Comparison of propofol and a propofol-methohexitone mixture for induction of day-case anaesthesia

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 213-216

  Thompson, N ^a   Robertson, G S ^a  

^a ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia, day case; Anaesthetic techniques, induction; Anaesthetics i.v., methohexitone; Anaesthetics i.v., propofol

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT; ATROPINE; LIDOCAINE; METHOHEXITAL; PROPOFOL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; APNEA; ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COUGHING; DRUG MIXTURE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEART VENTRICLE EXTRASYSTOLE; HICCUP; HUMAN; INJECTION PAIN; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LARYNX SPASM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UROLOGIC SURGERY; VOMITING;

EID: 0030037893     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/77.2.213     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Sanderson JH, Blades JF. Multicentre study of propofol in day case surgery. Anaesthesia 1988; 43 (Suppl.): 70-73.
2. O'Toole DP, Milligan KR, Howe JP, McCollura JSC, Dundee JW. A comparison of propofol and methohexitone as induction agents for day case isoflurane anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 373-376.
3. Robertson GS, MacGregor DM, Jones CJ. Evaluation of doxapram for arousal from general anaesthesia in outpatients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1977; 49: 133-139.
4. Kenward MG, Lesaffre E, Molenberghs G. An application of maximum likelihood and generalised estimating equations to the analysis of ordinal data from a longitudinal study with cases missing at random. Biometrics 1994, 50: 945-953.
5. Mackenzie N, Grant IS. Comparison of the new emulsion formulation of propofol with methohexitone and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia in day cases. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1985; 57: 725-731.
6. Raeder JC, Misvaer G. Comparison of propofol induction with thiopentone or methohexitone in short outpatient general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1988; 32: 607-613.
7. McLeskey CH, Walawander CA, Nahrwold ML, Roizen MF. Adverse events in a multicentre phase IV study of propofol: evaluation by anesthesiologists and postanesthesia care unit nurses. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1993 ; 77 (4 Suppl.) : S3-9.
8. Taylor IN, Kenny GN, Glen JB. Pharmacodynamic stability of a mixture of propofol and alfentanil. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1992; 69: 168-171.
9. Heath PJ, Kennedy DJ, Ogg TW, Dunling C, Gilks WR. Which intravenous induction agent for day surgery? A comparison of propofol, thiopentone, methohexitone and etomidate. Anaesthesia 1988; 43: 365-368.
10. Wells JKG. Comparison of ICI 35868 etomidate and methohexitone for day-case anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1985; 57: 732-735.
11. Goroszeniuk T, Whitwam JG. Morgan M. Use of methohexitone, fentanyl and nitrous oxide for short surgical procedures. Anaesthesia 1977; 32: 209-211.
12. Helbo-Hansen S, Westergaard V, Krogh BL, Svendsen HP. The reduction of pain on injection of propofol: the effect of addition of lignocaine. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1988; 32: 502-504.
13. Simpson KH, Halsall PJ, Sides CA, Keeler JF. Pain on injection of methohexitone. The use of lignocaine to modify pain on injection of methohexitone during anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy. Anaesthesia 1989; 44: 688-689.