Smart 3D-FISH: Automation of distance analysis in nuclei of interphase cells by image processing

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 18-26

  Gué, Michael ^b   Messaoudi, Cédric ^a   Sun, Jian Sheng ^b   Boudier, Thomas ^a  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Confocal microscopy; Fluorescence; Image processing; ImageJ; Segmentation; Three dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization

Indexed keywords

4',6 DIAMINO 2 PHENYLINDOLE; FLUORESCENT DYE; INDOLE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AF4 GENE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL STRUCTURE; CHROMATIN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENL GENE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE; GENE LOCATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERPHASE; LYMPHOBLAST; MEASUREMENT; MLL GENE; PARAMETER; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY;

ALGORITHMS; CELL LINE; CELL NUCLEUS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 24944438267     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20170     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Manuelidis L. Individual interphase chromosome domains revealed by in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 1985;71:288-293.
2. Zirbel RM, et al. Evidence for a nuclear compartment of transcription and splicing located at chromosome domain boundaries. Chromosome Res 1993;1:93-106.
3. Lichter P, et al. Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries. Hum Genet 1988;80:224-234.
4. Solovei I, et al. Spatial preservation of nuclear chromatin architecture during three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization (3D-FISH). Exp Cell Res 2002;276:10-23.
5. Manuelidis L. A view of interphase chromosomes. Science 1990;250: 1533-1540.
6. Zorn C, et al. Laser UV microirradiation of interphase nuclei and post-treatment with caffeine. A new approach to establish the arrangement of interphase chromosomes. Hum Genet 1976;35:83-89.
7. Gerlich D, et al. Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells. Cell 2003;112:751-764.
8. Tanabe H, et al. Non-random radial arrangements of interphase chromosome territories: evolutionary considerations and functional implications. Mutat Res 2002;504:37-45.
9. Tanabe H, et al. Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:4424-4429.
10. Sun HB, et al. Size-dependent positioning of human chromosomes in interphase nuclei. Biophys J 2000;79:184-190.
11. Cremer T, et al. Chromosome territories, interchromatin domain compartment, and nuclear matrix: an integrated view of the functional nuclear architecture. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Exp 2000;10:179-212.
12. Parada LA, et al. Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes. Genome Biol 2004;5:R44.
13. Amrichova J, et al. Nuclear and territorial topography of chromosome telomeres in human lymphocytes. Exp Cell Res 2003;289:11-26.
14. Lukasova E, et al. Localisation and distance between ABL and BCR genes in interphase nuclei of bone marrow cells of control donors and patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Hum Genet 1997;100: 525-535.
15. Kozubek S, et al. The topological organization of chromosomes 9 and 22 in cell nuclei has a determinative role in the induction of t(9,22) translocations and in the pathogenesis of t(9,22) leukemias. Chromosoma 1999;108:426-435.
16. Neves H, et al. The nuclear topography of ABL, BCR, PML, and RARalpha genes: evidence for gene proximity in specific phases of the cell cycle and stages of hematopoietic differentiation. Blood 1999;93:1197-1207.
17. Nikiforova MN, et al. Proximity of chromosomal loci that participate in radiation-induced rearrangements in human cells. Science 2000;290:138-141.
18. Roix JJ, et al. Spatial proximity of translocation-prone gene loci in human lymphomas. Nat Genet 2003;34:287-291.
19. Alcobia I, et al. The spatial organization of centromeric heterochromatin during normal human lymphopoiesis: evidence for ontogenically determined spatial patterns. Exp Cell Res 2003;290:358-369.
20. Kozubek S, et al. Influence of cell fixation on chromatin topography. Anal Biochem 2000;282:29-38.
21. Rasband W. National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. ImageJ, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij.
22. von Bergh A, et al. A DNA probe combination for improved detection of MLL/11q23 breakpoints by double-color interphase-FISH in acute leukemias. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000;28:14-22.
23. Russ J. The image processing handbook. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002.
24. Castleman K. Digital image processing. Saddle Brook, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1996.
25. Netten H, et al. FISH and chips: automation of fluorescence dot counting in interphase cell nuclei. Cytometry 1997;28:1-10.
26. Ridler T, Calvard S. Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. Syst Man Cybernetics 1978;630-632.
27. Shmidt M, Préteux F. Un nouvel algorithme en morphologie mathématique: les rh-maxima et rh-minima. 2D Image Symp 1986;2:469-475.
28. Croft JA, et al. Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol 1999;145:1119-1131.
29. Weiler KS, Wakimoto BT. Chromosome rearrangements induce both variegated and reduced, uniform expression of heterochromatic genes in a development-specific manner. Genetics 1998;149:1451-l464.
30. Vermaak D, Wolffe AP. Chromatin and chromosomal controls in development. Dev Genet 1998;22:1-6.