Software engineering and performance: A road-map

Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, ICSE 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 189-199

  Pooley, Rob ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Performance engineering; Software engineering

Indexed keywords

HARDWARE; LIFE CYCLE; PROGRAM DEBUGGING; QUEUEING THEORY; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

CAPACITY PLANNING; COMPONENT-BASED DEVELOPMENT; DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING; PERFORMANCE PREDICTION;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 38049164886     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/336512.336553     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Balbo, G. and Serazzi, G. Computer Performance Evaluation-Proceedings Modelling Techniques and Tools, (Tofino September 1992), Elsevier.
2. Bause F. and Buchholz, Protocol analysis using a timed version of SDL. in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Formal Description Techniques (FORTE '90)] (Madrid, 1991), Springer.
3. Beilner, H. and Stewing, F. Concepts and techniques of the performance modelling tool HIT. in Proceedings of the European Simulation Multiconference, (Vienna March 1987), SCS Europe, 84-89.
4. Ciardo, G., Muppala, J., and Trivedi, K. SPNP: Stochastic Petri net package. In Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop on Petri Nets and Performance (Kyoto, Japan, 1989), 142-151.
5. Davies, N. and Bradley, J. Eds. UKPEW '99, Proceedings of the" Fifteenth UK Performance Engineering Workshop (University of Bristol, July 1999). UKPEW.
6. Haring G. and Kotsis G. Computer Performance Evaluation-Modelling Techniques and Tools, 7th International Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation; Number 794 (Vienna, May 1994), LNCS 794, Springer-Verlag
7. Haring, G. and Wabnig, H. Eds Short Papers and Tool Descriptions, 7th International Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation (Vienna, May 1994), University of Vienna
8. Heck, E., Hogrefe, D., and Miiller-Clostermann, B. Hierarchical performance evaluation based on formally communication protocols. IEEE Trans. Comp 40,4 (1991), 500-513.
9. Hillston, J. A tool to enhance model exploitation. In Pooley R. and King P. Eds 6th International Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation (Edinburgh 1993), 131-142.
10. Hillston, J. A Compositional Approach to Performance Modelling, (1996) Cambridge University Press.
11. Kahkipuro, P. UML based performance modeling framework for object-oriented distributed systems. In ((UML '99-The Unified Modeling Language: Beyond the Standard (October 1999), 356-371.
12. King, P. and Pooley, R. Using UML to derive stochastic Petri net models. In Davies N. and Bradley J. Eds. UKPEW '99, Proceedings of the Fifteenth UK Performance Engineering Workshop (Bristol, July 1999), 45-56, UKPEW.
13. Minkowitz C., Vefland V. and Hughes, P. A modular approach to system structure and Specification. In 7th International Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation-Tools upplement, (Vienna 1994), University of Vienna, 83-86.
14. OMG, Unified Modeling Language 1.3, 1999 at http://www.rational.com/uml/documentation.html
15. Pooley R.J. The Integrated Modelling Support Environment. In Balbo and Serazzi Eds., Computer Performance Evaluation-Proceedings Modelling Techniques and Tools, (Torino September 1992), 1-16, Elsevier
16. Pooley, R. and Hillston, J. Computer Performance Evaluation-Modelling Techniques and Tools, 6th International Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation, Number 10 in Edits (Edinburgh 1993), Edinburgh University Press.
17. Pooley, R. and Kabajunga, C. Simulation of UML sequence diagrams. In Pooley R. and Thomas N. Eds, UK PEW '98-Proceedings of l4th UK Performance Engineering Workshop (Edinburgh, July 1998), 198-207, U-KPEW.
18. Pooley, R. and King, P. The Unified Modeling Language and performance engineering, IEE Proceedings-Software, 146, 1 (February 1999), 2-10.
19. Pooley, R. and Stevens, P. Component Based Software Engineering with UML, (December 1998), Addison-Wesley.
20. Pooley, R. and Thomas, N. UKPEW '98-Proceedings of 14th UK Performance Engineering Workshop (July 1998), UKPEW
21. Rico, N. and Bochmann, G. Performance description and analysis for distributed systems using a variant of LOTOS. In 10th International IFIP Symposium on Protocol Specification, Testing and Validation, (July 1990).
22. Smith, C. U. Performance Engineering of Software Systems (1990), Addison-Wesley.
23. Smith, C., Clements, P., and Woodside, M. Eds. 1st International Workshop on Software and Performance (Santa Fe, October 1999), ACM.
24. Utton, P. and Martin, G. Further experiences with software performance modelling. In WOSP '98, First International Workshop on Software and Performance (Santa Fe, October 1998), 14-15.
25. Valderruten, A., Hjiej, O., Benzekri, A., and Gazal, D. Deriving queueing networks performance models from annotated LOTOS specifications. In 6th International Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation (Edinburgh 1993), 120-130, Edinburgh University Press
26. Woodside C. M., Neilson J. E. and Majumdar S., The Stochastic Rendezvous Network Model for Performance of Synchronous Client-Server-like Distributed Software. IEEE Trans. on Computers, 44, 1 (January 1995), 20-39