19-Electron intermediates and cage-effects in the photochemical disproportionation of [CpW(CO)3]2 with Lewis bases

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 127, Issue 36, 2005, Pages 12555-12565

  Cahoon, James F ^a   Kling, Matthias F ^a,c   Schmatz, Stefan ^b   Harris, Charles B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c FOM INSTITUTE AMOLF   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS; SOLVENTS;

CAGE-EFFECTS; CHARGE DISTRIBUTIONS; LEWIS BASE; VIBRATIONAL FREQUENCIES;

ELECTRONS;

DICHLOROMETHANE; LEWIS BASE; N TRIBUTYLPHOSPHINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND; PHOSPHINE DERIVATIVE; RADICAL; SOLVENT; TIMETHYL PHOSPHITE; TRIPHENYLPHOSPHINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ATOM; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; COMPLEX FORMATION; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ELECTRON; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; STEREOSPECIFICITY; THERMODYNAMICS; VIBRATION;

ELECTRONS; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANOPHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; TIME FACTORS; TUNGSTEN;

EID: 24744470709     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja052221g     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Baird, M. C. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 1217-1227.
2. Astruc, D. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 1189-1216;
3. Tyler, D. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 325-331.
4. Wilkinson, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 6148-6149;
5. Pfab, W.; Fischer, E. O. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1953, 274, 316-322.
6. Mao, F.; Philbin, C. E.; Weakley, T. J. R.; Tyler, D. R. Organometallics 1990, 9, 1510-1516.
7. Mao, F.; Sur, S. K.; Tyler, D. R. Organometallics 1991, 10, 419-423.
8. Meyer, R.; Schut, D. M.; Keana, K. J.; Tyler, D. R. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 240, 405-412.
9. Schut, D. M.; Keana, K. J.; Tyler, D. R.; Rieger, P. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995; 117, 8939-8946
10. Geiger, W. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 351-357.
11. Braden, D. A.; Tyler, D. R. Organometallics 1998, 17, 4060-4064.
12. Anderson, O. P.; Fieldhouse, S. A.; Forbes, C. E.; Symons, M. C. R. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1976, 1329-1336.
13. Lionel, T.; R., M. J.; Preston, K. F., Chem. Phys. Lett. 1981, 81, 17-20.
14. Philbin, C. E.; Granatir, C. A.; Tyler, D. R., Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 4806-4807.
15. Therien, M. J.; Trogler, W. C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5127-5133.
16. Zhang, Y.; Gosser, D. K.; Rieger, P. H.; Sweigart, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4062-4068.
17. Castellani, M. P.; Tyler, D. R. Organometallics 1989, 8, 2113-2120;
18. Dixon, A. J.; George, M. W.; Hughes, C.; Poliakoff, M.; Turner, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1719-1729.
19. Lin, Z.; Hall, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6574-6575.
20. Neto, C. C.; Kim, S.; Meng, Q.; Sweigart, D. A.; Chung, Y. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2077-2078.
21. Stiegman, A. E.; Goldman, A. S.; Philbin, C. E.; Tyler, D. R. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 2976-2979.
22. Scott, S. L.; Espenson, J. H.; Chen, W.-J. Organometallics 1993, 12, 4077-4084.
23. Stiegman, A. E.; Tyler, D. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2944-2945.
24. Stiegman, A. E.; Tyler, D. R. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1985, 63, 217-240.
25. Stiegman, A. E.; Stieglitz, M.; Tyler, D. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6032-6037.
26. Philbin, C. E.; Goldman, A. S.; Tyler, D. R. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 4434-4436.
27. Kling, M. F.; Gaboon, J. F.; Glascoe, E. A.; Shanoski, J. E.; Harris, C. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11414-11415.
28. Shanoski, J. E.; Payne, C. K.; Kling, M. F.; Glascoe, E. A.; Harris, C. B. Organometallics 2005, 24, 1852-1859.
29. -1 (R=Ph).
30. Niu, S.; Hall, M. B. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 353-405.
31. Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian03, Revision B.04; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2004.
32. Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, G. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623-11627.
33. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652.
34. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phvs. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785-789.
35. Hay, P. J.; Wadt, W. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 299-310.
36. Andrae, D.; Häussermann, U.; Dolg, M.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H. Theor. Chim. Acta 1990, 77, 123-141.
37. Cahoon, J. F.; Kling, M. F.; Harris, C. B.; Schmatz, S., manuscript in preparation.
38. Reed, E. A.; Curtiss, L. A.; Weinhold, F. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 899-926.
39. Virrels, I. G.; George, M. W.; Johnson, F. P. A.; Turner, J. J.; Westwell, J. R. Organometallics 1995, 14, 5203-5208.
40. Peters, J.; George, M. W.; Turner, J. J. Organometallics 1995, 14, 1503-1506.
41. Bitterwolf, T. E., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 211, 235-254.
42. Laine, R. M.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem. 1977, 16, 388-391.
43. Scott, S. L.; Espenson, J. H.; Zhu, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1789-1797.
44. Song, J.-S.; Bullock, R. M.; Creutz, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9862-9864.
45. Haines, R. J.; Nyholm, R. S.; Stiddard, M. H. B. J. Chem. Soc. A. 1968, 43-46.
46. Haines, R. J.; Nolte, C. R. J. Organometallic Chem. 1970, 24, 725-736.
47. Haines, R. J.; DuPreez, A. L.; Marais, I. L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1971, 28, 97-104.
48. Allen, D. M,; Cox, A.; Kemp, T. J.; Sultana, Q.; Pitts, R. B. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1976, 1189-1193.
49. Baker, M. L.; Bloyce, P. E.; Campen, A. K.; Rest, A. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1990, 2825-2832.
50. Errors correspond to 95% confidence intervals. Large errors result from spectral overlap with the 17e radical peak.
51. Since the disproportionation process consumes 19e species, the 19e dynamics in the first 150 ps might be expected to contain a component which directly corresponds to the disproportionation process. The 19e species, however, is also being formed from the 17e radical on this time scale and so no time component relating to disproportionation is necessarily expected. In addition, spectral overlap with the 17e radical peak prevents accurate analysis of the early time dynamics.
52. Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502-16513.
53. The spectral data between 100 and 800 ps was fit to multiple Gaussian functions and the area of peaks corresponding to the 19e intermediate at multiple time delays were fit to a monoexponential rise, yielding the time constants cited.
54. Barbara, P. F.; Meyer, T. J.; Ratner, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 13148-13168.
55. Yu, Y.-X.; Gao, G.-H. Fluid Phase Equil. 1999, 166, 111-124.
56. - is expected to absorb.
57. 3.
58. 3, but it is sufficiently low in amplitude to be masked by the larger decay resulting from 19e formation in these Lewis bases.
59. Changes in concentration alter diffusion coefficients for solutions, changing the rate of diffusion. For small concentration differences, changes in the diffusion coefficient should be negligible.
60. Lacoste, M.; Astruc, D. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987, 667-669.
61. Lacoste, M.; Rabaa, H.; Astruc, D.; LeBeuze, A.; Saillard, J.-Y.; Précigoux, G., Organometallics 1989, 8, 2233-2242.
62. To the best of our knowledge, these values have not been published. Initial attempts to determine the reduction potentials of the phosphines suggest that decomposition of the solvent may occur before reduction is achieved; however, more rigorous attempts are called for.
63. Fernandez, A. L.; Ying Lee, T.; Reyes, C.; Prock, A.; Giering, W. P., Organometallics 1998, 17, 3169-3175.
64. Tolman, C. A. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 313-348.
65. Tolman, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 2953-2956.
66. Srinivas, G. N.; Yu, L.; Schwartz, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 677, 96-100.
67. Braden, D. A.; Tyler, D. R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 942-947.
68. Neglected in Scheme 5 are reactions involving separation of the 17e radicals prior to 19e formation. This scenario likely occurs for cases II and III and to a lesser extent for I. For cases II and III, 17e radical separation prevents disproportionation in the same manner as separation of the 17e and 19e species.
69. Turaki, N. N.; Huggins, J. M. Organometallics 1986, 5, 1703-1706.
70. At extremely high concentrations (e.g., with the Lewis base as solvent) the formation of two 19e species within the same solvent cage may hinder disproportionation.