Pancreatic cancer: Value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability

Radiology

Volumn 206, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 373-378

  Diehl, Steffen J ^a   Lehmann, Karl Jürgen ^a   Sadick, Maliha ^a   Lachmann, Ricarda ^a   Georgi, Max ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma; Computed tomography (CT), angiography; Computed tomography (CT), helical; Pancreas, neoplasms

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE; NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LAPAROTOMY; LIVER METASTASIS; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS ANGIOGRAPHY; PANCREAS CANCER; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031890182     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.206.2.9457188     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Warshaw AL, Fernandez-del-Castillo C. Pancreatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 455-465.
2. Rumstadt B, Trede M. Surgical therapy of pancreatic diseases. Radiologe 1996; 36:375-380.
3. Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, et al. Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 197:381-385.
4. Trede M, Hoffmeister WA. Die partielle duodenopankreatektomie bei pankreaskarzinom: indikation, technik, ergebnisse. In: Beger HG, Bittner R, eds. Das pankreaskarzinom. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1986; 269-282.
5. Freeny CF, Marks WM, Ryan JA, Traverso LW. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT. Radiology 1988; 166:125-133.
6. Freeny PC, Traverso LW, Ryan JA. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with dynamic computed tomography. Am J Surg 1993; 165:600-606.
7. Fishman EK, Wyatt SH, Ney DR, Kuhlman JE, Siegelman SS. Spiral CT of the pancreas with multiplanar display. AJR 1992; 159:1209-1215.
8. Harbaugh RE, Schlusselberg DS, Jeffery R, Hayden S, Cromwell LD, Pluta D. Three-dimensional computerized tomography angiography in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg 1992; 76:408-414.
9. Napel S, Marks MP, Rubin GD, et al. CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection. Radiology 1992; 185:607-610.
10. Ibukuro K, Charnsangavej C, Chasen MH, et al. Helical CT angiography with multiplanar reformation: techniques and clinical applications. RadioGraphics 1995; 15:671-682.
11. Spiessl B, Beahrs OH, Hermanek P, et al. TNM atlas: illustrated guide to the TNM/pTNM classification of malignant tumors. International Union against Cancer Series. 3rd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1992; 132-139.
12. Lu DS, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, Kadell B, Berger WL, Reber HA. Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic-versus hepatic-phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology 1996; 199:697-701.
13. Hollett MD, Jorgensen MJ, Jeffrey RB Jr. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual-phase helical CT. Radiology 1995; 195:359-361.
14. Niederau C, Grendell JH. Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: imaging techniques and tumor markers. Pancreas 1992; 7:66-86.
15. Gmeinwieser J, Feuerbach S, Hohenberger W, et al. Spiral-CT in diagnosis of vascular involvement in pancreatic cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 1995; 42:418-422.
16. Warschaw AL, Gu ZY, Wittenberg J, Waltmann AC. Preoperative staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 1990; 125:230-233.
17. Megibow AJ, Zhou XH, Rotterdam H, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resesectability - report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1995; 195:327-332.
18. Vellet AD, Romano W, Bach DB, Passi RB, Taves DH, Munk PL. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic ducts: comparative evaluation with CT and MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1992; 183:87-95.
19. Rosch T, Braig C, Gain T, et al. Staging of pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography: comparison with conventional sonography, computed tomography, and angiography. Gastroenterology 1992; 102:188-199.