Anatomy and biomechanics of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation

Current Opinion in Orthopaedics

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 133-141

  Potter, Benjamin K ^a   Lehman Jr , Ronald A ^a   Kuklo, Timothy R ^a,b  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Bone mineral density; Insertional torque; Pullout strength; Thoracic pedicle screw

Indexed keywords

APATITE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; BONE SCREW; DEVICE; DEVICE REMOVAL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NERVE CELL; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; REVIEW; SPINAL CORD; SPINE MALFORMATION; STRENGTH; SURGICAL ANATOMY; THORACIC SPINE; THORAX DEFORMITY; TORQUE; VERTEBRA;

EID: 2442610995     PISSN: 10419918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.bco.0000120511.04726.d6     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Harrington PR: Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962, 44:591.
2. Harrington PR: Technical details in relation to the successful use of instrumentation in scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1972, 3:49.
3. Harrington PR: The history and development of Harrington instrumentation, Clin Orthop 1973, 93:110.
4. Harrington PR, Dickson JH: An eleven-year clinical investigation of Harrington instrumentation: a preliminary report of 578 cases. Clin Orthop 1973, 93:113.
5. Luque ER: Segmental spine instrumentation: a method of rigid internal fixation of the spine to induce arthrodesis. Orthop Trans 1980, 4:391.
6. Luque ER Cardoso A: Segmental correction of scoliosis with rigid internal fixation. Orthop Trans 1977, 1:136.
7. Deleted in proof.
8. Roy-Camille R, Mazel C, Laville C: Roy-Camille posterior screw plate fixation for cervical, thoracic, lumbar spine and sacrum. In: Spinal Instrumentation. An HS, and Coder JM, eds. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1992:167-181.
9. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C: Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop 1986, 203:7-17.
10. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Kim JH, et al.: Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in the hypokyphotic spine: a comparison between multiple-hook and segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord 1999, 12:489-495.
11. Suk S, Lee C, Kim W, et al.: Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995, 20:1399-1405.
12. Suk S, Lee C, Min H, et al.: Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 1994, 18:341-346.
13. Ugur HC, Attar A, Uz A, et al.: Thoracic pedicle: surgical anatomic evaluation and relations. J Spinal Dis 2001, 14:39-45.
14. Zindrick MR: The role of transpedicular fixation systems for stabilization of the lumbar spine. Orthop Clin North Am 1991, 22:333-344.
15. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guilaumat M: New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 1988, 227:10-23.
16. Suk S, Kim WJ, Lee SM, et al.: Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine 2001, 26:2049-2057.
17. Liljenqvist UR, Halm HR, Link TM: Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997, 22:2239-2245.
18. Belmont PJ, Klemme WR, Dhawan A, Polly DW: In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine 2001, 26:2340-2346.
19. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE: Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine 1990, 15:11-14.
20. O'Brien MF, Lenke LG, Mardjetko S, et al.: Pedicle morphology in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is pedicle fixation an anatomically viable technique? Spine 2000, 25:2285-2293.
21. Alanay A, Cil A, Acaroglu E, et al.: Late spinal cord compression caused by pulled-out thoracic pedicle screws: a case report. Spine 2003, 28:E506-E510. Case report highlighting a previously unreported complication of reversible neurologic deficit secondary to pedicle screw pullout and compression of the neural elements.
22. Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, et al.: Determination of distal fusion level with segmental pedicle screw fixation in single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003, 28:484-491. Highlights the efficacy of pedicle screw instrumentation and the importance of determining fusion levels based on the relationship between the stable and neutral vertebrae.
23. Vaccaro A, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ, et al.: Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: Part I: morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996, 77:1193-1199.
24. Vaccaro A, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, et al.: Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995, 77:1200-1206.
25. Kothe R, O'Holleran JD, Liu W, et al.: Internal architecture of the thoracic pedicle. Spine 1996, 21:264-270.
26. Panjabi MM, O'Holleran JD, Crisco JJ, et al.: Complexity of the thoracic spine pedicle anatomy. Eur Spine J 1997, 6:19-24.
27. McCormack BM, Benzel EC, Adams MS, et al.: Anatomy of the thoracic pedicle. Neurosurgery 1996, 37:303-308.
28. Zindrick MR, Knight GW, Sartori MJ, et al.: Pedicle morphology of the immature thoracolumbar spine. Spine 2000, 25:2726-2735.
29. Stanescu S, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting R, et al.: Morphometric evaluation of the cervico-thoracic junction. Spine 1994, 19:2082-2088.
30. Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH, et al.: An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar or lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop 1986, 203:75-98.
31. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH, et al.: A biomechanical study of intrapedicular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop 1986, 203:99-112.
32. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, et al.: Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine 1997, 22:233-238.
33. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, et al.: Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine 1987, 12:160-166.
34. Ebraheim NA, Jabaly G, Xu R, et al.: Anatomic relations of the thoracic pedicle to the adjacent neural structures. Spine 1997, 22:1553-1557.
