Conditions for the acceptance of deontic conditionals

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 96-105

  Over, D E ^a   Manktelow, K I ^b   Hadjichristidis, C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942662059     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0085800     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Almor, A., & Sloman, S. (1996). Is deontic reasoning special? Psychological Review, 103, 374-378.
2. Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bennett, J. (2003). A philosophical guide to conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391-416.
5. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187-276.
6. Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. H., & Over, D. E. (2003). Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 321-355.
7. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Hadjichristidis, C., Stevenson, R. J., Over, D. E., Sloman, S. A., Evans, J. St. B. T., & Feeney, A. (2001). On the evaluation of If p then q conditionals. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Edinburgh, Scotland.
9. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
10. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109, 646-678.
11. Manktelow, K. I. (1999). Reasoning and thinking. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
12. Manktelow, K. I., Fairley, N., Kilpatrick, S. G., & Over, D. E. (2000). Pragmatics and strategies for practical reasoning. In W. Schaeken, G. D'Ydewalle, G. De Vooght, & A. Vandierendonck (Eds.), Deductive reasoning and strategies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1990). Deontic thought and the selection task. In K. Gilhooly, M. Keane, R. Logie, & G. Erdos (Eds.), Lines of thought: Reflections on the psychology of thinking. London: Wiley.
14. Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1991). Social roles and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals. Cognition, 39, 85-105.
15. Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1992). Utility and deontic reasoning: Some comments on Johnson-Laird and Byrne. Cognition, 43, 193-188.
16. Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1995). Deontic reasoning. In S. E. Newstead & J. St. B. T. Evans (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking and reasoning: Essays in honour of Peter Wason. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Manktelow, K. I., Sutherland, E. J., & Over, D. E. (1995). Probabilistic factors in deontic reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 1, 201-220.
18. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608-631.
19. Oaksford, M., Chater, N., & Larkin, J. (2000). Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 883-889.
20. Oberauer, K., & Wilhelm, O. (2003). The meaning(s) of conditionals: Conditional probabilities, mental models and personal utilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 680-693.
21. Over, D. E., & Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). The probability of conditionals: The psychological evidence, Mind & Language, 18, 340-358.
22. Over D. E., & Manktelow, K. I. (1993). Rationality, utility and deontic reasoning. In K. I. Manktelow & D. E. Over (Eds.), Rationality: Psychological and philosophical perspectives. London: Routledge.
23. Stevenson, R. J., & Over, D. E. (1995). Deduction from uncertain premises. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 613-643.
24. Stevenson, R. J., & Over, D. E. (2001). Reasoning from uncertain premises: Effects of expertise and conversational context. Thinking and Reasoning, 7, 367-390.