Scenario-based performance engineering with UCMNAV

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2708, Issue , 2003, Pages 18-35

  Petriu, Dorin ^a   Amyot, Daniel ^b   Woodside, Murray ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTERS;

CAPACITY ESTIMATION; PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING; PERFORMANCE MODEL; SCENARIO SPECIFICATION; SCENARIO-BASED; USE CASE MAPS;

SPECIFICATIONS;

EID: 24944491879     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45075-0_2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. R. Pooley. Software Engineering and Performance: a Roadmap. The Future of Software Engineering, ICSE'2000, Limerick, Ireland, pp. 189-200, 2000
2. R.J.A. Buhr. Use Case Maps as Architectural Entities for Complex Systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. Vol. 24, No. 12, December 1998, 1131-1155, 1998
3. ITU-T, URN Focus Group. Draft Rec. Z.152 - UCM: Use Case Map Notation (UCM). Geneva, 2002
4. ITU-T. Recommendation Z.150 (02/03), User Requirements Notation (URN) - Language Requirements and Framework. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. (see also http://www.UseCaseMaps.org/urn/)
5. D. Amyot and E. Eberlein. An Evaluation of Scenario Notations and Construction Approaches for Telecommunication Systems Development. To appear in Telecommunication Systems Journal, 2003
6. A. Miga. Application of Use Case Maps to System Design with Tool Support. M.Eng. thesis, Dept. of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, 1998
7. D. Petriu and C.M. Woodside. Software Performance Models from System Scenarios in Use Case Maps. 12th Int. Conf. on Modelling Tools and Techniques for Computer and Communication System Performance Evaluation, London, U.K., April, 2002. (http://www.UseCaseMaps.org/pub/tools02.pdf)
8. D. Petriu and C.M. Woodside. Analysing Software Requirements Specifications for Performance. Third International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), Rome, Italy, 2002
9. W.C. Scratchley. Evaluation and Diagnosis of Concurrency Architectures. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, 2000
10. ITU-T. Recommendation Z.120 (11/99), Message Sequence Chart (MSC). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva
11. ITU-T. Recommendation Z.100 (08/02), Specification and Description Language (SDL). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva
12. W. Dulz, S. Gruhl, L. Lambert, and M. Sollner. Early performance prediction of SDL/MSC specified systems by automated synthetic code generation. SDL'99: Meeting UML, Proc. of the Ninth SDL Forum, Montréal, Canada, Elsevier, 1999
13. L. Kerber. Scenario-based Performance Evaluation of SDL/MSC-Specified Systems. Performance Engineering, LNCS 2047, Springer, pp. 185-201, 2001
14. Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language Specification, Version 1.5. March 2003. (http://www.omg.org)
15. P. Kähkipuro. UML-Based Performance Modeling Framework for Component-Based Distributed Systems. Performance Engineering, LNCS 2047, Springer, pp. 167-184, 2001
16. C.M. Woodside, C. Hrischuk, B. Selic, and S. Bayarov. Automated Performance Modeling of Software Generated by a Design Environment. Performance Evaluation, vol. 45, pp 107-124, July 2001
17. S. Balsamo and M. Simeoni. On transforming UML models into performance models. Workshop on Transformations in the Unified Modeling Language, Genova, Italy, April 2001
18. V. Cortellessa, A. Di Marco, and P. Inverardi. Comparing Performance Models from a Software Designer Perspective. TR SAH/042, Universita di L'Aquila, Italy, 2003. (http://sahara.di.univaq.it/tech.php?id_tech=42)
19. D. Amyot. Introduction to the User Requirements Notation: Learning by Example. Computer Networks, Vol.24/2, Elsevier, June 2003
20. Layered Queues for Software and Hardware Performance Modeling: Resource Page (http://www.layeredqueues.org/)
21. C.M. Woodside. Tutorial Introduction to Layered Performance Modeling of Software Performance. On-line, May 2002. (http://www.sce.carleton.ca/rads/lqn/lqn-documentation/tutorialf.pdf)
22. K. Siddiqui and C.M. Woodside. Performance-Aware Software Development (PASD) Using Resource Demand Budgets. Third International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), Rome, Italy, 2002
23. C.U. Smith and L.G. Williams. Performance Solutions. Addison-Wesley, 2001
24. Object Management Group. UML Profile for Scheduling, Performance and Time. Document ad/2001-06-14, http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/2001-06-14, June 2001