What plausibly affects plausibility? Concept coherence and distributional word coheence as factors influencing plausibility judgments

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 185-197

  Connell, Louise ^a   Keane, Mark T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT COHERENCE; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PHENOMENOLOGY; PLAUSIBILITY; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; WORD COHERENCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 2442680273     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196851     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. BLACK, A., FREEMAN, P., & JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1986). Plausibility and the comprehension of text. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 51-60.
2. BURGESS, C., LIVESAY, K., & LUND, K. (1998). Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, discourse. Discourse Processes, 25, 211-257.
3. COLLINS, A., & MICHALSKI, R. (1989). The logic of plausible reasoning: A core theory. Cognitive Science, 13, 1-49.
4. CONNELL, L., & KEANE, M. T. (2003). PAM: A cognitive model of plausibility. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CD-ROM). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. CONNELL, L., & RAMSCAR, M. (2001). Using distributional measures to model typicality in categorization. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 226-231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. COSTELLO, F., & KEANE, M. T. (2000). Efficient creativity: Constraints on conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 24, 299-349.
7. COSTELLO, F., & KEANE, M. T. (2001). Alignment versus diagnosticity in the comprehension and production of combined concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 255-271.
8. DUFFY, S. A., HENDERSON, J. M., & MORRIS, R. K. (1989). Semantic facilitation of lexical access during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 791-801.
9. FRENCH, R. M., & LABIOUSE, C. L. (2002). Four problems with extracting human semantics from large text corpora. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 316-321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. GLENBERG, A. M., & ROBERTSON, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 379-401.
11. HALLDORSON, M., & SINGER, M. (2002). Inference processes: Integrating relevant knowledge and text information. Discourse Processes, 34, 145-161.
12. HAVILAND, S. E., & CLARK, H. H. (1974). What's new: Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 512-521.
13. HESS, D. J., FOSS, D. J., & CARROLL, P. (1995). Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 62-82.
14. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. KEANE, M. T. (1997). What makes an analogy difficult? The effects of order and causal structure in analogical mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 946-967.
16. KEANE, M. T., LEDGEWAY, T., & DUFF, S. (1994). Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models. Cognitive Science, 18, 287-334.
17. KINTSCH, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173-202.
18. KINTSCH, W., & VAN DIJK, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of text comprehension. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
19. LANDAUER, T. K., & DUMAIS, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
20. LAPATA, M., McDONALD, S., & KELLER, F. (1999). Determinants of adjective-noun plausibility. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 30-36). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
21. LEMAIRE, P., & FAYOL, M. (1995). When plausibility judgments supersede fact retrieval: The example of the odd-even effect on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 23, 34-48.
22. LUND, K., BURGESS, C., & ATCHLEY, R. A. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 660-665). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. LYNOTT, D., & RAMSCAR, M. J. A. (2001). Can we model conceptual combination using distributional information? In Proceedings of the Twelfth Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (pp. 1-10). Kildare, Ireland: NUI Maynooth.
24. MAYER, R. E., & BROMAGE, B. K. (1980). Different recall protocols for technical texts due to advance organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 206-255.
25. PICKERING, M. J., & TRAXLER, M. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 940-961.
26. REDER, L. M. (1979). The role of elaborations in memory for prose. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 221-234.
27. REDER, L. M. (1982). Plausibility judgments vs. fact retrieval: Alternative strategies for sentence verification. Psychological Review, 89, 250-280.
28. REDER, L. M., & ROSS, B. H. (1983). Integrated knowledge in different tasks: The role of retrieval strategy on fan effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 55-72.
29. REDER, L. M., WIBLE, C., & MARTIN, J. (1986). Differential memory changes with age: Exact retrieval versus plausible inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 72-81.
30. REDINGTON, M., CHATER, N., & FINCH, S. (1998). Distributional information: A powerful cue for acquiring syntactic categories. Cognitive Science, 22, 425-469.
31. SMITH, E. E., SHAFIR, E., & OSHERSON, D. (1993). Similarity, plausibility, and judgments of probability. Cognition, 49, 67-96.
32. SPEER, S. R., & CLIFTON, C., JR. (1998). Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 26, 965-978.
33. TRAXLER, M. J., & PICKERING, M. J. (1996). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 454-475.