Experimental functional analysis of self-expanding stents using a new developed ex vivo model

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 374-383

  Grenacher, Lars ^a   Gänger, Ellen ^a   Lubienski, Andreas ^a   Düx, Markus ^a   Kauffmann, Gunter W ^a   Richter, Götz M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aorta; Ex vivo model; Radial strength; Self expandable; Stents

Indexed keywords

SILICON;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; ARTICLE; AUTOLYSIS; BALLOON; CADAVER; CALCULATION; CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EX VIVO STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; ILIAC ARTERY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SELF EXPANDING STENT; STENT; THEORY;

EID: 2442697814     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000123315.19579.af     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Becker GJ. Intravascular stents. General principles and status of lower-extremity arterial applications. Circulation. 1991;83(suppl 1):122-136.
2. Duda SH, Wiskirchen J, Tepe G, et al. Physical properties of endovascular stents: an experimental comparison. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000; 11:645-654.
3. Dyet JF, Watts WG, Ettles DF, et al. Mechanical properties of metallic stents: how do these properties influence the choice of stent for specific lesions? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000;23:47-54.
4. Hodgson KJ. Limitations of peripheral angioplasty and the role of new devices. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular Surgery. Philadelphia, London, Toronto: Saunders Co.; 1995:369-394.
5. Manke C, Hackethal S, Müller-Hülsbeck S, et al. Ergebnisse nach Memotherm-Stent-Implantation in Becken- und Leistenarterien. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001;173:240-244.
6. Rabkin DJ, Lang EV, Brophy DP. Nitinol properties affecting uses in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:343-350.
7. Technisches Komitee CEN/TC 285 "Nichtaktive chirurgische Implantate" Nichtaktive chirurgische Implantate, Besondere Anforderungen an Herz- und Gefäßimplantate, Teil 3: Endovaskuläre Implantate, Deutsche Fassung EN 12006-3:1998 Beuth, Berlin
8. Lossef SV, Lutz RJ, Mundorf J, et al. Comparison of mechanical deformation properties of metallic stents with use of stress-strain analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5:341-349.
9. Schrader SC, Beyar R. Evaluation of the compressive mechanical properties of endoluminal metal stents. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998; 44:179-187.
10. Schröder B, Dück R, Kopf M. Untersuchungen zu den mechanischen Eigenschaften von metallischen Gefäßimplantaten (Stents). Biomed Tech (Berl). 1998;43(suppl):436-437.
11. Albrecht D, Kaspers S, Füssl R, et al. Coronary plaque morphology affects stent deployment: assessment by intracoronary ultrasound. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;38:229-235.
12. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Popma JJ, et al. Treatment of calcified coronary lesions with Palmaz-Schatz stents. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:1224-1231.
13. Schwarzenberg H, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Glüer CC, et al. Evaluation of maximum neointima proliferation and plaque morphology in iliac self-expanding nitinol stents with intravascular sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1627-1630.
14. Grenacher L, Deutsch J, Lubienski A, et al. Resistance to hoop stress in balloon expandable stents: evaluation in an "ex-vivo" model. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:65-72.
15. Thiel W. Die Konservierung ganzer Leichen in natürlichen Farben. Ann Anat. 1992;174:185-195.
16. Leclerc X, Godefroy O, Lucas C, et al. Internal carotid arterial stenosis: CT angiography with volume rendering. Radiology. 1999;210:673-682.
17. Flueckiger F, Sternthal H, Klein GE, et al. Strength, elasticity, and plasticity of expandable metal stents: in vitro studies with three types of stress. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5:745-750.
18. Schrader SC, Beyar R, Kühler M, et al. Experimentelle Untersuchung der radialen Verformbarkeit von Stents. Biomed Tech (Berl). 1998; 43(suppl):512-513.
19. Yamamoto Y, Brown DL, Ischinger TA, et al. Effect of stent design on reduction of elastic recoil: a comparison via quantitative intravascular ultrasound. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 1999;47:251-257.
20. Rieu R, Barragan P, Masson C, et al. Radial force of coronary stents: a comparative analysis. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 1999;46:380-391.
21. Schmitz KP, Behrend D, Behrens P, et al. Experimentelle Überprüfung des Aufweitverhaltens von ballonexpandierbaren Koronarstents. Biomed Tech (Berl). 1997;42(suppl):203-204.
22. Schmitz KP, Behrend D, Behrens P, et al. Wechselwirkung von Radialfestigkeit und Flexibilität von Koronarstents. Biomed Tech (Berl). 1998;43(suppl):376-377.
23. Wehrmeyer B, Kuhn FP. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Druckstabilität vaskulärer Endoprothesen. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 1993;158:242-246.
24. Pörner T, Voelker W, Teubner J, et al. Quantifizierung des Recoils von Koronarstents: eine in-vitro-Untersuchung an Koronarstenosemodellen mittels hochauflösender Röntgentechnik. Biomed Tech (Berl). 1997; 42(suppl):205-206.
25. Rousseau H, Joffre F, Raillat C, et al. Self-expanding endovascular stent in experimental atherosclerosis. Radiology. 1989;170:773-778.
26. Vernhet H, Demaria R, Juan JM, et al. Changes in wall mechanics after endovascular stenting in the rabbit aorta comparison of three stent designs. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;176:803-807.
27. Carrozza JP Jr., Hosley SE, Cohen DJ, et al. In vivo assessment of stent expansion and recoil in normal porcine coronary arteries, differential outcome by stent design. Circulation. 1999;100:756-760.
28. Grenadier E, Shofti R, Beyar M, et al. Self-expandable and highly flexible nitinol stent: immediate and long-term results in dogs. Am Heart J. 1994;128:870-878.
29. Palmaz JC, Windeler SA, Garcia F, et al. Atherosclerotic rabbit aortas: expandable intraluminal grafting. Radiology. 1986;160:723-726.
30. Oesterle SN, Whitbourn R, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. The stent decade: 1987 to 1997. Am Heart J. 1998;136:578-599.
31. Harnek J, Zoucas E, Carlemalm E, et al. Differences in endothelial injury after balloon angioplasty, insertion of balloon-expanded stents or release of self-expanding stents: an electron microscopic experimental study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1999;22:56-61.
32. Sheth S, Litvack F, Dev V, et al. Subacute thrombosis and vascular injury resulting from slotted-tube nitinol and stainless steel stents in a rabbit carotid artery model. Circulation. 1996;94:1733-1740.
33. Laerum F, Vlodaver Z, Castaneda-Zuniga WR, et al. The mechanism of angioplasty. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 1982;136:573-576.
34. Manninen HI, Räsänen HT, Vanninen RL, et al. Stent placement versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of human carotid arteries in cadavers in situ: distal embolization and findings at intravascular us, mr imaging, and histopathologic analysis. Radiology. 1999;212:483-492.
35. Schatz RA, Tio FO, Palmaz JC. Balloon expandable intravascular stents in diseased human cadaver coronary arteries. Circulation. 1987;76(suppl 4):4-26.
36. Palmaz JC. Balloon-expandable intravascular Stent. Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:1263-1269.
37. Kawasaki T, Sasayama S, Yagi SI, et al. Non-invasive assessment of the age related changes in stiffness of major branches of the human arteries. Cardiovasc Res. 1987;21:678-687.
38. Crowe D, O'Loughlin K, Knox L, et al. Morphologic change in rabbit femoral arteries induced by storage at four degrees Celsius and by subsequent reperfusion. J Vasc Surg. 1995;22:769-779.