Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade

Administration and Society

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 243-249

  Miller, Hugh T ^a  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442616056     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399704263964     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Berlin, I. (2000). The power of ideas (H. Hardy, Ed.). Princeton, NJ: University Press.
2. Bogason, P., Kensen, S., & Miller, H. T. (2002). Pragmatic, extra-formal democracy. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24(4), 675-692.
3. Box, R. C. (2002). Pragmatic discourse and administrative legitimacy. American Review of Public Administration, 32(4), 20-39.
4. Box, R. C., & King, C. S. (2000). The truth is elsewhere: Critical history. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 22(4), 751-771.
5. Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967.)
6. Evans, K. (2000). Reclaiming John Dewey. Democracy, inquiry, pragmatism, and public management. Administration & Society, 32(3), 308-328.
7. Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-228). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Foucault, M. (1991a). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87-104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Foucault, M. (1991b). Politics and the study of discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 53-72). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
11. McSwite, O. C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Miller, H. T. (2002). Situation-regarding intentionality. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24(1), 219-224.
13. Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (2001). The epistemic community. Administration and Society, 32(6), 668-685.
14. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. New York: Penguin.
15. Shields, P. M. (2003). The community of inquiry: Classical pragmatism and public administration. Administration & Society, 35(5), 510-538.
16. Snider, K. (1998). Living pragmatism: The case of Mary Parker Follett. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20(3), 274-286.
17. Spicer, M. W. (2003). Masks of freedom: An examination of Isaiah Berlin's ideas on freedom and their implications for public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 25(4), 545-588.
18. Stever, J. (2000). The parallel universe: Pragmatism and public administration. Administration & Society, 32(3), 453-457.
19. Stivers, C. (2002). Gender images in public administration (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.