Nitinol properties affecting uses in interventional radiology

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 343-350

  Rabkin, Dmitry J ^a   Lang, Elvira V ^a   Brophy, David P ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; NICKEL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CRYSTAL; DEVICE; ELASTICITY; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; METAL IMPLANTATION; PHASE TRANSITION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0034106765     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61428-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Schetky LM. Shape memory alloys. Sci Am 1979; 241:74-83.
2. Zaimovsky VA, Kolupaeva TL. Unusual properties of usual metals [in Russian]. Science 1984; 111-113.
3. Kurdiumov GV, Khandros LG. About a thermoelastic balance in martensite transformations [in Russian]. Rep Acad Sci USSR 1949; 66:2: 211-215.
4. Buehler WJ, Wang FE. A summary of recent research on the nitinol alloys and their potential application in ocean engineering. Ocean Eng 1968; 1:105-120.
5. Shmerling MA, Wilkov MA, Sanders AE, Woosley JE. Using the shape recovery of nitinol in the Harrington rod treatment of scoliosis. J Biomed Mater Res 1976; 10:879-892.
6. Wayman CM. Some applications of shape memory alloys. J Metals 1980; 32:129-137.
7. Dotter CT, Buschman RW, McKinney MK, Rosch J. Transluminal expandable Nitinol coil stent grafting. Radiology 1983; 147:259-260.
8. Castleman LS, Motzkin SM. Biocompatibility of Nitinol. In: Williams DF, ed. Biocompatibility of clinical implant materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1981; 129-154.
9. Oshida Y, Miyazaki S. Corrosion and biocompatibility of shape memory alloys. Corrosion Eng 1991; 40: 1009-1025.
10. Sunderman FW. Potential toxicity from nickel contamination of intravenous fluids. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1983; 13:1-4.
11. Prince MR, Salzman EW, Schoen FJ, Palestrant AM, Simon M. Local intravascular effects of the nitinol wire blood clot filter. Invest Radiol 1988; 23:294-300.
12. Rabkin DJ. Experimental basis of endovascular stenting. PhD Thesis, Moscow Institute of Radiology, Moscow, Russia, 1987. [Russian]
13. Shabalovskaya SA. On the nature of the biocompatibility and on medical applications on NiTi shape memory and superelastic alloys. Biomed Mater Eng 1996; 6:267-289.
14. Putters JL, Kaulesar Sukul DM, De Zeeuw GR, Bijma A, Besselink PA. Comparative cell culture effects of shape memory metal (Nitinol), nickel and titanium: a biocompatibility estimation. Eur Surg Res 1992; 24:378-382.
15. Kleshinski SJ, Harry JD. Medical stenting: a synthesis of design principles. In: Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies. Proc Int Conf 1997; 561-566.
16. Froelich JJ, Alfke H, Wilke A, et al. Effects of nitinol Strecker stent placement on vascular response in normal and stenotic porcine iliac arteries. JVIR 1999; 10:329-338.
17. Mangell P, Malina M, Vogt K, et al. Are self-expanding stents superior to balloon-expanded in dilating aortas? An experimental study in pigs. Eur J Endovasc Surg 1996; 12:287-294.
18. Ozaki Y, Violaris AG, Hamburger J, et al. Short and long-term clinical and quantitative angiographic results with the new, less shortening Wallstent for vessel reconstruction in chronic total occlusion: a quantitative angiographic study. JACC 1996; 28:354-360.
19. Tominaga R, Kambic H, Emoto H, Harasaki H, Sutton C, Hollman J. Effects of design geometry of intravascular endoprostheses on stenosis rate in normal rabbits. Am Heart J 1992; 123:21-28.