Shaping community problem solving around community knowledge

New York University Law Review

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 59-114

  López, Gerald P ^a,b  

^a Department of Clinical Law ^*

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442705110     PISSN: 00287881     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (140)

1. "JEHT" is an acronym for the foundation's core values: justice, equality, human dignity, and tolerance. See JEHT Foundation, at http://www.jehtfoundation.org/about.html.
2. For exemplary work central to the development of the economics of information, see JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, GLOBALIZATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS (2002) (describing information gaps between International Monetary Fund and World Bank officials and people affected by their policies); JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ & CARL E. WALSH, PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS (3rd ed. 2002) (adapting economics textbook to information economy); JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, WHITER SOCIALISM? (1994) (arguing that false assumptions about information led to socialism's failure and similarly plague market systems); George A. Akerlof, The Market for "Lemons": Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, 84 Q.J. ECON. 488 (1970) (presenting detailed econometric analysis of utility loss from asymmetric information); Michael Spence, Competitive and Optimal Responses to Signals: An Analysis of Efficiency and Distribution, 7 J. ECON. THEORY 296 (1974) (developing economic model of market signaling between buyers and sellers with unequal information).
3. For exemplary work central to the development of the economics of information, see JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, GLOBALIZATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS (2002) (describing information gaps between International Monetary Fund and World Bank officials and people affected by their policies); JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ & CARL E. WALSH, PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS (3rd ed. 2002) (adapting economics textbook to information economy); JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, WHITER SOCIALISM? (1994) (arguing that false assumptions about information led to socialism's failure and similarly plague market systems); George A. Akerlof, The Market for "Lemons": Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, 84 Q.J. ECON. 488 (1970) (presenting detailed econometric analysis of utility loss from asymmetric information); Michael Spence, Competitive and Optimal Responses to Signals: An Analysis of Efficiency and Distribution, 7 J. ECON. THEORY 296 (1974) (developing economic model of market signaling between buyers and sellers with unequal information).
4. For exemplary work central to the development of the economics of information, see JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, GLOBALIZATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS (2002) (describing information gaps between International Monetary Fund and World Bank officials and people affected by their policies); JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ & CARL E. WALSH, PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS (3rd ed. 2002) (adapting economics textbook to information economy); JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, WHITER SOCIALISM? (1994) (arguing that false assumptions about information led to socialism's failure and similarly plague market systems); George A. Akerlof, The Market for "Lemons": Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, 84 Q.J. ECON. 488 (1970) (presenting detailed econometric analysis of utility loss from asymmetric information); Michael Spence, Competitive and Optimal Responses to Signals: An Analysis of Efficiency and Distribution, 7 J. ECON. THEORY 296 (1974) (developing economic model of market signaling between buyers and sellers with unequal information).
5. For exemplary work central to the development of the economics of information, see JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, GLOBALIZATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS (2002) (describing information gaps between International Monetary Fund and World Bank officials and people affected by their policies); JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ & CARL E. WALSH, PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS (3rd ed. 2002) (adapting economics textbook to information economy); JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, WHITER SOCIALISM? (1994) (arguing that false assumptions about information led to socialism's failure and similarly plague market systems); George A. Akerlof, The Market for "Lemons": Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, 84 Q.J. ECON. 488 (1970) (presenting detailed econometric analysis of utility loss from asymmetric information); Michael Spence, Competitive and Optimal Responses to Signals: An Analysis of Efficiency and Distribution, 7 J. ECON. THEORY 296 (1974) (developing economic model of market signaling between buyers and sellers with unequal information).
6. For exemplary work central to the development of the economics of information, see JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, GLOBALIZATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS (2002) (describing information gaps between International Monetary Fund and World Bank officials and people affected by their policies); JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ & CARL E. WALSH, PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS (3rd ed. 2002) (adapting economics textbook to information economy); JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, WHITER SOCIALISM? (1994) (arguing that false assumptions about information led to socialism's failure and similarly plague market systems); George A. Akerlof, The Market for "Lemons": Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, 84 Q.J. ECON. 488 (1970) (presenting detailed econometric analysis of utility loss from asymmetric information); Michael Spence, Competitive and Optimal Responses to Signals: An Analysis of Efficiency and Distribution, 7 J. ECON. THEORY 296 (1974) (developing economic model of market signaling between buyers and sellers with unequal information).
7. For illustrations of how "knowledge is power" continues to be used today in discussions of consumer rights, see, e.g., William J. Kambas, A Safety Net in the E-Marketplace: The Safe Harbor Principles Offer Comprehensive Privacy Protection Without Stopping Data Flow, 9 ILSA J. INT'L & COMP. L. 149, 169 (2002) (arguing for strong enforcement of privacy rights regarding consumer data collection because "knowledge is power"); Thomas A. Fogarty, Know Which Way Wind is Blowing on Housing Prices, CHI. SUN-TIMES, Sept. 21, 2003, at S4 ("[I]n home buying, knowledge is power."). For illustrations of the adage's use in conversations about female power, see, e.g., Sharon S. Harzenski, Redefining Violence: Some Thoughts About Justice, Power, Peace, Respect, and the Fabric of Our Social Experience, 9 AM. U. J. GENDER SOC. POL'Y & L. 305, 341-42 (2001); Cassandra West, An Encouragement of Riches: Suze Orman Tells Women What It Takes to Build Their Own Fortunes, CHI. TRIB., Jan. 16, 2002, § 8, at 3 (discussing Orman's aim to share with women knowledge of financial portfolios). For illustrations of the saying's use in debates on education reform, see, e.g., Sheilah Vance, Should the Academic Support Professional Look to Counseling Theory and Practice to Help Students Achieve?, 69 UMKC L. REV. 499, 531 (2001) ("If 'knowledge is power,' an examination of counseling theory and practice can enhance the academic support professional as a powerful resource for optimum student academic achievement."); Linda Perlstein, Montgomery Officials Woo School Group for Charter, WASH. POST, Oct. 27, 2003, at B1 (describing growth of KIPP-Knowledge is Power Program-which runs 32 schools across country).
8. For illustrations of how "knowledge is power" continues to be used today in discussions of consumer rights, see, e.g., William J. Kambas, A Safety Net in the E-Marketplace: The Safe Harbor Principles Offer Comprehensive Privacy Protection Without Stopping Data Flow, 9 ILSA J. INT'L & COMP. L. 149, 169 (2002) (arguing for strong enforcement of privacy rights regarding consumer data collection because "knowledge is power"); Thomas A. Fogarty, Know Which Way Wind is Blowing on Housing Prices, CHI. SUN-TIMES, Sept. 21, 2003, at S4 ("[I]n home buying, knowledge is power."). For illustrations of the adage's use in conversations about female power, see, e.g., Sharon S. Harzenski, Redefining Violence: Some Thoughts About Justice, Power, Peace, Respect, and the Fabric of Our Social Experience, 9 AM. U. J. GENDER SOC. POL'Y & L. 305, 341-42 (2001); Cassandra West, An Encouragement of Riches: Suze Orman Tells Women What It Takes to Build Their Own Fortunes, CHI. TRIB., Jan. 16, 2002, § 8, at 3 (discussing Orman's aim to share with women knowledge of financial portfolios). For illustrations of the saying's use in debates on education reform, see, e.g., Sheilah Vance, Should the Academic Support Professional Look to Counseling Theory and Practice to Help Students Achieve?, 69 UMKC L. REV. 499, 531 (2001) ("If 'knowledge is power,' an examination of counseling theory and practice can enhance the academic support professional as a powerful resource for optimum student academic achievement."); Linda Perlstein, Montgomery Officials Woo School Group for Charter, WASH. POST, Oct. 27, 2003, at B1 (describing growth of KIPP-Knowledge is Power Program-which runs 32 schools across country).
9. For illustrations of how "knowledge is power" continues to be used today in discussions of consumer rights, see, e.g., William J. Kambas, A Safety Net in the E-Marketplace: The Safe Harbor Principles Offer Comprehensive Privacy Protection Without Stopping Data Flow, 9 ILSA J. INT'L & COMP. L. 149, 169 (2002) (arguing for strong enforcement of privacy rights regarding consumer data collection because "knowledge is power"); Thomas A. Fogarty, Know Which Way Wind is Blowing on Housing Prices, CHI. SUN-TIMES, Sept. 21, 2003, at S4 ("[I]n home buying, knowledge is power."). For illustrations of the adage's use in conversations about female power, see, e.g., Sharon S. Harzenski, Redefining Violence: Some Thoughts About Justice, Power, Peace, Respect, and the Fabric of Our Social Experience, 9 AM. U. J. GENDER SOC. POL'Y & L. 305, 341-42 (2001); Cassandra West, An Encouragement of Riches: Suze Orman Tells Women What It Takes to Build Their Own Fortunes, CHI. TRIB., Jan. 16, 2002, § 8, at 3 (discussing Orman's aim to share with women knowledge of financial portfolios). For illustrations of the saying's use in debates on education reform, see, e.g., Sheilah Vance, Should the Academic Support Professional Look to Counseling Theory and Practice to Help Students Achieve?, 69 UMKC L. REV. 499, 531 (2001) ("If 'knowledge is power,' an examination of counseling theory and practice can enhance the academic support professional as a powerful resource for optimum student academic achievement."); Linda Perlstein, Montgomery Officials Woo School Group for Charter, WASH. POST, Oct. 27, 2003, at B1 (describing growth of KIPP-Knowledge is Power Program-which runs 32 schools across country).
