The effect of an intermediate layer of flowable composite resin on microleakage in packable composite restorations

International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 349-354

  Ziskind, D ^a   Adell, I ^a   Teperovich, E ^a   Peretz, B ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AELITEFLO; BARIUM DERIVATIVE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PYRAMID PACKABLE COMPOSITE; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; BARIUM COMPOUNDS; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SILICON DIOXIDE;

EID: 24944467720     PISSN: 09607439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00663.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bausch JR, De Lange C, Davidson CL, Peters A, De Gee AJ. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1982; 48: 59-62.
2. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence International 1986; 17: 777-784.
3. Swartz J, Anderson MH, Pelleu JRGB. Reducing microleakage with the glass-ionomer/resin sandwich technique. Operative Dentistry 1990; 15: 186-192.
4. Lutz F, Krejcei J, Barbakow F. Restoration quality to wedge-mediated light channeling. Quintessence International 1992; 23: 763-767.
5. George LA, Richards ND, Eichmiller FC. Reduction of marginal gaps in composite restorations by use of glass-ceramic inserts. Operative Dentistry 1995; 20: 151-154.
6. Davidson CL, Feilzer A, De Gee AJ. The competition between the composite dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. Journal of Dental Research 1984; 63: 1396-1399.
7. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. Journal of Dental Research 1987; 66: 1636-1639.
8. Tolidis K, Sectos JC. Initial degree of polymerization shrinkage exhibited by flowable composite resins. [Abstract.] Journal of Dental Research 1999; 78: 482, 3015.
9. Jain P, Belcher M. Microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations with flowable composite in the proximal box. American Journal of Dentistry 2000; 13: 235-238.
10. Attar N, Turgut MD, Gungor HC. The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites. Operative Dentistry 2004; 29: 162-167.
11. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dental Materials 1990; 6: 167-171.
12. Swift EJ, Triolo PT, Jr, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. American Journal of Dentistry 1996; 9: 100-104.
13. Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, Kunzelman KH. Polymerization contraction stress in light cured packable composite resins. Dental Materials 2001; 17: 253-259.
14. Benzos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Operative Dentistry 2001; 26: 60-69.
15. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations. Operative Dentistry 2004; 29: 301-308.