Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 203-209

  Wataha, John C ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; REVIEW;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DENTAL MATERIALS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING;

EID: 0035430198     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.117056     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Wataha JC, Hanks CT. Biocompatibility testing - what can we anticipate? Trans Acad Dent Mater 1997:109-20.
2. Lemons JE. Dental implant biomaterials. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:716-9.
3. Albrektsson T. Direct bone anchorage of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:255-61
4. Black J, Sherk H, Bonini J, Rostoker WR, Schajowicz F, Galante JO. Metallosis associate with a stable titanium-alloy femoral component in total hip replacement. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:126-30.
5. Witt JD, Swann M. Metal wear and tissue response in failed titanium alloy total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:559-63.
6. Vamnes JS, Morken T, Helland S, Gjerdet NR. Dental gold alloys and contact hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 2000;42:128-33.
7. Hensten-Pettersen A. Casting alloys: side-effects. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:38-43.
8. Hensten-Pettersen A. Skin and mucosal reactions associated with dental materials. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:707-12.
9. Hildebrand HF, Veron C, Martin P. Nickel, chromium, cobalt dental alloys and allergic reactions: an overview. Biomaterials 1989;10:545-8.
10. Rustemeyer T, de Groot J, Von Blomberg BM, Frosch PJ, Scheper RJ. Cross-reactivity patterns of contact-sensitizing methacrylates. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1998;148:83-90.
11. McCann D. Future of latex debated in states. Am Dent Assoc News 1998;29:1, 10-11.
12. Shah M, Lewis FM, Gawkrodger DJ. Patch testing in children and adolescents: five years' experience and follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997;37:964-8.
13. Engle JH, Ferracane JL, Wichmann J, Okabe T. Quantitation of total mercury vapor released during dental procedures. Dent Mater 1992;8:176-80.
14. Örtengren U, Andreasson H, Karlsson S, Meding B, Barregard L. Prevalence of self-reported hand eczema and skin symptoms associated with dental materials among Swedish dentists. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:496-505.
15. Rustemeyer T, De Ligter S, Von Blomberg BM, Frosch PJ, Scheper RJ. Human T lymphocyte priming in vitro by haptenated autologous dendritic cells. Clin Exp Immunol 1999;117:209-16.
16. Jontell M, Hanks CT, Bratel J, Bergenholtz G. Effects of unpolymerized resin components on the function of accessory cells derived from the rat incisor pulp. J Dent Res 1995;74:1162-7.
17. Rakich DR, Wataha JC, Lefebvre CA, Weller RN. Effect of dentin bonding agents on the secretion of inflammatory mediators from macrophages. J Endod 1999;25:114-7.
18. BéruBé KA, Jones TP, Williamson BJ. Electron microscopy of urban airborne particulate matter. USA Microsc Analysis 1997;Sep:11-2.
19. Covington JS, McBride MA, Slagle WF, Disney AL. Quantization of nickel and beryllium leakage from base metal casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:127-36.
20. Goyer RA. Toxic effects of metals. In: Klaassen CD, Amdur MO, Doull J, editors. Casarett and Doull's toxicology. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Macmillan; 1986. p. 582-635.
21. Fan PL, Chang SB, Siew C. Environmental hazard evaluation of amalgam scrap. Dent Mater 1992;8:359-61.
22. Letzel H, deBoer FA, Van 't Hof MA. An estimation of the size distribution of amalgam particles in dental treatment waste. J Dent Res 1997;76:780-8.
23. Luz C. State societies can help with amalgam waste issues. Am Dent Assoc News 1999;22:6-9.
24. Hodgson E. Measurement of toxicity. In Hodgson E, Levi PE, editors. Modern toxicology. New York (NY): Elsevier; 1987. p. 233-85.
25. Hanks CT, Wataha JC, Sun Z. In vitro models of biocompatibility: a review. Dent Mater 1996;12:186-93.
26. Schuster GS, Lefebvre CA, Wataha JC, White SN. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials. J Calif Dent Assoc 1996;24:17-31.
27. Schweikl H, Schmalz G, Federlin M. Mutagenicity of the root canal sealer AHPlus in the Ames test. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2:125-9.
28. Stea S, Savarino L, Ciapetti G, Cenni E, Stea S, Trotta F, et al. Mutagenic potential of root canal sealers: evaluation through Ames testing. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:319-28.
29. Wennberg A, Mjör IA, Hensten-Pettersen A. Biological evaluation of dental restorative materials - a comparison of different test methods. J Biomed Mater Res 1983;17:23-36.
30. Mjör IA, Hensten-Pettersen A, Skogedal O. Biological evaluation of filling materials. A comparison of results using cell culture techniques, implantation tests and pulp studies. Int Dent J 1977;27:124-9.
31. Hensten-Pettersen A, Helgeland K. Evaluation of biological effects of dental materials using four different cell culture techniques. Scand J Dent Res 1977;85:291-6.
32. Hanks CT, Diehl ML, Craig RG, Makinen PK, Pashley DH. Characterization of the "in vitro pulp chamber" using the cytotoxicity of phenol. J Oral Pathol 1989;18:97-107.
33. Schmalz G. Modern concepts in biocompatibility testing of restorative materials. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1996;9:170-9.
34. Schmalz G. Concepts in biocompatibility testing of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1:154-62.
35. Improving patient care by reporting problems with medical devices. Definition of a medical device. Medwatch 1997;Sep:1-8.
36. International Standards Organization: biological evaluation of a medical devices. Part 1: guidance on selection of tests. 1st ed. ISO 10993-1. Geneva: ISO; 1992.
37. Alexander H. Substantially equivalent to what? J Appl Biomater 1994;5:375.