10. For illustrations of how "knowledge is power" continues to be used today in discussions of consumer rights, see, e.g., William J. Kambas, A Safety Net in the E-Marketplace: The Safe Harbor Principles Offer Comprehensive Privacy Protection Without Stopping Data Flow, 9 ILSA J. INT'L & COMP. L. 149, 169 (2002) (arguing for strong enforcement of privacy rights regarding consumer data collection because "knowledge is power"); Thomas A. Fogarty, Know Which Way Wind is Blowing on Housing Prices, CHI. SUN-TIMES, Sept. 21, 2003, at S4 ("[I]n home buying, knowledge is power."). For illustrations of the adage's use in conversations about female power, see, e.g., Sharon S. Harzenski, Redefining Violence: Some Thoughts About Justice, Power, Peace, Respect, and the Fabric of Our Social Experience, 9 AM. U. J. GENDER SOC. POL'Y & L. 305, 341-42 (2001); Cassandra West, An Encouragement of Riches: Suze Orman Tells Women What It Takes to Build Their Own Fortunes, CHI. TRIB., Jan. 16, 2002, § 8, at 3 (discussing Orman's aim to share with women knowledge of financial portfolios). For illustrations of the saying's use in debates on education reform, see, e.g., Sheilah Vance, Should the Academic Support Professional Look to Counseling Theory and Practice to Help Students Achieve?, 69 UMKC L. REV. 499, 531 (2001) ("If 'knowledge is power,' an examination of counseling theory and practice can enhance the academic support professional as a powerful resource for optimum student academic achievement."); Linda Perlstein, Montgomery Officials Woo School Group for Charter, WASH. POST, Oct. 27, 2003, at B1 (describing growth of KIPP-Knowledge is Power Program-which runs 32 schools across country).
11. For illustrations of how "knowledge is power" continues to be used today in discussions of consumer rights, see, e.g., William J. Kambas, A Safety Net in the E-Marketplace: The Safe Harbor Principles Offer Comprehensive Privacy Protection Without Stopping Data Flow, 9 ILSA J. INT'L & COMP. L. 149, 169 (2002) (arguing for strong enforcement of privacy rights regarding consumer data collection because "knowledge is power"); Thomas A. Fogarty, Know Which Way Wind is Blowing on Housing Prices, CHI. SUN-TIMES, Sept. 21, 2003, at S4 ("[I]n home buying, knowledge is power."). For illustrations of the adage's use in conversations about female power, see, e.g., Sharon S. Harzenski, Redefining Violence: Some Thoughts About Justice, Power, Peace, Respect, and the Fabric of Our Social Experience, 9 AM. U. J. GENDER SOC. POL'Y & L. 305, 341-42 (2001); Cassandra West, An Encouragement of Riches: Suze Orman Tells Women What It Takes to Build Their Own Fortunes, CHI. TRIB., Jan. 16, 2002, § 8, at 3 (discussing Orman's aim to share with women knowledge of financial portfolios). For illustrations of the saying's use in debates on education reform, see, e.g., Sheilah Vance, Should the Academic Support Professional Look to Counseling Theory and Practice to Help Students Achieve?, 69 UMKC L. REV. 499, 531 (2001) ("If 'knowledge is power,' an examination of counseling theory and practice can enhance the academic support professional as a powerful resource for optimum student academic achievement."); Linda Perlstein, Montgomery Officials Woo School Group for Charter, WASH. POST, Oct. 27, 2003, at B1 (describing growth of KIPP-Knowledge is Power Program-which runs 32 schools across country).
12. For illustrations of how "knowledge is power" continues to be used today in discussions of consumer rights, see, e.g., William J. Kambas, A Safety Net in the E-Marketplace: The Safe Harbor Principles Offer Comprehensive Privacy Protection Without Stopping Data Flow, 9 ILSA J. INT'L & COMP. L. 149, 169 (2002) (arguing for strong enforcement of privacy rights regarding consumer data collection because "knowledge is power"); Thomas A. Fogarty, Know Which Way Wind is Blowing on Housing Prices, CHI. SUN-TIMES, Sept. 21, 2003, at S4 ("[I]n home buying, knowledge is power."). For illustrations of the adage's use in conversations about female power, see, e.g., Sharon S. Harzenski, Redefining Violence: Some Thoughts About Justice, Power, Peace, Respect, and the Fabric of Our Social Experience, 9 AM. U. J. GENDER SOC. POL'Y & L. 305, 341-42 (2001); Cassandra West, An Encouragement of Riches: Suze Orman Tells Women What It Takes to Build Their Own Fortunes, CHI. TRIB., Jan. 16, 2002, § 8, at 3 (discussing Orman's aim to share with women knowledge of financial portfolios). For illustrations of the saying's use in debates on education reform, see, e.g., Sheilah Vance, Should the Academic Support Professional Look to Counseling Theory and Practice to Help Students Achieve?, 69 UMKC L. REV. 499, 531 (2001) ("If 'knowledge is power,' an examination of counseling theory and practice can enhance the academic support professional as a powerful resource for optimum student academic achievement."); Linda Perlstein, Montgomery Officials Woo School Group for Charter, WASH. POST, Oct. 27, 2003, at B1 (describing growth of KIPP-Knowledge is Power Program-which runs 32 schools across country).
13. See Shahid Yusuf & Joseph E. Stiglitz, Development Issues: Settled and Open, in FRONTIERS OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS: THE FUTURE IN PERSPECTIVE 227, 234 (Gerald M. Meier & Joseph E. Stiglitz eds., 2001) (applying "hard-won" understanding developed via "enlightened theorizing, painstaking analysis, an unsparing interrogation of practical experience, and the perspective of a half-century" to contemporary and future international economic development issues); Andrea Cornwall & John Gaventa, From Users and Choosers to Makers and Shapers: Repositioning Participation in Social Policy (Inst. of Dev. Studies, Working Paper No. 127, 2001) (discussing how citizen learning via participatory knowledge generation can help create new space for citizens to shape policy).
14. See Shahid Yusuf & Joseph E. Stiglitz, Development Issues: Settled and Open, in FRONTIERS OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS: THE FUTURE IN PERSPECTIVE 227, 234 (Gerald M. Meier & Joseph E. Stiglitz eds., 2001) (applying "hard-won" understanding developed via "enlightened theorizing, painstaking analysis, an unsparing interrogation of practical experience, and the perspective of a half-century" to contemporary and future international economic development issues); Andrea Cornwall & John Gaventa, From Users and Choosers to Makers and Shapers: Repositioning Participation in Social Policy (Inst. of Dev. Studies, Working Paper No. 127, 2001) (discussing how citizen learning via participatory knowledge generation can help create new space for citizens to shape policy).
15. For studies of Washington's civil indigent legal delivery system and proposed reforms, see LEGAL AID COMM., WASH. STATE BAR ASS'N, FINAL REPORT TO THE WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION BOARD OF GOVERNORS: CIVIL EQUAL JUSTICE FUNDING (1998), and LEGAL AID COMM., WASH. STATE BAR ASS'N, A REPORT ON THE NEED FOR CIVIL LEGAL SERVICES FOR POOR PERSONS IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON (1988).
16. For studies of Washington's civil indigent legal delivery system and proposed reforms, see LEGAL AID COMM., WASH. STATE BAR ASS'N, FINAL REPORT TO THE WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION BOARD OF GOVERNORS: CIVIL EQUAL JUSTICE FUNDING (1998), and LEGAL AID COMM., WASH. STATE BAR ASS'N, A REPORT ON THE NEED FOR CIVIL LEGAL SERVICES FOR POOR PERSONS IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON (1988).
17. For more of my elaborations on the contrast between the rebellious vision and dominant approach to problem solving, see GERALD P. LÓPEZ, REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO'S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW PRACTICE (1992). See also Gerald P. López, An Aversion to Clients: Loving Humanity and Hating Human Beings, 31 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 315 (1996); Gerald P. López, A Declaration of War by Other Means, 98 HARV. L. REV. 1667 (1985) ; Gerald P. López, Economic Development in the "Murder Capital of the Nation," 60 TENN. L. REV. 685 (1993); Gerald P. López, Foreword: Latinos and Latino Lawyers, 6 CHICANO L. REV. 1 (1983); Gerald P. López, The Idea of a Constitution in the Chicano Tradition, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 162 (1987); Gerald P. López, Lay Lawyering, 32 UCLA L. REV. 1 (1984); Gerald P. López, Reconceiving Civil Rights Practice: Seven Weeks in the Life of a Rebellious Collaboration, 77 GEO. L.J. 1603 (1989); Gerald P. López, Training Future Lawyers to Work with the Politically and Socially Subordinated: Anti-Generic Legal Education, 91 W. VA. L. REV. 305 (1989); Gerald P. López, The Work We Know So Little About, 42 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1989) [hereinafter López, The Work We Know So Little About].
18. For more of my elaborations on the contrast between the rebellious vision and dominant approach to problem solving, see GERALD P. LÓPEZ, REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO'S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW PRACTICE (1992). See also Gerald P. López, An Aversion to Clients: Loving Humanity and Hating Human Beings, 31 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 315 (1996); Gerald P. López, A Declaration of War by Other Means, 98 HARV. L. REV. 1667 (1985) ; Gerald P. López, Economic Development in the "Murder Capital of the Nation," 60 TENN. L. REV. 685 (1993); Gerald P. López, Foreword: Latinos and Latino Lawyers, 6 CHICANO L. REV. 1 (1983); Gerald P. López, The Idea of a Constitution in the Chicano Tradition, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 162 (1987); Gerald P. López, Lay Lawyering, 32 UCLA L. REV. 1 (1984); Gerald P. López, Reconceiving Civil Rights Practice: Seven Weeks in the Life of a Rebellious Collaboration, 77 GEO. L.J. 1603 (1989); Gerald P. López, Training Future Lawyers to Work with the Politically and Socially Subordinated: Anti-Generic Legal Education, 91 W. VA. L. REV. 305 (1989); Gerald P. López, The Work We Know So Little About, 42 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1989) [hereinafter López, The Work We Know So Little About].
19. For more of my elaborations on the contrast between the rebellious vision and dominant approach to problem solving, see GERALD P. LÓPEZ, REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO'S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW PRACTICE (1992). See also Gerald P. López, An Aversion to Clients: Loving Humanity and Hating Human Beings, 31 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 315 (1996); Gerald P. López, A Declaration of War by Other Means, 98 HARV. L. REV. 1667 (1985) ; Gerald P. López, Economic Development in the "Murder Capital of the Nation," 60 TENN. L. REV. 685 (1993); Gerald P. López, Foreword: Latinos and Latino Lawyers, 6 CHICANO L. REV. 1 (1983); Gerald P. López, The Idea of a Constitution in the Chicano Tradition, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 162 (1987); Gerald P. López, Lay Lawyering, 32 UCLA L. REV. 1 (1984); Gerald P. López, Reconceiving Civil Rights Practice: Seven Weeks in the Life of a Rebellious Collaboration, 77 GEO. L.J. 1603 (1989); Gerald P. López, Training Future Lawyers to Work with the Politically and Socially Subordinated: Anti-Generic Legal Education, 91 W. VA. L. REV. 305 (1989); Gerald P. López, The Work We Know So Little About, 42 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1989) [hereinafter López, The Work We Know So Little About].
