MTF correction for optimizing softcopy display of digital mammograms: Use of a vision model for predicting observer performance

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5034, Issue , 2003, Pages 323-327

  Krupinski, Elizabeth A ^a   Roehrig, Hans ^a   Engstrom, Michael ^a   Johnson, Jeffrey ^b   Lubin, Jeffrey ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b SARNOFF CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

CRT monitor; MTF; Observer performance; Vision model

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; CATHODE RAY TUBES; CHARGE COUPLED DEVICES; ERROR CORRECTION; OPTICAL CORRELATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PATIENT MONITORING; VISION;

VISION MODELS;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0041357153     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.479980     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. E. Krupinski, H. Roehrig, T. Furukawa, "influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search," Acad Radiol, 6, pp. 411-418, 1999.
2. E.A. Krupinski, H. Roehrig, "The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search," Acad Radiol, 7, pp. 8-13, 2000.
3. E.A. Krupinski, H. Roehrig, "Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displays," Acad Radiol, 9, pp. 638-645, 2002.
4. G.G. Reiker, H. Blume, R.M. Slone, P.M. Woodward, et al., "Filmless digital chest radiography within the radiology department," Proc SPIE Med Imag, 3035, pp. 355-368, 1997.
5. J. Lubin, "A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation," In E. Peli (ed) Visual Models for Target Detection and Recognition. World Scientific Publishers, Singapore, 1995.
6. J. Lubin, "The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance," In A.B. Watson (ed) Digital Images and Human Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993, pp. 163-178.
7. W.B. Jackson, M.R. Said, D.A. Jared, J.O. Larimer, J.L. Gille, J. Lubin, "Evaluation of human vision models for predicting human observer performance," Proc. SPIE Med. Imag. 3036, pp. 64-73, 1997.
8. M. Heath, K.W. Bower, D. Kopans, et al., "Current status of the digital database for screening mammography," In N. Karssemeijer, M. Thijssen, J. Hendriks, L. Van Erning (eds) Digital Mammography. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1998, pp. 457-460.
9. E.A. Krupinski, J. Johnson, H. Roehrig, J. Lubin, "Optimizing softcopy mammography displays using a human visual system model: influence of display phosphor," Proc. SPIE Med. Imag. 4686, pp. 331-337, 2001.
10. D. D. Dorfman, K.S. Berbaum, C.E. Metz, "Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method," Invest Radiol 27, pp. 723-731, 1992.
11. H. Roehrig, J. Fan, E.A. Krupinski, K. Gandhi, T. Furukawa, M. Ohashi, "LCDs versus CRTs, a comparative performance evaluation," Radiology, 225(P), pp. 186, 2002.