Effect of display resolution on the detection of mammographie lesions

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 5749, Issue , 2005, Pages 243-250

  Saunders Jr , Robert S ^a,b   Samei, Ehsan ^a,b,c   Johnson, Jeffrey ^d   Baker, Jay ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c USA   (United States)

^d SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Image Quality; Mammography; Simulation; Task Based Assessment

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCERS; BREAST LESIONS; CLINICAL TASKS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAMS; DISPLAY RESOLUTIONS; FUTURE WORKS; HUMAN DETECTIONS; HUMAN OBSERVERS; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MODEL RESULTS; PROCESSED IMAGES; SIMULATION; SIMULATION TECHNIQUES; STANDARD IMAGES; TASK-BASED ASSESSMENT;

BIOMINERALIZATION; BONE; CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY); CATHODE RAY TUBES; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; FLUORESCENT SCREENS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 24644433366     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.595682     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. M. J. Flynn and E. Samei, "Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems," Med Phys 26, 1612-1623 (1999).
2. W. Zhao, I. Blevis, S. Germann, J. A. Rowlands, D. Waechter and Z. S. Huang, "Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: Construction and evaluation of a prototype real-time detector," Med Phys 24, 1834-1843 (1997).
3. E. Samei and M. J. Flynn, "An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems," Med Phys 29, 447-459 (2002).
4. E. Samei and M. J. Flynn, "An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems," Med Phys 30, 608-622 (2003).
5. S. Vedantham, A. Karellas, S. Suryanarayanan, I. Levis, M. Sayag, R. Kleehammer, R. Heidsieck and C. J. D'Orsi, "Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: Physical characteristics of a clinical system," Med Phys 27, 1832-1840 (2000).
6. O. Tousignant, Y. Demers, L. Laperriere, M. Nishiki, S. Nagai, T. Tomisaki, A. Takahashi and K. Aoki, "Clinical performance of a 14"" * 14""real-time amorphous selenium flat-panel detector," Proc. SPIE 5030, 71-6 (2003).
7. B. Lazzari, G. Belli, C. Gori and K. Nykanen, "Physical characteristics of a clinical prototype for full-field digital mammography with an a-Se flat panel detector," Proc. SPIE 5030, 656-66 (2003).
8. S. S. Kang, J. K. Park, D. G. Lee, C. W. Mun, J. H. Kim and S. H. Nam, "X-ray detection properties of polycrystalline Cd/sub 1-x/Zn/sub x/Te detectors for digital radiography," Proc. SPIE 5030, 853-60 (2003).
9. D. C. Hunt, O. Tousignant, Y. Demers, L. Laperriere and J. A. Rowlands, "Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium flat-panel detector for digital fluoroscopy," Proc. SPIE 5030, 226-34 (2003).
10. J. Fan, W. J. Dallas, H. Roehrig, E. A. Krupinski, K. Gandhi and M. K. Sundareshan, "Spatial noise of high-resolution liquid-crystal displays for medical imaging: quantitative analysis, estimation, and compensation," Proc. SPIE 5367, 433-443 (2004).
11. E.A. Krupinski, J. Johnson, H. Roehrig, J. Lubin. "Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of display phosphor", Acad Radiol 10, 161-166 (2003).
12. A. Badano, R. M. Gagne, R. J. Jennings, S. E. Drilling, B. R. Imhoff and E. Muka, "Noise in flat-panel displays with subpixel structure," Med Phys 31, 715-723 (2004).
13. H. Roehrig, J. Gaskill, J. Fan, A. Poolla and C. Martin, "In-field evaluation of the modulation transfer function of electronic display devices," Proc. SPIE 5367, 456-463 (2004).
14. A. R. Pineda and H. H. Barrett, "What does DQE say about lesion detectability in digital radiography?," Proc. SPIE 4320, 561-9 (2001).
15. H. H. Barrett, "Quality time with the fractious Fourier family [image quality]," Proc. SPIE 4392, 9-21 (2001).
16. H. H. Barrett, "Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability," J Opt Soc Am A 7, 1266-78 (1990).
17. J. Fan, W. J. Dallas, H. Roehrig and E. A. Krupinski, "Improving visualization of digital mammograms on the CRT display system," Proc. SPIE 5029, 746-753 (2003).
18. K. D. Compton, "Factors affecting CRT display performance: specifying what works," Proc. SPIE 3976, 412-23 (2000).
19. S. Vedantham, A. Karellas, S. Suryanarayanan, D. Albagli, S. Han, E. J. Tkaczyk, C. E. Landberg, B. Opsahl-Ong, P. R. Granfors, I. Levis, C. J. D'Orsi and R. E. Hendrick, "Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: Physical characteristics of a clinical prototype," Med Phys 27, 558-567 (2000).
20. S. Suryanarayanan, A. Karellas and S. Vedantham, "Physical characteristics of a full-field digital mammography system," Nucl Instrum Methods 533, 560-570 (2004).
21. R. S. Saunders and E. Samei, "Characterization of breast masses for simulation purposes," Proc. SPIE 5372, 242-250 (2004).
22. R. S. Saunders Jr., E. Samei and J. A. Baker, "Simulation of Breast Lesions," 7th International Workshop on Digital Mammography (2004).
23. M. Heath, K. Bowyer, D. Kopans, R. Moore and P. Kegelmeyer, "The Digital Database for Screening Mammography," in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, edited by (Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, 2000), Vol. pp
24. E. Samei, M. J. Flynn and W. R. Eyler, "Simulation of subtle lung nodules in projection chest radiography," Radiology 202, 117-24 (1997).
25. J. M. Boone, K. K. Lindfors, V. N. Cooper, 3rd and J. A. Seibert, "Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results," Med Phys 27, 2408-16 (2000).
26. M. Stahl, T. Aach and S. Dippel, "Digital radiography enhancement by nonlinear multiscale processing," Med Phys 27, 56-65 (2000).
27. E. Samei, "TG18: A new development in display quality and performance evaluation," Med Phys 29, 1314-1314 (2002).
28. E. Samei and M. J. Flynn, "A method for in-field evaluation of the modulation transfer function of electronic display devices," Proc. SPIE 4319, 599-607 (2001).
29. R. S. Saunders, A. Farshchi and E. Samei, "Resolution and Noise Measurements of Selected Commercial Medical Displays," Med Phys (In Review, January 2005)
30. R. S. Saunders and E. Samei, "A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images," Med Phys 30, 3006-3017 (2003).
31. W. B. Jackson, M. R. Said, D. A. Jared, J. O. Larimer, J. Gille and J. Lubin, "Evaluation of human vision models for predicting human observer performance," Proc. SPIE 3036, 64-73 (1997).
32. E.A. Krupinski, J. Johnson, H. Roehrig, M. Engstrom, J. Fan, J. Nafziger, J. Lubin, W.J. Dallas. "Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation", Acad Radiol 10, 1030-1035 (2003).
33. J. Lubin. "A Visual Discrimination Model for Imaging System Design and Evaluation." In Peli E (Ed.) Visual Models for Target Detection and Recognition. Singapore: World Scientific Publishers (1995).
34. E.A. Krupinski, J. Johnson, H. Roehrig, J. Nafziger, J. Fan, J. Lubin. "Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images." J. Digital Imaging 17, 258-263 (2004).