20. For more of my elaborations on the contrast between the rebellious vision and dominant approach to problem solving, see GERALD P. LÓPEZ, REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO'S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW PRACTICE (1992). See also Gerald P. López, An Aversion to Clients: Loving Humanity and Hating Human Beings, 31 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 315 (1996); Gerald P. López, A Declaration of War by Other Means, 98 HARV. L. REV. 1667 (1985) ; Gerald P. López, Economic Development in the "Murder Capital of the Nation," 60 TENN. L. REV. 685 (1993); Gerald P. López, Foreword: Latinos and Latino Lawyers, 6 CHICANO L. REV. 1 (1983); Gerald P. López, The Idea of a Constitution in the Chicano Tradition, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 162 (1987); Gerald P. López, Lay Lawyering, 32 UCLA L. REV. 1 (1984); Gerald P. López, Reconceiving Civil Rights Practice: Seven Weeks in the Life of a Rebellious Collaboration, 77 GEO. L.J. 1603 (1989); Gerald P. López, Training Future Lawyers to Work with the Politically and Socially Subordinated: Anti-Generic Legal Education, 91 W. VA. L. REV. 305 (1989); Gerald P. López, The Work We Know So Little About, 42 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1989) [hereinafter López, The Work We Know So Little About].
21. For more of my elaborations on the contrast between the rebellious vision and dominant approach to problem solving, see GERALD P. LÓPEZ, REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO'S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW PRACTICE (1992). See also Gerald P. López, An Aversion to Clients: Loving Humanity and Hating Human Beings, 31 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 315 (1996); Gerald P. López, A Declaration of War by Other Means, 98 HARV. L. REV. 1667 (1985) ; Gerald P. López, Economic Development in the "Murder Capital of the Nation," 60 TENN. L. REV. 685 (1993); Gerald P. López, Foreword: Latinos and Latino Lawyers, 6 CHICANO L. REV. 1 (1983); Gerald P. López, The Idea of a Constitution in the Chicano Tradition, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 162 (1987); Gerald P. López, Lay Lawyering, 32 UCLA L. REV. 1 (1984); Gerald P. López, Reconceiving Civil Rights Practice: Seven Weeks in the Life of a Rebellious Collaboration, 77 GEO. L.J. 1603 (1989); Gerald P. López, Training Future Lawyers to Work with the Politically and Socially Subordinated: Anti-Generic Legal Education, 91 W. VA. L. REV. 305 (1989); Gerald P. López, The Work We Know So Little About, 42 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1989) [hereinafter López, The Work We Know So Little About].
22. For more of my elaborations on the contrast between the rebellious vision and dominant approach to problem solving, see GERALD P. LÓPEZ, REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO'S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW PRACTICE (1992). See also Gerald P. López, An Aversion to Clients: Loving Humanity and Hating Human Beings, 31 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 315 (1996); Gerald P. López, A Declaration of War by Other Means, 98 HARV. L. REV. 1667 (1985) ; Gerald P. López, Economic Development in the "Murder Capital of the Nation," 60 TENN. L. REV. 685 (1993); Gerald P. López, Foreword: Latinos and Latino Lawyers, 6 CHICANO L. REV. 1 (1983); Gerald P. López, The Idea of a Constitution in the Chicano Tradition, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 162 (1987); Gerald P. López, Lay Lawyering, 32 UCLA L. REV. 1 (1984); Gerald P. López, Reconceiving Civil Rights Practice: Seven Weeks in the Life of a Rebellious Collaboration, 77 GEO. L.J. 1603 (1989); Gerald P. López, Training Future Lawyers to Work with the Politically and Socially Subordinated: Anti-Generic Legal Education, 91 W. VA. L. REV. 305 (1989); Gerald P. López, The Work We Know So Little About, 42 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1989) [hereinafter López, The Work We Know So Little About].
23. For more of my elaborations on the contrast between the rebellious vision and dominant approach to problem solving, see GERALD P. LÓPEZ, REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO'S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW PRACTICE (1992). See also Gerald P. López, An Aversion to Clients: Loving Humanity and Hating Human Beings, 31 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 315 (1996); Gerald P. López, A Declaration of War by Other Means, 98 HARV. L. REV. 1667 (1985) ; Gerald P. López, Economic Development in the "Murder Capital of the Nation," 60 TENN. L. REV. 685 (1993); Gerald P. López, Foreword: Latinos and Latino Lawyers, 6 CHICANO L. REV. 1 (1983); Gerald P. López, The Idea of a Constitution in the Chicano Tradition, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 162 (1987); Gerald P. López, Lay Lawyering, 32 UCLA L. REV. 1 (1984); Gerald P. López, Reconceiving Civil Rights Practice: Seven Weeks in the Life of a Rebellious Collaboration, 77 GEO. L.J. 1603 (1989); Gerald P. López, Training Future Lawyers to Work with the Politically and Socially Subordinated: Anti-Generic Legal Education, 91 W. VA. L. REV. 305 (1989); Gerald P. López, The Work We Know So Little About, 42 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1989) [hereinafter López, The Work We Know So Little About].
24. For more of my elaborations on the contrast between the rebellious vision and dominant approach to problem solving, see GERALD P. LÓPEZ, REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO'S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW PRACTICE (1992). See also Gerald P. López, An Aversion to Clients: Loving Humanity and Hating Human Beings, 31 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 315 (1996); Gerald P. López, A Declaration of War by Other Means, 98 HARV. L. REV. 1667 (1985) ; Gerald P. López, Economic Development in the "Murder Capital of the Nation," 60 TENN. L. REV. 685 (1993); Gerald P. López, Foreword: Latinos and Latino Lawyers, 6 CHICANO L. REV. 1 (1983); Gerald P. López, The Idea of a Constitution in the Chicano Tradition, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 162 (1987); Gerald P. López, Lay Lawyering, 32 UCLA L. REV. 1 (1984); Gerald P. López, Reconceiving Civil Rights Practice: Seven Weeks in the Life of a Rebellious Collaboration, 77 GEO. L.J. 1603 (1989); Gerald P. López, Training Future Lawyers to Work with the Politically and Socially Subordinated: Anti-Generic Legal Education, 91 W. VA. L. REV. 305 (1989); Gerald P. López, The Work We Know So Little About, 42 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1989) [hereinafter López, The Work We Know So Little About].
25. For more of my elaborations on the contrast between the rebellious vision and dominant approach to problem solving, see GERALD P. LÓPEZ, REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO'S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW PRACTICE (1992). See also Gerald P. López, An Aversion to Clients: Loving Humanity and Hating Human Beings, 31 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 315 (1996); Gerald P. López, A Declaration of War by Other Means, 98 HARV. L. REV. 1667 (1985) ; Gerald P. López, Economic Development in the "Murder Capital of the Nation," 60 TENN. L. REV. 685 (1993); Gerald P. López, Foreword: Latinos and Latino Lawyers, 6 CHICANO L. REV. 1 (1983); Gerald P. López, The Idea of a Constitution in the Chicano Tradition, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 162 (1987); Gerald P. López, Lay Lawyering, 32 UCLA L. REV. 1 (1984); Gerald P. López, Reconceiving Civil Rights Practice: Seven Weeks in the Life of a Rebellious Collaboration, 77 GEO. L.J. 1603 (1989); Gerald P. López, Training Future Lawyers to Work with the Politically and Socially Subordinated: Anti-Generic Legal Education, 91 W. VA. L. REV. 305 (1989); Gerald P. López, The Work We Know So Little About, 42 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1989) [hereinafter López, The Work We Know So Little About].
26. For more of my elaborations on the contrast between the rebellious vision and dominant approach to problem solving, see GERALD P. LÓPEZ, REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO'S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW PRACTICE (1992). See also Gerald P. López, An Aversion to Clients: Loving Humanity and Hating Human Beings, 31 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 315 (1996); Gerald P. López, A Declaration of War by Other Means, 98 HARV. L. REV. 1667 (1985) ; Gerald P. López, Economic Development in the "Murder Capital of the Nation," 60 TENN. L. REV. 685 (1993); Gerald P. López, Foreword: Latinos and Latino Lawyers, 6 CHICANO L. REV. 1 (1983); Gerald P. López, The Idea of a Constitution in the Chicano Tradition, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 162 (1987); Gerald P. López, Lay Lawyering, 32 UCLA L. REV. 1 (1984); Gerald P. López, Reconceiving Civil Rights Practice: Seven Weeks in the Life of a Rebellious Collaboration, 77 GEO. L.J. 1603 (1989); Gerald P. López, Training Future Lawyers to Work with the Politically and Socially Subordinated: Anti-Generic Legal Education, 91 W. VA. L. REV. 305 (1989); Gerald P. López, The Work We Know So Little About, 42 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1989) [hereinafter López, The Work We Know So Little About].
27. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
28. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
29. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
30. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
31. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
32. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
33. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity,
34. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
35. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
36. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
37. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
38. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
39. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
40. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
41. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
42. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
43. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
44. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
45. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
46. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
47. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill
48. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
49. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
50. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
51. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
52. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
53. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
54. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
55. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
56. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
57. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
58. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
59. See supra note 6. For illustrations of exquisite work by Kim Taylor-Thompson on progressive law practice in the context of public defender work, see COMTY. JUSTICE INST., BRENNAN CTR. FOR JUSTICE, TAKING PUBLIC DEFENSE TO THE STREETS (Raising Voices Series, 2001), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/cji/cji.pdf; Kim Taylor-Thompson, Effective Assistance: Reconceiving the Role of the Chief Public Defender, 2 J. INST. STUD. LEG. ETHICS 199 (1999); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Empty Votes in Jury Deliberations, 113 HARV. L. REV. 1261 (2000); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Individual Actor v. Institutional Player: Alternating Visions of the Public Defender, 84 GEO L.J. 2419 (1996); Kim Taylor-Thompson, The Politics of Common Ground, 111 HARV. L. REV. 1306 (1998) (reviewing RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997)); Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 143 (2003); Kim Taylor-Thompson, Tuning Up Gideon's Trumpet, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1461 (2003). For equally exquisite work by Lucie E. White on progressive law practice in the context of social changes practice, see Lucie E. White, "Democracy" in Development Practice: Essays on a Fugitive Theme, 64 TENN. L. REV. 1073 (1997); Lucie E. White, Mobilization on the Margins of the Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak, 16 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 535 (1988); Lucie E. White, Paradox, Piece-Work, and Patience, 43 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1992); Lucie E. White, The Power Beyond Borders, 70 MISS. L.J. 865 (2001); Lucie E. White, Representing "The Real Deal," 45 U. MIAMI L. REV. 271 (1990-91); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990); Lucie E. White, To Learn and Teach: Lessons from Driefontein on Lawyering and Power, 1988 WIS. L. REV. 699 (1988). For an exploration of certain rebellious themes by the nation's best immigration scholar and lawyer, see BILL ONG HING, DEFINING AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY (2003); BILL ONG HING, MAKING AND REMAKING ASIAN AMERICA THROUGH IMMIGRATION POLICY, 1850-1990 (1993); THE STATE OF ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICA: REFRAMING THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE (Bill Ong Hing & Ronald Lee eds., 1996); BILL ONG HING, TO BE AN AMERICAN: CULTURAL PLURALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF ASSIMILATION (1997); Bill Ong Hing, Answering Challenges of the New Immigrant-Driven Diversity: Considering Integration Strategies, 40 BRANDEIS L.J. 861 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration-Driven Multiracial Society, 81 CAL. L. REV. 863 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, Border Patrol Abuse: Evaluating Complaint Procedures Available to Victims, 9 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 757 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, Don't Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Immigration Policies: Messages of Exclusion to African Americans, 37 How. L.J. 237 (1994); Bill Ong Hing, In the Interest of Racial Harmony: Revisiting the Lawyer's Duty to Work for the Common Good, 47 STAN. L. REV. 901 (1995); Bill Ong Hing, No Place for Angels: In Reaction to Kevin Johnson, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 559; Bill Ong Hing, Nonelectoral Activism in Asian Pacific American Communities and the Implications for Community Lawyering, 8 ASIAN PAC. AM. L.J. 246 (2002); Bill Ong Hing, Raising Personal Identification Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Physical Disability, and Age in Lawyering Courses, 45 STAN. L. REV. 1807 (1993); Bill Ong Hing, The Dark Side of Operation Gatekeeper, 7 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 121 (2001); Bill Ong Hing, The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community, 15 GEO. IMMIGR. L.J. 47 (2000); Bill Ong Hing, The Immigrant as Criminal: Punishing Dreamers, 9 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 79 (1998); Bill Ong Hing, Vigilante Racism: The De-Americanization of Immigrant America, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 441 (2002). For an example of wonderfully illuminating work by a new generation of legal scholars exploring central aspects of the rebellious vision, see Ascanio Piomelli, Appreciating Collaborative Lawyering, 6 CLINICAL L. REV. 427 (2000).
60. For a recent contribution on how cognitive notions shape law and law making, co-authored by Jerome Bruner, a founder of the "cognitive" field, and Anthony G. Amsterdam, a founder of the modern clinical legal education movement, see ANTHONY G. AMSTERDAM & JEROME BRUNER, MINDING THE LAW (2000). For a synthesis of the rigorous work Steven L. Winter has produced throughout his career on cognitive and social sciences, see STEVEN L. WINTER, A CLEARING IN THE FOREST: LAW, LIFE, AND MIND (2001).
61. For a recent contribution on how cognitive notions shape law and law making, co-authored by Jerome Bruner, a founder of the "cognitive" field, and Anthony G. Amsterdam, a founder of the modern clinical legal education movement, see ANTHONY G. AMSTERDAM & JEROME BRUNER, MINDING THE LAW (2000). For a synthesis of the rigorous work Steven L. Winter has produced throughout his career on cognitive and social sciences, see STEVEN L. WINTER, A CLEARING IN THE FOREST: LAW, LIFE, AND MIND (2001).
62. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
63. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman,
64. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
65. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
66. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
67. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
68. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
69. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
70. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
71. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
72. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
73. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
74. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
75. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
76. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
77. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
78. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
79. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
80. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
81. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic
82. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
83. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
84. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
85. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
86. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
87. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
88. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
89. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
90. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
91. For only a tiny sample of the remarkable interdisciplinary literature that, in the early period of my work on the rebellious vision, helped shape and deepen my theory, see generally GLORIA ANZALDÚA, BORDERLANDS/LA FRONTERA: THE NEW MESTIZA (1987); AUGUSTO BOAL, THEATER OF THE OPPRESSED (Charles A. McBride & Maria-Odilia Leal McBride trans., Theatre Communications Group ed. 1985) (1974); HAROLD CRUSE, THE CRISIS OF THE NEGRO INTELLECTUAL (1967); JOHN DEWEY, LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL ACTION (1935); JOHN DEWEY, THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY: A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION (1929); MICHEL FOUCAULT, MADNESS & CIVILIZATION: A HISTORY OF INSANITY IN THE AGE OF REASON (Richard Howard trans., Vintage Books ed. 1988) (1961); JOHN GAVENTA, POWER AND POWERLESSNESS: QUIESCENCE AND REBELLION IN AN APPALACHIAN VALLEY (1980); CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 216-17 (1983) ; THOMAS S. KUHN, THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1962); KURT LEWIN, A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zener trans., 1935); KARL N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION: DECIDING APPEALS (1960); FRIEDRICH W. NIETZSCHE, THE WILL TO POWER 296-97 (Walter Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale trans., Walter Kaufmann ed. 1967) (1901); RICHARD E. NISBETT & LEE ROSS, HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT (1980); RICHARD RORTY, Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism, in CONSEQUENCES OF PRAGMATISM (ESSAYS: 1972-1980) 160 (1982); RENATO ROSALDO, CULTURE AND TRUTH: THE REMAKING OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS (1989); ROGER C. SCHANK & ROBERT P. ABELSON, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS AND UNDERSTANDING (1977); THOMAS C. SCHELLING, THE STRATEGY OF CONFLICT 53-80 (1960); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER, FALSE NECESSITY: ANTI-NECESSITARIAN SOCIAL THEORY IN THE SERVICE OF RADICAL DEMOCRACY (1987); Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 217, 225-29 (1973); Gary Bellow, Turning Solutions into Problems: The Legal Aid Experience, 34 NLADA BRIEFCASE 106 (1977); William L.F. Felstiner et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . ., 15 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 631, 631-33 (1980-81); Kenneth L. Karst, Why Equality Matters, 17 GA. L. REV. 245 (1983); Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685 (1976); Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COMPUTER VISION 211 (Patrick Henry Winston ed., 1975), available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html; Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Idea of a Constitution, 37 J. LEGAL EDUC. 167 (1987); Bernice Johnson Reagon, Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, in HOME GIRLS: A BLACK FEMINIST ANTHOLOGY 343 (Barbara Smith ed., 1983); Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity, 84 PSYCHOL. REV. 327 (1977); Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, 5 COGNITIVE PSYCHOL. 207 (1973); Duncan Kennedy, Notes of an Oppositionist in Academic Politics (1982) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review); Dale Minami, Asian Law Caucus, Experiment in an Alternative (1980) (unpublished manuscript, on file with New York University Law Review).
92. Many seasoned community-based practices parallel in important respects my own view of the institutional and individual problem solving that operates across democracies, economics, and social life. See, e.g., Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California, at http://www.apalc.org (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (describing law firm that provides Asian and Pacific Islander and other communities with "multi-lingual, culturally sensitive services and legal education"); Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama, at http://www.eji.org (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (listing its projects as providing "legal representation to indigent defendants and prisoners, " working "with communities that have been marginalized by poverty and discouraged by unequal treatment," and producing materials for community advocates and policymakers involved in criminal justice reform); Immigrant Legal Resource Center, at http://www.ilrc.org/about.html (last visited Nov. 13, 2003) (describing work with immigrants and citizens "to make critical legal assistance and social services accessible to all, regardless of income, and to build a society that values diversity and respects the dignity and rights of all people"); Minami, Lew & Tamaki LLP, at http://www.mltsf.com (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (describing law firm that offers civil and criminal legal services and employs attorneys and staff who are bilingual in Japanese, Cantonese, Mandarin, Russian, and Spanish); New Visions for Public Schools, at http://www.newvisions.org/about (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (detailing New York City education reform organization's collaborations with parents, community leaders, school officials, and others in order to improve quality of public education).
93. Many seasoned community-based practices parallel in important respects my own view of the institutional and individual problem solving that operates across democracies, economics, and social life. See, e.g., Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California, at http://www.apalc.org (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (describing law firm that provides Asian and Pacific Islander and other communities with "multi-lingual, culturally sensitive services and legal education"); Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama, at http://www.eji.org (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (listing its projects as providing "legal representation to indigent defendants and prisoners, " working "with communities that have been marginalized by poverty and discouraged by unequal treatment," and producing materials for community advocates and policymakers involved in criminal justice reform); Immigrant Legal Resource Center, at http://www.ilrc.org/about.html (last visited Nov. 13, 2003) (describing work with immigrants and citizens "to make critical legal assistance and social services accessible to all, regardless of income, and to build a society that values diversity and respects the dignity and rights of all people"); Minami, Lew & Tamaki LLP, at http://www.mltsf.com (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (describing law firm that offers civil and criminal legal services and employs attorneys and staff who are bilingual in Japanese, Cantonese, Mandarin, Russian, and Spanish); New Visions for Public Schools, at http://www.newvisions.org/about (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (detailing New York City education reform organization's collaborations with parents, community leaders, school officials, and others in order to improve quality of public education).
