Short-term immobilization of mice by methohexitone

Laboratory Animals

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 35-40

  Dorr W ^a,b   Weber Frisch, M ^b  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chemical restraint; Immobilization; Methohexitone; Mouse; Pentobarbitone

Indexed keywords

METHOHEXITAL;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; DRUG SAFETY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMMOBILIZATION; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LETHALITY; MOUSE; RIGHTING REFLEX;

EID: 2442722156     PISSN: 00236772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/002367799780578543     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Breitner A (1989) Untersuchungen zur Kinetik der Erholung vom subletalen Strahlenschaden des Zungenepithels der Maus (Diss. med. vet). München: LMU
2. Cruz JI, Loste JM, Burzaco OH (1998) Observations on the use of medetomidine/ketamine and its reversal with atipamezole for chemical restraint in the mouse. Laboratory Animals 32, 18-22
3. Dembo JB (1995) Methohexital versus propofol for outpatient anesthesia. Part II: Propofol is superior. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 53, 816-20
4. Doze VA, Westphal LM, White PF (1986) Comparison of propofol with methohexital for outpatient anaesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 65, 1189- 95
5. Dörr W (1994) Repopulation in mouse oral mucosa: treatment splits. Radiotherapy and Oncology 33, 139-47
6. Dörr W, Breitner A, Kummermehr J (1993) Capacity and kinetics of SLD repair in mouse tongue epithelium. Radiotherapy and Oncology 27, 36-45
7. Dörr W, Emmendörfer H, Haide E, et al. (1994) Proliferation equivalent of 'accelerated repopulation' in mouse oral mucosa. International Journal of Radiation Biology 66, 157-67
8. Dörr W. Kummermehr J (1990) Accelerated repopulation of mouse tongue epithelium during fractionated irradiations or following single doses. Radiotherapy and Oncology 17, 249-59
9. Dörr W, Kummermehr J (1991) Proliferation kinetics of mouse tongue epithelium under normal conditions and following single dose irradiation. Virchows Archiv B 60, 287-94
10. Dörr W, Weber-Frisch M (1995a) Effect of changing weekly dose on accelerated repopulation during fractionated irradiation of mouse tongue mucosa. International Journal of Radiation Biology 67, 577-85
11. Dörr W, Weber-Frisch M (1995b) Repopulation response of mouse oral mucosa during unconventional radiotherapy protocols. Radiotherapy and Oncology 37, 230-6
12. Ewen A, Archer DP, Samanani N, et al. (1995) Hyperalgesia during sedation: effects of barbiturates and propofol in the rat. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesiology 42, 532-40
13. Gentry WB, Krejcie TC, Henthorn TK, et al. (1996) Induction and maintenance of anesthesia in dogs by intravenous administration of methohexital. American Journal of Veterinary Research 57, 1044-9
14. Hunter PL (1989) The use of nalbuphine for analgesia in combination with methohexital sodium. Anesthesia in Progress 36, 150-68
15. Ilkiw JE (1992) Other potentially useful new injectable anesthetic agents. Veterinary Clinic of North America Small Animal Practice 22, 281-9
16. Klide AM (1992) Precautions when using alpha-2 agonists as anesthetics or anesthetic adjuvants. Veterinary Clinic of North America Small Animal Practice 22, 294-6
17. Lieblich SE (1995) Methohexital versus propofol for outpatient anesthesia. Part I: Methohexital is superior. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 53, 811-15
18. Logan MR, Duggan JE, Levack ID, et al. (1987) Single- shot i.v. anaesthesia for outpatient dental surgery. Comparison of 2,6 di-isopropyl phenol and methohexitone. British Journal of Anaesthesiology 59, 179-83
19. Lombard TP, Couper JL (1987) Propofol or methohexitone for induction anaesthesia for minor gynaecological procedures. South African Medical Journal 72, 843-5
20. Meyers CJ, Eisig SB, Kraut RA (1994) Comparison of propofol and methohexital for deep sedation. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 52, 449-52
21. Radu O (1994) Propofolnarkose bei Kleintieren - eine Alternative? Wissenschaftliche Tagung der Gesellschaft für Versuchstierkunde, München 1994. Book of abstracts p. 92
22. SAS Institute Inc. (1990) SAS/STAT Users Guide Version 6, 4th edn. Cary, USA, pp 892-906
23. Schoch H-P, Klein J, Ramboatiana R, et al. (1988) Propofol versus methohexital anesthesia in young patients. Agressologie 29, 29-31
24. Sellgren J, Biber B, Henriksson B-Ä, et al. (1992) The effects of propofol, methohexitone and isoflurane on the baroreceptor reflex in the cat. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 36, 784-90
25. Smith W (1993) Responses of laboratory animals to some injectable anaesthetics. Laboratory Animals 27, 30-9
26. Thompson N, Robertson GS (1996) Comparison of propofol and a propofol-methohexitone mixture for induction of day-case anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesiology 77, 213-16
27. Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ (1992) Advantages and guidelines for using alpha-2 agonists as anesthetic adjuvants. Veterinary Clinic of North America Small Animal Practice 22, 289-93
28. Wixson SK (1994) Rabbits and rodents: anesthesia and analgesia. In: Research Animal Anesthesia, Analgesy and Surgery (Smith AC, Swindle MM, eds). Greenbelt: The Scientists Center for Animal Welfare, pp 59-92