A comparison of tissue reaction to MTA and an experimental root-end restorative material in rats

Australian Endodontic Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 69-72

  Modaresi, Jalil ^a   Yavari, S Amir Saeid ^a   Dianat, S Omid ^a   Shahrabi, Shokufeh ^a  

^a SHAHID SADOUGHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; INFLAMMATION; RANDOMIZATION; RAT; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; WISTAR FURTH RAT;

ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; FEMALE; INFLAMMATION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS; RATS, INBRED WF; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE;

EID: 24944547555     PISSN: 13291947     EISSN: 17474477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2005.tb00229.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Walton R, Torabmejad M. Principles and practice of endodontics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia; WB Saunders; 2002. p.426-33.
2. Ingle jl. Bakland LK. Endodontics. 5th ed. Hamilton, BC: Decker Inc.; 2002. p.705-06.
3. Torabinejad M, Hong C-U. Pitt Ford TR, Kariyawasam SR Tissue reaction to implanted super-EBA and mineral tnoxide aggregate in the mandible of guinea pigs: A preliminary report. JEndod 1995:21569-71.
4. Pitt Ford TR. Torabmejad M. McKendry DJ, Hong C-U. Kariyawasam SR Use of mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of furcal perforation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1995; 79:756-62.
5. Hargreaves KM. Goodis HW Seltzer and Bender's Dental Pulp. 3rd ed. Illinois. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.; 2002. p.329-33.
6. Modaresi J. Perforation repair comparing experimental new material "Cold Ceramic" and amalgam. Asian Dentist 2004; 11:6-7.
7. Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical application of mineral tnoxide aggregate. J Endod 1999; 25:197-205.
8. Kolokouris I. Economides N, Beltes R Vlemmas I. In vivo comparison of the biocompatibility of two root canal sealers implanted into the subcutaneous connective tissue of rats. JEndod 1998:24:82 5.
9. Wataha JC. Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners.J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86:203-09.
10. Torabinejad M. Higa RK, McKendry DJ, Pitt Ford TR. Dye leakage of four root-end filling materials: effects of blood contamination. J Endod 1994: 20:159-63.
11. Robbms SL, Kumar V Cotran RS. Robin's Basic Pathology. 7th ed. Pennsylvania: WB Saunders; 2002. p.61-78.
12. Holland R. Souza V Nery MJ, Filho JO, Bernabe FE, Dezan E. Reaction of rat connective tissue to implanted dentin tubes filled with mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium hydroxide. JEndod 1999;25:161-66.
13. Shabahang S, Torabinejad M. Boyne PR Abedi H, McMillan P A comparative study of root-end induction using osteogenic protein-1, calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate in dogs. JEndod 1999:25:1-5.
14. Holland R. Souza V Nery MJ, Filho JAO. Bernabe PFEB, Dezan E. Jr. Reaction of dogs' teeth to root canal filling with mineral tnoxide aggregate or a glass lonomer sealer. J Endod 1999: 25:728-30.
15. Olsson B, Sliwkowski A, Langeland K. Subcutaneous implantation for the biological evaluation of endodontic materials. J Endod 1981; 7:355-69.
16. Regan JD, Gutmann JL. Witherspoon DE. Comparison of Diaket and MTA when used as root-end filling materials to support regeneration of the penradicular tissues. Int Endod J 2002: 35:840 47.
17. Peterson L. Ellis E. Hupp J. Tucker M. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc.; 2002. p. 162.
18. Maher WR Johnson RL, Hess J. Steiman HR. Biocompatibility of retrograde filling materials in ferret canine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 73:738-45.
19. Torabinejad M. Pitt Ford TR, Anedi HR, Kariyawasam SR Tang H-M. Tissue reaction to implanted root-end filling materials in the tibia and mandible of guinea pigs. J Endod 1998; 24:468-71.
20. Kallus T Evaluation of the toxioty of denture base polymers after subcutaneous implantation in guinea pigs. J Prosthet Dent 1984:52:126 34. 72