94. Many seasoned community-based practices parallel in important respects my own view of the institutional and individual problem solving that operates across democracies, economics, and social life. See, e.g., Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California, at http://www.apalc.org (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (describing law firm that provides Asian and Pacific Islander and other communities with "multi-lingual, culturally sensitive services and legal education"); Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama, at http://www.eji.org (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (listing its projects as providing "legal representation to indigent defendants and prisoners, " working "with communities that have been marginalized by poverty and discouraged by unequal treatment," and producing materials for community advocates and policymakers involved in criminal justice reform); Immigrant Legal Resource Center, at http://www.ilrc.org/about.html (last visited Nov. 13, 2003) (describing work with immigrants and citizens "to make critical legal assistance and social services accessible to all, regardless of income, and to build a society that values diversity and respects the dignity and rights of all people"); Minami, Lew & Tamaki LLP, at http://www.mltsf.com (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (describing law firm that offers civil and criminal legal services and employs attorneys and staff who are bilingual in Japanese, Cantonese, Mandarin, Russian, and Spanish); New Visions for Public Schools, at http://www.newvisions.org/about (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (detailing New York City education reform organization's collaborations with parents, community leaders, school officials, and others in order to improve quality of public education).
95. Many seasoned community-based practices parallel in important respects my own view of the institutional and individual problem solving that operates across democracies, economics, and social life. See, e.g., Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California, at http://www.apalc.org (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (describing law firm that provides Asian and Pacific Islander and other communities with "multi-lingual, culturally sensitive services and legal education"); Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama, at http://www.eji.org (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (listing its projects as providing "legal representation to indigent defendants and prisoners, " working "with communities that have been marginalized by poverty and discouraged by unequal treatment," and producing materials for community advocates and policymakers involved in criminal justice reform); Immigrant Legal Resource Center, at http://www.ilrc.org/about.html (last visited Nov. 13, 2003) (describing work with immigrants and citizens "to make critical legal assistance and social services accessible to all, regardless of income, and to build a society that values diversity and respects the dignity and rights of all people"); Minami, Lew & Tamaki LLP, at http://www.mltsf.com (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (describing law firm that offers civil and criminal legal services and employs attorneys and staff who are bilingual in Japanese, Cantonese, Mandarin, Russian, and Spanish); New Visions for Public Schools, at http://www.newvisions.org/about (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (detailing New York City education reform organization's collaborations with parents, community leaders, school officials, and others in order to improve quality of public education).
96. Many seasoned community-based practices parallel in important respects my own view of the institutional and individual problem solving that operates across democracies, economics, and social life. See, e.g., Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California, at http://www.apalc.org (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (describing law firm that provides Asian and Pacific Islander and other communities with "multi-lingual, culturally sensitive services and legal education"); Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama, at http://www.eji.org (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (listing its projects as providing "legal representation to indigent defendants and prisoners, " working "with communities that have been marginalized by poverty and discouraged by unequal treatment," and producing materials for community advocates and policymakers involved in criminal justice reform); Immigrant Legal Resource Center, at http://www.ilrc.org/about.html (last visited Nov. 13, 2003) (describing work with immigrants and citizens "to make critical legal assistance and social services accessible to all, regardless of income, and to build a society that values diversity and respects the dignity and rights of all people"); Minami, Lew & Tamaki LLP, at http://www.mltsf.com (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (describing law firm that offers civil and criminal legal services and employs attorneys and staff who are bilingual in Japanese, Cantonese, Mandarin, Russian, and Spanish); New Visions for Public Schools, at http://www.newvisions.org/about (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (detailing New York City education reform organization's collaborations with parents, community leaders, school officials, and others in order to improve quality of public education).
97. For some examples of recent interdisciplinary scholarship studying these trends, see, for example, FRANK I. MICHELMAN, BRENNAN AND DEMOCRACY (1999) (describing Brennan's judicial activism as model for successful blending of participatory democracy and legal constitutionalism); STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN, DISSENT, INJUSTICE, AND THE MEANINGS OF AMERICA (1999) (contending that dissent, as essential tool for combating injustice and promoting progressive change, must be encouraged by our institutions rather than merely tolerated or even restricted); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER & CORNEL WEST, THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM: AN INITIATIVE FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC REFORM (1998) (advocating flexibility in institutional structure as prerequisite to reforms that seek to combat injustice); Susan Helper et al., Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism, 9 INDUS. & CORP. CHANGE 443 (2000) (claiming that collaborative learning explains existence of certain organizational forms that traditional theory of firms would not predict); Frank I. Michelman, Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World, in 28 NOMOS: JUSTIFICATION 71 (J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman eds., 1986) (arguing that moral legitimacy of autonomous legal institution is not incompatible with democratic system in which citizens cannot fully separate themselves from public corpus); Cornwall & Gaventa, supra note 4 (advocating greater citizen participation in social policy formation); Anne Marie Goetz & John Gaventa, Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery (Institute of Development Studies, Working Paper No. 138, 2001) (arguing that citizens must directly influence policy and spending decisions in order to intensify engagement with public service providers); Ricardo Hausmann & Dani Rodrik, Economic Development as Self-Discovery (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/selfdisc.pdf (emphasizing key role of self-learning about optimal production activities in development of growing economies); Dani Rodrik et al., Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/institutionsrule,%205.0.pdf (arguing that quality of institutions is more determinative of income levels than are other factors such as geography and trade).
98. For some examples of recent interdisciplinary scholarship studying these trends, see, for example, FRANK I. MICHELMAN, BRENNAN AND DEMOCRACY (1999) (describing Brennan's judicial activism as model for successful blending of participatory democracy and legal constitutionalism); STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN, DISSENT, INJUSTICE, AND THE MEANINGS OF AMERICA (1999) (contending that dissent, as essential tool for combating injustice and promoting progressive change, must be encouraged by our institutions rather than merely tolerated or even restricted); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER & CORNEL WEST, THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM: AN INITIATIVE FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC REFORM (1998) (advocating flexibility in institutional structure as prerequisite to reforms that seek to combat injustice); Susan Helper et al., Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism, 9 INDUS. & CORP. CHANGE 443 (2000) (claiming that collaborative learning explains existence of certain organizational forms that traditional theory of firms would not predict); Frank I. Michelman, Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World, in 28 NOMOS: JUSTIFICATION 71 (J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman eds., 1986) (arguing that moral legitimacy of autonomous legal institution is not incompatible with democratic system in which citizens cannot fully separate themselves from public corpus); Cornwall & Gaventa, supra note 4 (advocating greater citizen participation in social policy formation); Anne Marie Goetz & John Gaventa, Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery (Institute of Development Studies, Working Paper No. 138, 2001) (arguing that citizens must directly influence policy and spending decisions in order to intensify engagement with public service providers); Ricardo Hausmann & Dani Rodrik, Economic Development as Self-Discovery (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/selfdisc.pdf (emphasizing key role of self-learning about optimal production activities in development of growing economies); Dani Rodrik et al., Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/institutionsrule,%205.0.pdf (arguing that quality of institutions is more determinative of income levels than are other factors such as geography and trade).
99. For some examples of recent interdisciplinary scholarship studying these trends, see, for example, FRANK I. MICHELMAN, BRENNAN AND DEMOCRACY (1999) (describing Brennan's judicial activism as model for successful blending of participatory democracy and legal constitutionalism); STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN, DISSENT, INJUSTICE, AND THE MEANINGS OF AMERICA (1999) (contending that dissent, as essential tool for combating injustice and promoting progressive change, must be encouraged by our institutions rather than merely tolerated or even restricted); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER & CORNEL WEST, THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM: AN INITIATIVE FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC REFORM (1998) (advocating flexibility in institutional structure as prerequisite to reforms that seek to combat injustice); Susan Helper et al., Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism, 9 INDUS. & CORP. CHANGE 443 (2000) (claiming that collaborative learning explains existence of certain organizational forms that traditional theory of firms would not predict); Frank I. Michelman, Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World, in 28 NOMOS: JUSTIFICATION 71 (J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman eds., 1986) (arguing that moral legitimacy of autonomous legal institution is not incompatible with democratic system in which citizens cannot fully separate themselves from public corpus); Cornwall & Gaventa, supra note 4 (advocating greater citizen participation in social policy formation); Anne Marie Goetz & John Gaventa, Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery (Institute of Development Studies, Working Paper No. 138, 2001) (arguing that citizens must directly influence policy and spending decisions in order to intensify engagement with public service providers); Ricardo Hausmann & Dani Rodrik, Economic Development as Self-Discovery (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/selfdisc.pdf (emphasizing key role of self-learning about optimal production activities in development of growing economies); Dani Rodrik et al., Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/institutionsrule,%205.0.pdf (arguing that quality of institutions is more determinative of income levels than are other factors such as geography and trade).
100. For some examples of recent interdisciplinary scholarship studying these trends, see, for example, FRANK I. MICHELMAN, BRENNAN AND DEMOCRACY (1999) (describing Brennan's judicial activism as model for successful blending of participatory democracy and legal constitutionalism); STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN, DISSENT, INJUSTICE, AND THE MEANINGS OF AMERICA (1999) (contending that dissent, as essential tool for combating injustice and promoting progressive change, must be encouraged by our institutions rather than merely tolerated or even restricted); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER & CORNEL WEST, THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM: AN INITIATIVE FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC REFORM (1998) (advocating flexibility in institutional structure as prerequisite to reforms that seek to combat injustice); Susan Helper et al., Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism, 9 INDUS. & CORP. CHANGE 443 (2000) (claiming that collaborative learning explains existence of certain organizational forms that traditional theory of firms would not predict); Frank I. Michelman, Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World, in 28 NOMOS: JUSTIFICATION 71 (J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman eds., 1986) (arguing that moral legitimacy of autonomous legal institution is not incompatible with democratic system in which citizens cannot fully separate themselves from public corpus); Cornwall & Gaventa, supra note 4 (advocating greater citizen participation in social policy formation); Anne Marie Goetz & John Gaventa, Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery (Institute of Development Studies, Working Paper No. 138, 2001) (arguing that citizens must directly influence policy and spending decisions in order to intensify engagement with public service providers); Ricardo Hausmann & Dani Rodrik, Economic Development as Self-Discovery (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/selfdisc.pdf (emphasizing key role of self-learning about optimal production activities in development of growing economies); Dani Rodrik et al., Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/institutionsrule,%205.0.pdf (arguing that quality of institutions is more determinative of income levels than are other factors such as geography and trade).
