Accommodative vergence is driven by the phasic component of the accommodative controller

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 97-102

  Jiang, B C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Accommodative adaptation; Accommodative vergence; Dark focus; Oculomotor

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADAPTATION; ADULT; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; DARKNESS; HUMAN; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0029655765     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00051-Z     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ebenholtz, S. M. & Fisher, S. K. (1982). Distance adaptation depends upon plasticity in the oculomotor control system. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 551-560.
2. Hung, G. K. & Semmlow, J. L. (1980). Static behavior of accommodation and vergence: Computer simulation of an interactive dual-feedback system. IEEE Transaction of Biomedical Engineering, BME 27, 439-447.
3. Lakkis, G. & Bruce, A. S. (1989). The effect of vergence adaptation on convergent accommodation. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 9, 97-98.
4. Owens, D. A. & Leibowitz, H. W. (1980). Accommodation, convergence, and distance perception in low illumination. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 57, 540-550.
5. Rosenfield, M. & Gilmartin, B. (1988a). Accommodative adaptation induced by sustained disparity-vergence. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 65, 118-126.
6. Rosenfield, M. & Gilmartin, B. (1988b). The effect of vergence adaptation on convergent accommodation. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 8, 172-177.
7. Rosenfield, M. & Gilmartin, B. (1990). Effect of target proximity on the open-loop accommodative response. Optometry and Vision Science, 67, 74-79.
8. Schor, C. M. (1979). The influence of rapid prism adaptation upon fixation disparity. Vision Research, 19, 757-765.
9. Schor, C. M. (1992). A dynamic model of cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence: Simulations of step and frequency responses. Optometry and Vision Science, 69, 258-269.
10. Schor, C. M. & Kotulak, J. C. (1986). Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive. Vision Research, 26, 927-942.
11. Schor, C. M., Kotulak, J. C. & Tsuetaki, T. (1986). Adaptation of tonic accommodation reduces accommodative lag and its masked in darkness. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 27, 820-827.
12. Tyrrell, R. A. & Owens, D. A. (1988). A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena: the modified binary search (MOBS). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 20, 137-141.
13. Westheimer, G. (1963). Amphetamine, barbiturates and accommodation-convergence. Archives of Ophthalmology, 7, 830-836.
14. White, J. M., Jiang, B.C. & Harrington, S. (1995). The effect of adaptation on accommodative responses in late-onset myopes and emmetropes. In preparation.