Evaluating decision aids - Where next?

Health Expectations

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 98-103

  O'Cathain, Alicia ^a   Thomas, Kate J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barriers to implementation; Decision aids; Pragmatic randomized controlled trials

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION AID; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; IMPLEMENTATION BARRIER; MATERNAL CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW;

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 2442704064     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00258.x     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H et al. Decision aids for patients facing treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 1999; 319: 731-734.
2. Molenaar S, Sprangers MAG, Postma-Schuit FCE, Rutgers EJT, Noorlander J, Hendriks J et al. Feasibility and effects of decision aids. Medical Decision Making, 2000; 20: 112-127.
3. Estabrooks C, Goel V, Thiel E, Pinfold P, Sawka C, Williams I. Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 2001; 6: 170-182.
4. O'Cathain A, Walter SJ, Nicholl JP, Thomas KJ, Kirkham M. Use of evidence based leaflets to promote informed choice in maternity care: randomised controlled trial in everyday practice. British Medical Journal, 2002; 324: 643-636.
5. Stapleton H, Kirkham M, Thomas G. Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. British Medical Journal, 2002; 324: 639-643.
6. Murray E, Davis H, See Tai S, Coulter A, Gray A, Haines A. Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. British Medical Journal, 2001; 323: 493-496.
7. Kennedy ADM, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A et al. Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA, 2002; 288: 2701-2708.
8. Holmes-Rovner M, Valade D, Orlowski C, Draus C, Valerio-Nabornzy B, Keiser S. Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities. Health Expectations, 2000; 3: 182-191.
9. Eccles M, McColl E, Steen N et al. Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 2002; 325: 941-944.
10. Morrison J, Carroll L, Twaddle S et al. Pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate guidelines for the management of infertility across the primary caresecondary care interface. British Medical Journal, 2001; 322: 1282-1284.
11. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. British Medical Journal, 1998; 317: 858-861.
12. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Effective Health Care. Getting evidence into practice. York: University of York, 1999.
13. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R et al. Changing provider behaviour: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Medical Care, 2001; 39(Suppl. 2): 2-45.
14. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P. Shared decisionmaking in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation. British Journal of General Practice, 1999; 49: 477-482.
15. Edwards A, Elwyn G. Developing professional ability to involve patients in their care: pull or push? (editorial).Quality in Health Care, 2001; 10: 129-134.
16. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Gwyn R, Grol R. Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars. British Medical Journal, 1999; 319: 753-756.
17. Say RE, Thomson R. The importance of patients preferences in treatment decisions - challenges for doctors. British Medical Journal, 2003; 327: 542-545.
18. Freeman AC, Sweeney K. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 2001; 323: 1100-1102.
19. Simpson WM, Johnstone FD, Boyd FM, Goldberg DJ, Hart GJ, Prescott RJ. Uptake and acceptability of antenatal HIV testing: randomised controlled trial of different methods of offering the test. British Medical Journal, 1998; 316: 262-267.
20. Fitzgerald L, Ferlie E, Wood M, Hawkins C. Evidence into practice? An exploratory analysis of the interpretation of evidence. In: Mark AL, Dopson S (eds) Organisational behaviour in healthcare. London: The Research Agenda, 1999.
21. Paterson B. Myth of empowerment in chronic illness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2001; 34: 574-581.
22. Rousseau N, McColl E, Newton J, Grimshaw J, Eccles M. Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. British Medical Journal, 2003; 326: 314-318.
23. Moore L, Campbell R, Whelan A et al. Self help smoking cessation in pregnancy: cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 2002; 325: 1383-1386.
24. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, Maclennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L et al. Guideline dissemination and implementation strategies: a systematic review of effectiveness and efficiency. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Society for Social Medicine Annual Scientific Meeting, 2003, 57(Suppl. I)A6.
25. Entwistle VA, Sheldon TA, Sowden A, Watt IS. Evidence-informed patient choice. Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1998; 14: 212-225.