101. For some examples of recent interdisciplinary scholarship studying these trends, see, for example, FRANK I. MICHELMAN, BRENNAN AND DEMOCRACY (1999) (describing Brennan's judicial activism as model for successful blending of participatory democracy and legal constitutionalism); STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN, DISSENT, INJUSTICE, AND THE MEANINGS OF AMERICA (1999) (contending that dissent, as essential tool for combating injustice and promoting progressive change, must be encouraged by our institutions rather than merely tolerated or even restricted); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER & CORNEL WEST, THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM: AN INITIATIVE FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC REFORM (1998) (advocating flexibility in institutional structure as prerequisite to reforms that seek to combat injustice); Susan Helper et al., Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism, 9 INDUS. & CORP. CHANGE 443 (2000) (claiming that collaborative learning explains existence of certain organizational forms that traditional theory of firms would not predict); Frank I. Michelman, Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World, in 28 NOMOS: JUSTIFICATION 71 (J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman eds., 1986) (arguing that moral legitimacy of autonomous legal institution is not incompatible with democratic system in which citizens cannot fully separate themselves from public corpus); Cornwall & Gaventa, supra note 4 (advocating greater citizen participation in social policy formation); Anne Marie Goetz & John Gaventa, Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery (Institute of Development Studies, Working Paper No. 138, 2001) (arguing that citizens must directly influence policy and spending decisions in order to intensify engagement with public service providers); Ricardo Hausmann & Dani Rodrik, Economic Development as Self-Discovery (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/selfdisc.pdf (emphasizing key role of self-learning about optimal production activities in development of growing economies); Dani Rodrik et al., Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/institutionsrule,%205.0.pdf (arguing that quality of institutions is more determinative of income levels than are other factors such as geography and trade).
102. For some examples of recent interdisciplinary scholarship studying these trends, see, for example, FRANK I. MICHELMAN, BRENNAN AND DEMOCRACY (1999) (describing Brennan's judicial activism as model for successful blending of participatory democracy and legal constitutionalism); STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN, DISSENT, INJUSTICE, AND THE MEANINGS OF AMERICA (1999) (contending that dissent, as essential tool for combating injustice and promoting progressive change, must be encouraged by our institutions rather than merely tolerated or even restricted); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER & CORNEL WEST, THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM: AN INITIATIVE FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC REFORM (1998) (advocating flexibility in institutional structure as prerequisite to reforms that seek to combat injustice); Susan Helper et al., Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism, 9 INDUS. & CORP. CHANGE 443 (2000) (claiming that collaborative learning explains existence of certain organizational forms that traditional theory of firms would not predict); Frank I. Michelman, Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World, in 28 NOMOS: JUSTIFICATION 71 (J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman eds., 1986) (arguing that moral legitimacy of autonomous legal institution is not incompatible with democratic system in which citizens cannot fully separate themselves from public corpus); Cornwall & Gaventa, supra note 4 (advocating greater citizen participation in social policy formation); Anne Marie Goetz & John Gaventa, Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery (Institute of Development Studies, Working Paper No. 138, 2001) (arguing that citizens must directly influence policy and spending decisions in order to intensify engagement with public service providers); Ricardo Hausmann & Dani Rodrik, Economic Development as Self-Discovery (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/selfdisc.pdf (emphasizing key role of self-learning about optimal production activities in development of growing economies); Dani Rodrik et al., Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/institutionsrule,%205.0.pdf (arguing that quality of institutions is more determinative of income levels than are other factors such as geography and trade).
103. For some examples of recent interdisciplinary scholarship studying these trends, see, for example, FRANK I. MICHELMAN, BRENNAN AND DEMOCRACY (1999) (describing Brennan's judicial activism as model for successful blending of participatory democracy and legal constitutionalism); STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN, DISSENT, INJUSTICE, AND THE MEANINGS OF AMERICA (1999) (contending that dissent, as essential tool for combating injustice and promoting progressive change, must be encouraged by our institutions rather than merely tolerated or even restricted); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER & CORNEL WEST, THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM: AN INITIATIVE FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC REFORM (1998) (advocating flexibility in institutional structure as prerequisite to reforms that seek to combat injustice); Susan Helper et al., Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism, 9 INDUS. & CORP. CHANGE 443 (2000) (claiming that collaborative learning explains existence of certain organizational forms that traditional theory of firms would not predict); Frank I. Michelman, Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World, in 28 NOMOS: JUSTIFICATION 71 (J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman eds., 1986) (arguing that moral legitimacy of autonomous legal institution is not incompatible with democratic system in which citizens cannot fully separate themselves from public corpus); Cornwall & Gaventa, supra note 4 (advocating greater citizen participation in social policy formation); Anne Marie Goetz & John Gaventa, Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery (Institute of Development Studies, Working Paper No. 138, 2001) (arguing that citizens must directly influence policy and spending decisions in order to intensify engagement with public service providers); Ricardo Hausmann & Dani Rodrik, Economic Development as Self-Discovery (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/selfdisc.pdf (emphasizing key role of self-learning about optimal production activities in development of growing economies); Dani Rodrik et al., Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/institutionsrule,%205.0.pdf (arguing that quality of institutions is more determinative of income levels
104. For some examples of recent interdisciplinary scholarship studying these trends, see, for example, FRANK I. MICHELMAN, BRENNAN AND DEMOCRACY (1999) (describing Brennan's judicial activism as model for successful blending of participatory democracy and legal constitutionalism); STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN, DISSENT, INJUSTICE, AND THE MEANINGS OF AMERICA (1999) (contending that dissent, as essential tool for combating injustice and promoting progressive change, must be encouraged by our institutions rather than merely tolerated or even restricted); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER & CORNEL WEST, THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM: AN INITIATIVE FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC REFORM (1998) (advocating flexibility in institutional structure as prerequisite to reforms that seek to combat injustice); Susan Helper et al., Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism, 9 INDUS. & CORP. CHANGE 443 (2000) (claiming that collaborative learning explains existence of certain organizational forms that traditional theory of firms would not predict); Frank I. Michelman, Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World, in 28 NOMOS: JUSTIFICATION 71 (J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman eds., 1986) (arguing that moral legitimacy of autonomous legal institution is not incompatible with democratic system in which citizens cannot fully separate themselves from public corpus); Cornwall & Gaventa, supra note 4 (advocating greater citizen participation in social policy formation); Anne Marie Goetz & John Gaventa, Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery (Institute of Development Studies, Working Paper No. 138, 2001) (arguing that citizens must directly influence policy and spending decisions in order to intensify engagement with public service providers); Ricardo Hausmann & Dani Rodrik, Economic Development as Self-Discovery (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/selfdisc.pdf (emphasizing key role of self-learning about optimal production activities in development of growing economies); Dani Rodrik et al., Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/institutionsrule,%205.0.pdf (arguing that quality of institutions is more determinative of income levels than are other factors such as geography and trade).
105. For some examples of recent interdisciplinary scholarship studying these trends, see, for example, FRANK I. MICHELMAN, BRENNAN AND DEMOCRACY (1999) (describing Brennan's judicial activism as model for successful blending of participatory democracy and legal constitutionalism); STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN, DISSENT, INJUSTICE, AND THE MEANINGS OF AMERICA (1999) (contending that dissent, as essential tool for combating injustice and promoting progressive change, must be encouraged by our institutions rather than merely tolerated or even restricted); ROBERTO MANGABEIRA UNGER & CORNEL WEST, THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM: AN INITIATIVE FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC REFORM (1998) (advocating flexibility in institutional structure as prerequisite to reforms that seek to combat injustice); Susan Helper et al., Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism, 9 INDUS. & CORP. CHANGE 443 (2000) (claiming that collaborative learning explains existence of certain organizational forms that traditional theory of firms would not predict); Frank I. Michelman, Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World, in 28 NOMOS: JUSTIFICATION 71 (J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman eds., 1986) (arguing that moral legitimacy of autonomous legal institution is not incompatible with democratic system in which citizens cannot fully separate themselves from public corpus); Cornwall & Gaventa, supra note 4 (advocating greater citizen participation in social policy formation); Anne Marie Goetz & John Gaventa, Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery (Institute of Development Studies, Working Paper No. 138, 2001) (arguing that citizens must directly influence policy and spending decisions in order to intensify engagement with public service providers); Ricardo Hausmann & Dani Rodrik, Economic Development as Self-Discovery (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/selfdisc.pdf (emphasizing key role of self-learning about optimal production activities in development of growing economies); Dani Rodrik et al., Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development (2002) (unpublished manuscript), at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/institutionsrule,%205.0.pdf (arguing that quality of institutions is more determinative of income levels than are other factors such as geography and trade).
106. For a recent elaboration of New York City's approach and proposed citywide policy shifts, see JONATHAN BOWLES & JOEL KOTKIN, CTR. FOR AN URBAN FUTURE, ENGINE FAILURE (2003), available at http://nycfuture.org/content/reports/report_view.cfm.
107. See supra Part III.B.1.
108. COMM. ON L EGAL AID, N.Y. STATE BAR ASS'N, THE NEW YORK LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (1993) [hereinafter N.Y. LEGAL NEEDS STUDY].
109. PRESIDENT'S COMM. ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE & DEP'T OF PRO BONO AFFAIRS, N.Y. STATE BAR ASS'N, NEW YORK EFFORTS TO ADDRESS THE UNMET LEGAL NEEDS OF THE STATE'S POOR: SEPTEMBER, 1991 TO DECEMBER, 1993 (1994).
110. Such data have been collected nationally and in several states in a series of related studies. See, e.g., CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, AGENDA FOR ACCESS: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND CIVIL JUSTICE (1996), available at http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/publications/home.html [hereinafter AGENDA FOR ACCESS]; CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, LEGAL NEEDS AND CIVIL JUSTICE: A SURVEY OF AMERICANS (1994) [hereinafter ABA NATIONAL STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN CONNECTICUT: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, May 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN FLORIDA: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 9, 1995); KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN GEORGIA (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, June 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA GEORGIA STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN MASSACHUSETTS: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, July 5, 1994) [hereinafter ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY]; ROY W. REESE & CAROLYN A. ELDRED, LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 18, 1994) [hereinafter ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS]. Similar data have been elicited about particular problems in particular areas. See, e.g., ROBERT L. BACH, BECOMING AMERICAN, SEEKING JUSTICE: THE IMMIGRANTS' LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (1996) (describing data regarding legal needs of immigrants in major metropolitan areas); SEATTLE WOMEN'S RESOURCE PROJECT, POWERFUL VOICES: KING COUNTY WOMEN TALK ABOUT THEIR NEEDS (1995) (describing data related to women's legal services needs in Seattle); Robert L. Bach, Building Community Among Diversity: Legal Services for Impoverished Immigrants, 27 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 639 (1994) (presenting and interpreting data on legal needs of impoverished immigrants).
