Dynamic imaging of pancreatic diseases by contrast enhanced coded phase inversion harmonic ultrasonoqraphy

Gut

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 854-859

  Kitano, M ^a   Kudo, M ^a   Maekawa, K ^a   Suetomi, Y ^a   Sakamoto, H ^a   Fukuta, N ^a   Nakaoka, R ^a   Kawasaki, T ^a  

^a KINKI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SHU 508;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOCRINE TUMOR; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENHANCED CODED PHASE INVERSION HARMONIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROVASCULATURE; PANCREAS TUMOR; PANCREATIC DUCTAL CARCINOMA; PLASMA CELL GRANULOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, PANCREATIC DUCTAL; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; POLYSACCHARIDES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 2442688927     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2003.029934     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ueno N, Tomiyama T, Tano S, et al. Contrast enhanced color Doppler ultrasonography in diagnosis of pancreatic tumor: two case reports. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:527-30.
2. Bhutani MS, Hoffman BJ, Velse A, et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography with galactose microparticles:SHU508A (Levovist). Endoscopy 1997;29:635-9.
3. Ricke J, Hänninen LE, Amthauer H, et al. Assessment of the vascularisation of endocrine tumors by stimulated acoustic emission of SHU 508A ultrasound contrast agent and color or power Doppler sonography. Invest Radiol 2000;4:253-9.
4. Becker D, Strobel D, Bernatik T, et al. Echo-enhanced color- and power-Doppler EUS for the discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc, 2001;53:784-9.
5. Ding H, Kudo M, Onda H, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: depiction of tumor parenchymal flow with intermittent harmonic power Doppler US during the early arterial phase in dual-display mode. Radiology 2001;220:349-56.
6. Ding H, Kudo M, Maekawa K, et al. Detection of tumor parenchymal blood flow in hepatic tumors: value of second harmonic imaging with a galactose-based contrast agent. Hepatol Res 2001;21:242-51.
7. Ding H, Kudo M, Onda H, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of pancreatic islet cell tumor: value of intermittent harmonic imaging. J Clin Ultrasound 2001;29:411-16.
8. Ding H, Kudo M, Onda H, et al. Contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography for evaluating treatment response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR 2001;176:661-6.
9. Rickes S, Unkrodt K, Neye H, et al. Differentiation of pancreatic tumours by conventional ultrasound, unenhanced and echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:1313-20.
10. Ding H, Kudo M, Onda H, et al. Evaluation of post-treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic US: comparison with dynamic CT. Radiology 2001;221:721-30.
11. Minami Y, Kudo M, Kawasaki T, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: value of coded phase-inversion harmonics. AJR 2003;180:703-8.
12. Wen YL, Kudo M, Minami Y, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: therapeutic response using contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic sonography. AJR 2003;181:57-63.
13. Wen YL, Kudo M, Zheng RQ, et al. Characterization of hepatic tumors: value of contrast-enhanced coded phase inverstion harmonic US. AJR 2004 (in press).
14. Minami Y, Kudo M, Kawasaki T, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for sonography undetectable for hepatocellular carcinoma in the hepatic dome: value of contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography associated with artificial pleural effusion. AJR 2004 (in press).
15. Kudo M. Contrast harmonic imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatic tumors. Tokyo: Springer, 2003.
16. Kato T, Tsukamoto Y, Naitoh Y, et al. Ultrasonographic and endoscopic ultrasonographic angiography in pancreatic mass lesions. Acta Radiologica 1995;36:381-7.
17. Koito K, Namieno T, Nagakawa T, et al. Inflammatory pancreatic masses: Differentiation from ductal carcinomas with contrast-enhanced sonography using carbon dioxide microbubbles. AJR 1997;169:1263-7.
18. Oshikawa O, Tanaka S, Ioka T, et al. Dynamic sonography of pancreatic tumors: comparison with dynamic CT. AJR 2002;178:1133-7.
19. Diehl SJ, Lehman KJ, Sandick M, et al. Pancreatic cancer: value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability. Radiology 1998;206:373-8.
20. Boland GW, O'Malley ME, Saez M, et al. Pancreatic-phase versus portal vein-phase helical CT of the pancreas: optimal temporal window for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. AJR 1999;172:605-8.
21. Zuccaro G, Sterling MJ. Endosonography in pancreatic disease: Differential diagnosis. In: van Dam J, Sivak MV, eds. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Philadelphia: Sounders, 1999:235-43.