Southampton, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Ph.D. Thesis.
9. L.J. Kanis, and E. de Boer Self-suppression in a locally active nonlinear model of the cochlear: A quasilinear approach J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94 1993 3199 3206
10. S. Kapadia, and M.E. Lutman Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Assumed model and polarity-symmetry Hear. Res. 146 2000 89 100
11. S. Kapadia, and M.E. Lutman Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Experimental data Hear. Res. 146 2000 101 120
12. D.H. Keefe Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Measurement theory and nonlinear coherence J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103 1998 3489 3498
13. D.H. Keefe, and R. Ling Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Intermittent noise rejection, calibration and ear canal measurements J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103 1998 3499 3508
14. D.T. Kemp, and R.A. Chum Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions Hear. Res. 2 1980 213 232
15. Z. Kevanishvili, G. Tietze, and H. Gobsch Effects of the conditioning click on click-evoked otoacoustic emission Scand. Audiol. 25 1996 161 166
16. G. Lina-Granade, and L. Collet Effect of interstimulus-interval on evoked otoacoustic emissions Hear. Res. 87 1995 55 61
17. E.A. Lopez-Poveda, and R. Meddis A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110 2001 3107 3117
18. R.F. Lyon, and C. Mead An analogue electronic cochlea IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech Signal Process. 36 1988 1119 1133
19. Lyon, R.F., 1990. Automatic gain control in cochlear mechanics. In: Proceedings of the Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing Conference, Wisconsin, pp. 395-402.
20. D. McFadden, and M.F. Yama Upward shifts in the masking pattern with increasing masker intensity J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74 1983 1185 1189
21. R. Meddis, L.P. O'Mard, and E.A. Lopez-Poveda A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 2001 2852 2861
22. W.J. Murphy, A. Tubis, C.L. Talmadge, and G.R. Long Relaxation dynamics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions perturbed by external tones. I. Response to pulsed single-tone suppressors J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 1995 3702 3710
23. W.J. Murphy, A. Tubis, C.L. Talmadge, and G.R. Long Relaxation dynamics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions perturbed by external tones. II. Suppression of interacting emissions J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 1995 3711 3720
24. W.J. Murphy, A. Tubis, C.L. Talmadge, G.R. Long, and E.F. Krieg Relaxation dynamics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions perturbed by external tones. III. Response to a single tone at multiple suppression levels J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 1996 3979 3982
25. J.O. Pfeiffer A model for two-tone inhibition of single cochlear-nerve fibres J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 48 1970 1373 1378
26. W.S. Rhode, and A. Recio Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 2000 3317 3332
27. S. Rosen, R.J. Baker, and A. Darling Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listeners J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103 1998 2539 2550
28. G.A. Tavartkiladze, G.I. Frolenkov, A.V. Kruglov, and S.V. Artamasov Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions Brit. J. Audiol. 28 1994 193 204
29. J.P. Wilson Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine structure and tonal tinnitus Hear. Res. 2 1980 233 252
30. G.K. Yates Basilar membrane nonlinearity and its influence on auditory nerve rate-intensity functions Hear. Res. 50 1990 145 162
31. E. Zwicker A model describing nonlinearities in hearing by active processes with saturation at 40 dB Biol. Cybern. 35 1979 243 250
32. E. Zwicker A hardware cochlear nonlinear preprocessing model with active feedback J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80 1986 146 153
33. E. Zwicker "Otoacoustic" emissions in a nonlinear cochlear hardware model with feedback J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80 1986 154 162