111. Such data have been collected nationally and in several states in a series of related studies. See, e.g., CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, AGENDA FOR ACCESS: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND CIVIL JUSTICE (1996), available at http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/publications/home.html [hereinafter AGENDA FOR ACCESS]; CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, LEGAL NEEDS AND CIVIL JUSTICE: A SURVEY OF AMERICANS (1994) [hereinafter ABA NATIONAL STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN CONNECTICUT: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, May 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN FLORIDA: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 9, 1995); KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN GEORGIA (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, June 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA GEORGIA STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN MASSACHUSETTS: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, July 5, 1994) [hereinafter ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY]; ROY W. REESE & CAROLYN A. ELDRED, LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 18, 1994) [hereinafter ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS]. Similar data have been elicited about particular problems in particular areas. See, e.g., ROBERT L. BACH, BECOMING AMERICAN, SEEKING JUSTICE: THE IMMIGRANTS' LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (1996) (describing data regarding legal needs of immigrants in major metropolitan areas); SEATTLE WOMEN'S RESOURCE PROJECT, POWERFUL VOICES: KING COUNTY WOMEN TALK ABOUT THEIR NEEDS (1995) (describing data related to women's legal services needs in Seattle); Robert L. Bach, Building Community Among Diversity: Legal Services for Impoverished Immigrants, 27 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 639 (1994) (presenting and interpreting data on legal needs of impoverished immigrants).
112. Such data have been collected nationally and in several states in a series of related studies. See, e.g., CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, AGENDA FOR ACCESS: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND CIVIL JUSTICE (1996), available at http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/publications/home.html [hereinafter AGENDA FOR ACCESS]; CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, LEGAL NEEDS AND CIVIL JUSTICE: A SURVEY OF AMERICANS (1994) [hereinafter ABA NATIONAL STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN CONNECTICUT: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, May 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN FLORIDA: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 9, 1995); KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN GEORGIA (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, June 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA GEORGIA STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN MASSACHUSETTS: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, July 5, 1994) [hereinafter ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY]; ROY W. REESE & CAROLYN A. ELDRED, LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 18, 1994) [hereinafter ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS]. Similar data have been elicited about particular problems in particular areas. See, e.g., ROBERT L. BACH, BECOMING AMERICAN, SEEKING JUSTICE: THE IMMIGRANTS' LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (1996) (describing data regarding legal needs of immigrants in major metropolitan areas); SEATTLE WOMEN'S RESOURCE PROJECT, POWERFUL VOICES: KING COUNTY WOMEN TALK ABOUT THEIR NEEDS (1995) (describing data related to women's legal services needs in Seattle); Robert L. Bach, Building Community Among Diversity: Legal Services for Impoverished Immigrants, 27 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 639 (1994) (presenting and interpreting data on legal needs of impoverished immigrants).
113. Such data have been collected nationally and in several states in a series of related studies. See, e.g., CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, AGENDA FOR ACCESS: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND CIVIL JUSTICE (1996), available at http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/publications/home.html [hereinafter AGENDA FOR ACCESS]; CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, LEGAL NEEDS AND CIVIL JUSTICE: A SURVEY OF AMERICANS (1994) [hereinafter ABA NATIONAL STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN CONNECTICUT: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, May 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN FLORIDA: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 9, 1995); KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN GEORGIA (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, June 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA GEORGIA STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN MASSACHUSETTS: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, July 5, 1994) [hereinafter ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY]; ROY W. REESE & CAROLYN A. ELDRED, LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 18, 1994) [hereinafter ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS]. Similar data have been elicited about particular problems in particular areas. See, e.g., ROBERT L. BACH, BECOMING AMERICAN, SEEKING JUSTICE: THE IMMIGRANTS' LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (1996) (describing data regarding legal needs of immigrants in major metropolitan areas); SEATTLE WOMEN'S RESOURCE PROJECT, POWERFUL VOICES: KING COUNTY WOMEN TALK ABOUT THEIR NEEDS (1995) (describing data related to women's legal services needs in Seattle); Robert L. Bach, Building Community Among Diversity: Legal Services for Impoverished Immigrants, 27 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 639 (1994) (presenting and interpreting data on legal needs of impoverished immigrants).
114. Such data have been collected nationally and in several states in a series of related studies. See, e.g., CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, AGENDA FOR ACCESS: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND CIVIL JUSTICE (1996), available at http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/publications/home.html [hereinafter AGENDA FOR ACCESS]; CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, LEGAL NEEDS AND CIVIL JUSTICE: A SURVEY OF AMERICANS (1994) [hereinafter ABA NATIONAL STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN CONNECTICUT: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, May 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN FLORIDA: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 9, 1995); KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN GEORGIA (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, June 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA GEORGIA STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN MASSACHUSETTS: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, July 5, 1994) [hereinafter ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY]; ROY W. REESE & CAROLYN A. ELDRED, LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 18, 1994) [hereinafter ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS]. Similar data have been elicited about particular problems in particular areas. See, e.g., ROBERT L. BACH, BECOMING AMERICAN, SEEKING JUSTICE: THE IMMIGRANTS' LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (1996) (describing data regarding legal needs of immigrants in major metropolitan areas); SEATTLE WOMEN'S RESOURCE PROJECT, POWERFUL VOICES: KING COUNTY WOMEN TALK ABOUT THEIR NEEDS (1995) (describing data related to women's legal services needs in Seattle); Robert L. Bach, Building Community Among Diversity: Legal Services for Impoverished Immigrants, 27 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 639 (1994) (presenting and interpreting data on legal needs of impoverished immigrants).
115. Such data have been collected nationally and in several states in a series of related studies. See, e.g., CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, AGENDA FOR ACCESS: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND CIVIL JUSTICE (1996), available at http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/publications/home.html [hereinafter AGENDA FOR ACCESS]; CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, LEGAL NEEDS AND CIVIL JUSTICE: A SURVEY OF AMERICANS (1994) [hereinafter ABA NATIONAL STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN CONNECTICUT: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, May 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN FLORIDA: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 9, 1995); KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN GEORGIA (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, June 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA GEORGIA STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN MASSACHUSETTS: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, July 5, 1994) [hereinafter ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY]; ROY W. REESE & CAROLYN A. ELDRED, LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 18, 1994) [hereinafter ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS]. Similar data have been elicited about particular problems in particular areas. See, e.g., ROBERT L. BACH, BECOMING AMERICAN, SEEKING JUSTICE: THE IMMIGRANTS' LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (1996) (describing data regarding legal needs of immigrants in major metropolitan areas); SEATTLE WOMEN'S RESOURCE PROJECT, POWERFUL VOICES: KING COUNTY WOMEN TALK ABOUT THEIR NEEDS (1995) (describing data related to women's legal services needs in Seattle); Robert L. Bach, Building Community Among Diversity: Legal Services for Impoverished Immigrants, 27 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 639 (1994) (presenting and interpreting data on legal needs of impoverished immigrants).
116. Such data have been collected nationally and in several states in a series of related studies. See, e.g., CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, AGENDA FOR ACCESS: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND CIVIL JUSTICE (1996), available at http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/publications/home.html [hereinafter AGENDA FOR ACCESS]; CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, LEGAL NEEDS AND CIVIL JUSTICE: A SURVEY OF AMERICANS (1994) [hereinafter ABA NATIONAL STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN CONNECTICUT: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, May 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN FLORIDA: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 9, 1995); KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN GEORGIA (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, June 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA GEORGIA STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN MASSACHUSETTS: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, July 5, 1994) [hereinafter ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY]; ROY W. REESE & CAROLYN A. ELDRED, LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 18, 1994) [hereinafter ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS]. Similar data have been elicited about particular problems in particular areas. See, e.g., ROBERT L. BACH, BECOMING AMERICAN, SEEKING JUSTICE: THE IMMIGRANTS' LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (1996) (describing data regarding legal needs of immigrants in major metropolitan areas); SEATTLE WOMEN'S RESOURCE PROJECT, POWERFUL VOICES: KING COUNTY WOMEN TALK ABOUT THEIR NEEDS (1995) (describing data related to women's legal services needs in Seattle); Robert L. Bach, Building Community Among Diversity: Legal Services for Impoverished Immigrants, 27 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 639 (1994) (presenting and interpreting data on legal needs of impoverished immigrants).
117. Such data have been collected nationally and in several states in a series of related studies. See, e.g., CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, AGENDA FOR ACCESS: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND CIVIL JUSTICE (1996), available at http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/publications/home.html [hereinafter AGENDA FOR ACCESS]; CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, LEGAL NEEDS AND CIVIL JUSTICE: A SURVEY OF AMERICANS (1994) [hereinafter ABA NATIONAL STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN CONNECTICUT: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, May 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN FLORIDA: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 9, 1995); KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN GEORGIA (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, June 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA GEORGIA STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN MASSACHUSETTS: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, July 5, 1994) [hereinafter ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY]; ROY W. REESE & CAROLYN A. ELDRED, LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 18, 1994) [hereinafter ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS]. Similar data have been elicited about particular problems in particular areas. See, e.g., ROBERT L. BACH, BECOMING AMERICAN, SEEKING JUSTICE: THE IMMIGRANTS' LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (1996) (describing data regarding legal needs of immigrants in major metropolitan areas); SEATTLE WOMEN'S RESOURCE PROJECT, POWERFUL VOICES: KING COUNTY WOMEN TALK ABOUT THEIR NEEDS (1995) (describing data related to women's legal services needs in Seattle); Robert L. Bach, Building Community Among Diversity: Legal Services for Impoverished Immigrants, 27 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 639 (1994) (presenting and interpreting data on legal needs of impoverished immigrants).
