Pragmatic discourse and administrative legitimacy

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 20-39

  Box, Richard C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442582755     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074002032001002     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Agger, B. (1992). The discourse of domination: From the Frankfurt School to postmodernism. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
2. Bennett, W. L. (1998). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. Political Science & Politics, 31, 741-761.
3. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1986). Democracy and capitalism: Property, community, and the contradictions of modern social thought. New York: Basic Books.
4. Box, R. C. (1995). Critical theory and the paradox of discourse. American Review of Public Administration, 25, 1-19.
5. Box, R. C. (1998). Citizen governance: Leading American communities into the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Campbell, J. (1995). Understanding John Dewey: Nature and cooperative intelligence. Chicago: Open Court.
7. Cornell, S. (1999). The other founders: Anti-federalism and the dissenting tradition in America, 1788-1828. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
8. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Athens, OH: Swallow.
9. Elshtain, J. B. (1981). Public man, private woman: Women in social and political thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Farmer, D. J. (1995). The language of public administration: Bureaucracy, modernity, and postmodernity. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
11. Farmer, D. J. (2000a). Great refusals and the administered life. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22, 640-646.
12. Farmer, D. J. (2000b). The ladder of organization-think: Beyond flatland. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22, 66-88.
13. Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1, 335-350.
14. Follett, M. P. (1918). The new state: Group organization the solution of popular government. New York: Longmans, Green.
15. Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Fraser, N.(1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17. Frazer, E., & Lacey,N. (1993). The politics of community: A feminist critique of the liberal-communitarian debate. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
18. Geuss, R. (1981). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Gruber, J. E. (1987). Controlling bureaucracies: Dilemmas in democratic governance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20. Hansen, K. N. (1998). Identifying facets of democratic administration: The empirical referents of discourse. Administration & Society, 30, 443-461.
21. Harmon, M. M. (1981). Action theory for public administration. New York: Longman.
22. James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longmans, Green.
23. Kellner, D. (1984). Herbert Marcuse and the crisis of Marxism. London: Macmillan.
24. King, C. S. (2000). Talking beyond the rational. American Review of Public Administration, 30, 271-291.
25. King, C. S., & Stivers, C. (1998). Government is us: Public administration in an anti-government era. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Kirlin, J. J. (1996). The big questions of public administration in a democracy. Public Administration Review, 56, 416-423.
27. Lincoln, Y. S., & Cuba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Simon & Schuster.
29. Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30. Lowi, T. J. (1993). Legitimizing public administration: A disturbed dissent. Public Administration Review, 53, 261-264.
31. Lynn, L. E., Jr. (2001). The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: What traditional public administration really stood for. Public Administration Review, 61, 144-160.
32. Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon.
33. Mattson, K. (1998). Creating a democratic republic: The struggle for urban participatory democracy during the Progressive Era. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
34. Matthews, R. K. (1984). The radical politics of Thomas Jefferson: A revisionist view. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
35. Mayer, J. P. (1969). Alexis de Tocqueville: Democracy in America. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
36. McSwite, O. C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. McSwite, O. C. (1998a). Liberalism (its present and future discontents) and the hope of collaborative pragmatism. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22, 271-278.
38. McSwite, O. C. (1998b). The new normativism and the discourse movement: A meditation. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20, 377-381.
39. McSwite, O. C. (2000). On the discourse movement - a self interview. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22, 49-65.
40. Miller, H. T. (1998): Method: The tail that wants to wag the dog. Administration & Society, 30, 462-470.
41. Miller, H. T., & Nunemaker, J. R. (1999). "Citizen governance" as image management in postmodern context. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21, 302-308.
42. Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 739-777.
43. Mouffe, C. (1996). Deconstruction, pragmatism and the politics of democracy. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Deconstruction and pragmatism (pp. 1-12). London: Routledge.
44. Mumford, L. (1950a). The pragmatic acquiescence. In G. Kennedy (Ed.), Pragmatism and American culture (pp. 36-49). Boston: Heath. (Original work published 1926)
45. Mumford, L. (1950b). The pragmatic acquiescence: A reply. In G. Kennedy (Ed.), Pragmatism and American culture (pp. 54-57). Boston: Heath. (Original work published 1927)
46. Patterson, P.M. (2000). Nonvirtue is not apathy: Warrants for discourse and citizen dissent. American Review of Public Administration, 30, 225-251.
47. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
48. Rohr, J. A. (1978). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values. New York: Marcel Dekker.
49. Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin.
51. Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. Ruscio, K. P. (1998). Giving reason and politics their due: A response to O.C. McSwite's Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22, 268-271.
53. Sandel, M. J. (1996). Democracy's discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Scott, F. E. (2000). Participative democracy and the transformation of the citizen. American Review of Public Administration, 30, 353-270.
55. Sementelli, A. J., & Herzog, R. J. (2000). Framing discourse in budgetary processes: Warrants for normalization and conformity. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22, 105-116.
56. Sinopoli, R. C. (1992). The foundations of American citizenship: Liberalism, the Constitution, and civic virtue. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57. Spicer, M. W., & Terry, L. D. (1993). Legitimacy, history, and logic: Public administration and the Constitution. Public Administration Review, 53, 239-246.
58. Stewart, D. W. (1992). Professionalism vs. democracy: Friedrich vs. Finer revisited. In R. B. Denhardt & B. R. Hammond (Eds.), Public administration in action: Readings, profiles, and cases (pp. 156-162). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
59. Stivers, C. (1994). The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public administration. Public Administration Review, 54, 364-369.
60. Stivers, C. (2000a). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the Progressive Era. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
61. Stivers, C. (2000b). Public administration theory as a discourse. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22, 132-139.
62. Ventriss, C. (2000). New public management: An examination of its influence on contemporary public affairs and its impact on shaping the intellectual agenda of the field. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22, 500-518.
63. Waldo, D. (1980). The enterprise of public administration: A summary view. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp.
64. Wamsley, G. L., Goodsell, C. T., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1987). The public administration and the governance process: Re focusing the American dialog. In R. C. Chandler (Ed.), A centennial history of the American administrative state (pp. 291-317). New York: Free Press.
65. White, O. F., Jr. (1998). The ideology of technocratic empiricism and the discourse movement in contemporary public administration: A clarification. Administration & Society, 30, 471-476.
66. Wood, G. S. (1969). The creation of the American republic, 1776-1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
67. Zanetti, L. A. (1997). Advancing praxis: Connecting critical theory with practice in public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 27, 145-167.
68. Zanetti, L. A., & Carr, A. (2000). Contemporary pragmatism in public administration: Exploring the limitations of the "third productive reply." Administration & Society, 32, 433-452.