On efficiency of decentralized environmental regulation

Journal of Regulatory Economics

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 129-140

  Kunce, Mitch ^a   Shogren, Jason F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental Fedralism; Fiscal Federalism; Iinterjurisdictional competition

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644508894     PISSN: 0922680X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11149-005-3105-9     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Brueckner, J. 2004. "Fiscal Decentralization with Distortionary Taxation: Tiebout vs. Tax Competition." International Tax and Public Finance 11: 133-153.
2. Feehan, J. 1989. "Pareto-Efficiency with Three Varieties of Public Input." Public Finance 44: 237-248.
3. Henderson, J. V. 1974. "A Note on the Economics of Public Intermediate Inputs." Economics 41: 322-337.
4. Kunce, M. 2000 "A Nash Tax Game Extending the Generality of the Henry George Theorem." Economics Letters 66: 229-233.
5. Kunce, M., and J. Shogren. 2002. "On Environmental Federalism and Direct Emission Control" Journal of Urban Economics 51: 238-245.
6. Kunce, M., and J. Shogren. 2005. "On Interjurisdictional Competition and Environmental Federalism." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 50: 212-224.
7. Levinson, A. 1997. "A Note on Environmental Federalism: Interpreting Some Contradictory Results." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33: 359-366.
8. Levinson, A. 1999. "NIMBY Taxes Matter: The Case of State Hazardous Waste Disposal Taxes" Journal of Public Economics 74: 31-51.
9. List, J., and S. Gerking. 2000. "Regulatory Federalism and Environmental Protection in the United States." Journal of Regional Science 40: 453-471.
10. List, J., and D. Millimet. 2003. "A Natural Experiment on the 'Race to the Bottom' Hypothesis: Testing for Stochastic Dominance in Temporal Pollution Trends." Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65: 395-420.
11. Matsumoto, M. 1998. "A Note on Tax Competition and Public Input Provision." Regional Science & Urban Economics 28: 465-473.
12. McMillan, J. 1979. "A Note on the Economics of Public Intermediate Goods." Public Finance 34: 293-339.
13. Millimet, D. 2003. "Assessing the Empirical Impact of Environmental Federalism." Journal of Regional Science 43: 711-733.
14. Oates, W. 1999. "An Essay on Fiscal Federalism." Journal of Economic. Literature XXXVII: 1120-1149.
15. Oates, W. 2002. "A Reconsideration of Environmental Federalism." In Recent Advances in Environmental Economics, edited by J. A. List and A. de Zeeuw. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
16. Oates, W., and R. Schwab. 1988. "Economic Competition Among Jurisdictions: Efficiency Enhancing or Distortion Inducing." Journal of Public Economics 35: 333-354.
17. Parry, I. 2001. How Large are the Welfare Costs of Tax Competition? Paper 01-28. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future
18. Richter, W. 1994. "The Efficient Allocation of Local Public Factors in Tiebout's Tradition." Regional Science and Urban Economics 24: 323-340.
19. Richter, W., and D. Wellisch. 1996. "The Provision of Local Public Goods and Factors in the Presence of Firm and Household Mobility." Journal of Public. Economics 60: 73-93.
20. Wellisch, D. 1995. "Locational Choices of Firms and Decentralized Environmental Policy with Various Instruments." Journal of Urban Economics 37: 290-310.
21. Wellisch, D. 2000. Theory of Public Finance in a Federal State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Zodrow, G., and P. Mieszkowski. 1986. "Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods." Journal of Urban Economics 19: 356-370.