118. Such data have been collected nationally and in several states in a series of related studies. See, e.g., CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, AGENDA FOR ACCESS: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND CIVIL JUSTICE (1996), available at http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/publications/home.html [hereinafter AGENDA FOR ACCESS]; CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, LEGAL NEEDS AND CIVIL JUSTICE: A SURVEY OF AMERICANS (1994) [hereinafter ABA NATIONAL STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN CONNECTICUT: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, May 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN FLORIDA: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 9, 1995); KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN GEORGIA (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, June 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA GEORGIA STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN MASSACHUSETTS: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, July 5, 1994) [hereinafter ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY]; ROY W. REESE & CAROLYN A. ELDRED, LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 18, 1994) [hereinafter ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS]. Similar data have been elicited about particular problems in particular areas. See, e.g., ROBERT L. BACH, BECOMING AMERICAN, SEEKING JUSTICE: THE IMMIGRANTS' LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (1996) (describing data regarding legal needs of immigrants in major metropolitan areas); SEATTLE WOMEN'S RESOURCE PROJECT, POWERFUL VOICES: KING COUNTY WOMEN TALK ABOUT THEIR NEEDS (1995) (describing data related to women's legal services needs in Seattle); Robert L. Bach, Building Community Among Diversity: Legal Services for Impoverished Immigrants, 27 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 639 (1994) (presenting and interpreting data on legal needs of impoverished immigrants).
119. Such data have been collected nationally and in several states in a series of related studies. See, e.g., CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, AGENDA FOR ACCESS: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND CIVIL JUSTICE (1996), available at http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/publications/home.html [hereinafter AGENDA FOR ACCESS]; CONSORTIUM ON LEGAL SERVS. AND THE PUB., AM. BAR ASS'N, LEGAL NEEDS AND CIVIL JUSTICE: A SURVEY OF AMERICANS (1994) [hereinafter ABA NATIONAL STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN CONNECTICUT: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, May 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN FLORIDA: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Public, Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 9, 1995); KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN GEORGIA (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, June 20, 1994) [hereinafter ABA GEORGIA STUDY]; KARL R. LANDIS ET AL., LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN MASSACHUSETTS: FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, July 5, 1994) [hereinafter ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY]; ROY W. REESE & CAROLYN A. ELDRED, LEGAL NEEDS AMONG LOW-INCOME AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (submitted to Consortium on Legal Servs. and the Pub., Am. Bar Ass'n, Jan. 18, 1994) [hereinafter ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS]. Similar data have been elicited about particular problems in particular areas. See, e.g., ROBERT L. BACH, BECOMING AMERICAN, SEEKING JUSTICE: THE IMMIGRANTS' LEGAL NEEDS STUDY (1996) (describing data regarding legal needs of immigrants in major metropolitan areas); SEATTLE WOMEN'S RESOURCE PROJECT, POWERFUL VOICES: KING COUNTY WOMEN TALK ABOUT THEIR NEEDS (1995) (describing data related to women's legal services needs in Seattle); Robert L. Bach, Building Community Among Diversity: Legal Services for Impoverished Immigrants, 27 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 639 (1994) (presenting and interpreting data on legal needs of impoverished immigrants).
120. These studies typically define legal problems, at least tacitly, as those lawyers would identify as formally cognizable causes of action. See, e.g., N.Y. LEGAL NEEDS STUDY, supra note 14, at xii (describing intent to study legal services "in judicial and administrative forums").
121. For a sketch of this experiential process, drawing on then available interdisciplinary research and my own ethnographic observations, see López, The Work We Know So Little About, supra note 6.
122. In recent years, a sequence of related "legal needs" studies self-consciously began to embrace in their aims and methods certain advances in cognitive disciplines and provided us inspiration for what we hoped to do with the NLN&RP. Perhaps reflecting particular mandates of funders, these studies characteristically drew bright lines between civil and criminal problems and focused considerably more on professional legal resources than on the assortment of institutions and individuals to whom people regularly turn for help. See, e.g., ABA NATIONAL STUDY, supra note 16 (studying civil legal needs only and frequency with which low and moderate-income individuals receive formal legal assistance); ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, supra note 16 (same).
123. In recent years, a sequence of related "legal needs" studies self-consciously began to embrace in their aims and methods certain advances in cognitive disciplines and provided us inspiration for what we hoped to do with the NLN&RP. Perhaps reflecting particular mandates of funders, these studies characteristically drew bright lines between civil and criminal problems and focused considerably more on professional legal resources than on the assortment of institutions and individuals to whom people regularly turn for help. See, e.g., ABA NATIONAL STUDY, supra note 16 (studying civil legal needs only and frequency with which low and moderate-income individuals receive formal legal assistance); ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, supra note 16 (same).
124. See studies cited supra note 19.
125. For a description of Alabama's system, see Ruth E. Friedman & Bryan A. Stevenson, Solving Alabama's Capital Defense Problems: It's a Dollars and Sense Thing, 44 ALA. L. REV. 1, 21-26 (1992).
126. A small cluster of contemporary studies importantly inquire about and document these more "informal" systems. See, e.g., AGENDA FOR ACCESS, supra note 16; ABA NATIONAL STUDY, supra note 16; ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, supra note 16.
127. A small cluster of contemporary studies importantly inquire about and document these more "informal" systems. See, e.g., AGENDA FOR ACCESS, supra note 16; ABA NATIONAL STUDY, supra note 16; ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, supra note 16.
128. A small cluster of contemporary studies importantly inquire about and document these more "informal" systems. See, e.g., AGENDA FOR ACCESS, supra note 16; ABA NATIONAL STUDY, supra note 16; ABA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, supra note 16.
129. For one branch of promising "network" literature, see H. Brinton Milward & Keith G. Provan, How Networks Are Governed, in GOVERNANCE AND PERFORMANCE: NEW PERSPECTIVES 238 (Carolyn J. Heinrich & Laurence E. Lynn, Jr. eds., 2000) (discussing institutional design imperatives for networks of public service organizations); Keith G. Provan & H. Brinton Milward, Do Networks Really Work?: A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks, 61 PUB. ADMIN. REV. 414 (2001) (analyzing effectiveness of interorganizational networks of public service providers on community, network, and participant levels).
130. For one branch of promising "network" literature, see H. Brinton Milward & Keith G. Provan, How Networks Are Governed, in GOVERNANCE AND PERFORMANCE: NEW PERSPECTIVES 238 (Carolyn J. Heinrich & Laurence E. Lynn, Jr. eds., 2000) (discussing institutional design imperatives for networks of public service organizations); Keith G. Provan & H. Brinton Milward, Do Networks Really Work?: A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks, 61 PUB. ADMIN. REV. 414 (2001) (analyzing effectiveness of interorganizational networks of public service providers on community, network, and participant levels).
131. Certain publicly available studies have gathered some information about client perceptions of the quality of legal services. See, e.g., ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY, supra note 16; ABA GEORGIA STUDY, supra note 16; ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY, supra note 16; ABA NATIONAL STUDY, supra note 16. And confidential studies capture more extensively how well client populations regard the problem-solving help they have received. Cf. ED KISSAM AND IDA JETER, FINAL REPORT: EVALUATION OF THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIZENSHIP PROJECT 14 & n.11 (1999) (calling for more study of clients' opinions so service providers can "make rational policy decisions").
132. Certain publicly available studies have gathered some information about client perceptions of the quality of legal services. See, e.g., ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY, supra note 16; ABA GEORGIA STUDY, supra note 16; ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY, supra note 16; ABA NATIONAL STUDY, supra note 16. And confidential studies capture more extensively how well client populations regard the problem-solving help they have received. Cf. ED KISSAM AND IDA JETER, FINAL REPORT: EVALUATION OF THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIZENSHIP PROJECT 14 & n.11 (1999) (calling for more study of clients' opinions so service providers can "make rational policy decisions").
133. Certain publicly available studies have gathered some information about client perceptions of the quality of legal services. See, e.g., ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY, supra note 16; ABA GEORGIA STUDY, supra note 16; ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY, supra note 16; ABA NATIONAL STUDY, supra note 16. And confidential studies capture more extensively how well client populations regard the problem-solving help they have received. Cf. ED KISSAM AND IDA JETER, FINAL REPORT: EVALUATION OF THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIZENSHIP PROJECT 14 & n.11 (1999) (calling for more study of clients' opinions so service providers can "make rational policy decisions").
134. Certain publicly available studies have gathered some information about client perceptions of the quality of legal services. See, e.g., ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY, supra note 16; ABA GEORGIA STUDY, supra note 16; ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY, supra note 16; ABA NATIONAL STUDY, supra note 16. And confidential studies capture more extensively how well client populations regard the problem-solving help they have received. Cf. ED KISSAM AND IDA JETER, FINAL REPORT: EVALUATION OF THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIZENSHIP PROJECT 14 & n.11 (1999) (calling for more study of clients' opinions so service providers can "make rational policy decisions").
135. Certain publicly available studies have gathered some information about client perceptions of the quality of legal services. See, e.g., ABA CONNECTICUT STUDY, supra note 16; ABA GEORGIA STUDY, supra note 16; ABA MASSACHUSETTS STUDY, supra note 16; ABA NATIONAL STUDY, supra note 16. And confidential studies capture more extensively how well client populations regard the problem-solving help they have received. Cf. ED KISSAM AND IDA JETER, FINAL REPORT: EVALUATION OF THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIZENSHIP PROJECT 14 & n.11 (1999) (calling for more study of clients' opinions so service providers can "make rational policy decisions").
136. See, e.g., studies cited supra note 16.
137. We drew these lessons from studies cited supra note 16.
138. For one example of a continuing project sustained over multiple funding cycles, see DAVID VLAHOV, NATURAL HISTORY OF HIV INFECTION AMONG DRUG USERS, THE ALIVE STUDY (1998), at http://www.rand.org/health/chipts/projects/proj064.html (last visited Mar. 1, 2004) (describing project that began in 1987 and that has operated continuously since).
139. We pulled together various readings from those I cite supra note 6.
140. CTR. FOR THE PRACTICE & STUDY OF CMTY. PROBLEM SOLVING, TRAINING PACKET FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL NEEDS & RESOURCES PROJECT (2003) [on file with New York University Law Review].