A note on environmental federalism: Interpreting some contradictory results

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 359-366

  Levinson, Arik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERALISM; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION; REGULATORY COMPETITION;

EID: 0031194155     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1997.0997     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Barnett A. H. The Pigouvian tax rule under monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70:1980;1037-1041.
2. Cumberland J. H. Efficiency and equity in interregional environmental management. Rev. Reg. Stud. 2:1981;1-9.
3. Markusen J., Morey E., Olewiler N. Environmental policy when market structure and plant locations are endogenous. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 24:1993;69-86.
4. Markusen J., Morey E., Olewiler N. Noncooperative equilibria in regional environmental policies when plant locations are endogenous. J. Public Econom. 56:1995;55-77.
5. Oates W. E. Fiscal Federalism. 1972;Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
6. Oates W. E., Schwab R. M. Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing? J. Public Econom. 35:1988;333-354.
7. Oates W. E., Schwab R. M. The theory of regulatory federalism: The case of environmental management. The Economics of Environmental Regulation. 1996;Edward Elgar, London.
8. Peltzman S., Tideman T. N. Local versus national pollution control: Note. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62:1972;959-963.
9. Stein J. L. The 1971 report of the president's council of economic advisers: Microeconomic aspects of public policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 61:1971;531-537.