35. Liljenqvist UR, Allkemper T, Hackenberg L, et al.: Analysis of the vertebral morphology in idiopathic scoliosis with magnetic resonance imaging using multiplanar reconstructions. Paper presented at: Scoliosis Research Society Annual Meeting; Cleveland, OH. 2001.
36. Sjostrom L, Jacobsson O, Karlstrom G, et al.: CT analysis of pedicles and screw tracts after implant removal in thoracolumbar fractures. J Spinal Disord 1993, 6:225-231.
37. Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, et al.: Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine 1989, 14:367-372.
38. Kothe R, O'Holleran JD, Liu W, Panjabi MM: Internal architecture of the thoracic pedicle: an anatomic study. Spine 1996, 21:264-270.
39. Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V, et al.: Thoracic human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 1991, 16:888-901.
40. Carbone JJ, Tortolani J, Quartararo LG: Fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw fixation for thoracic and thoracolumbar injuries: technique and short-term complications. Spine 2003, 28:91-97. Clinical series highlighting the safety of thoracic pedicle screws placed under fluoroscopic guidance. Also emphasizes the greater tendency for screws to miss laterally as opposed to the feared medial violation, which occurred in only 2.4% of screws without neural injury.
41. Decoster TA, Heetderks DB, Downey DJ, et al.: Optimizing bone screw pull-out force. J Orthop Trauma 1990, 4:169-174.
42. Suk S, Lee JH: A study of the diameter and change of the vertebral pedicle after screw insertion. Paper presented at: Third Intermeeting SIROT/SIROT; October, 1994; Boston, MA.
43. O'Brien MF, Wood JB, Lowe TG, et al.: Thoracic pedicle vs. pedicle/rib fixation: a biomechanical study. Paper presented at: Scoliosis Research Society, 36th Annual Meeting; 2000; Cairns, Australia.
44. Morganstern W, Haher TR, Merola AA, et al.: A biomechanical analysis of thoracic pedicle screw placement: the extrapedicular pathway. Paper presented at: International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques (IMAST); 2000; Barcelona, Spain.
45. O'Brien MF, Lowe TG, Lenke LG, et al.: Pedicle screw vs. hook fixation in the thoracic spine: clinical and biomechanical implications. Paper presented at: 8th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques (IMAST); 2001; Paradise Island, Bahamas.
46. Hackenberg L, Link T, Liljenqvist U: Axial and tangential fixation strength of pedicle screws versus hooks in the thoracic spine in relation to bone mineral density. Spine 2002, 27:937-942.
47. Polly DW, Potter BK, Young S, et al.: Volumetric spinal canal intrusion: a comparison between hooks and screws. Spine 2004, 29:63-69. Computer modeling study introducing the concept of "volumetric intrusion" and highlighting the obligatory spinal canal impingement required by most hook fixation devices. Found that in contrast, screws must miss medially by 2 mm to have the same intrusion volume as an average hook and over 3 mm to produce the same intrusion as the largest hook.
48. Asnis SE: Cancellous bone screw thread design and holding power. J Orthop Trauma 1996, 10:426-429.
49. Kwok AW, Finkelstein JA, Woodside T, et al.: Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone. Spine 1996, 21:2429-2434.
50. Daftari TK, Horton WC, Hutton WC: Correlations between screw hole preparation, torque of insertion, and pullout strength for spinal screws. J Spinal Disord 1994, 2:139-145.
51. Brantley AGU, Mayfield JK, Koeneman JB, Clark KR: The effects of pedicle screw fit. Spine 1994, 19:1752-1758.
52. Lehman RA, Polly DW, Kuklo TR, et al.: Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 2003, 28:2058-2065. Biomechanical study determining the optimal insertion route for thoracic pedicle screws. Demonstrated that the straightforward trajectory resulted in significantly higher MIT as compared with the anatomic trajectory.
53. Barber JW, Boden SD, Ganey T, Hutton WC: Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws: does convergence affect axial pullout strength? J Spinal Disord 1998, 11:215-220.
54. Chapman JR, et al.: Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng 1996, 118:391-398.
55. Lehman RA, Potter BK, Kuklo TR, et al.: Probing for thoracic pedicle screw tract violation(s): is it valid? J Spinal Disord. In press. Delineates the relative intra- and interobserver reliability of probing for thoracic pedicle violations in a laboratory study. Determined that probing has good intraobserver reliability, but not interobserver reliability, in experienced hands and that the utility of the technique is experience dependent
56. George DC, Krag MH, Johnson CC, Vanhal ME: Hole preparation techniques for transpedicle screws: effect on pull-out strength from human cadaveric vertebrae. Spine 1991, 16:181-184.
57. Kuklo TR, Lehman RA: Effect of various tapping diameters on insertion of thoracic pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 2003, 28:2066-2071. Biomechanical study clearly demonstrating superior fixation of thoracic pedicle screws with undertapping of the pilot hole. Undertapping by 1 mm resulted in a 93% increase in MIT as compared with line-to-line tapping.
58. Soshi S, Shiba R, Kondo H, Murota K: An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine. Spine 1991, 16:1335-1341.
59. Wittenberg RH, Shea M, Swartz DE, et al.: Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusions. Spine 1991, 16:647-652.
60. Fogel GR, Reitman CA, Weiqiang L, Esses SI: Physical characteristics of polyaxial-headed pedicle screws and biomechanical comparison of load with their failure. Spine 2003, 28:470-473. Biomechanical study demonstrating that the polyaxial screw coupling failed prior to screw breakage in all of nine different instrumentation systems. Suggests that this may be a protective effect in preventing screw breakage in vivo.
61. Chiba M, McLain RF, Yerby SA, et al.: Short-segment pedicle instrumentation: biomechanical analysis of supplemental hook fixation. Spine 1996, 21:288-294.
62. Dick JC, Zdeblick TA, Bartel BD, Kunz DN: Mechanical evaluation of cross-link designs in rigid pedicle screw systems. Spine 1997, 22:370-375.
63. Lehman RA, Kuklo TR: Use of the anatomic trajectory for thoracic pedicle screw salvage after failure/violation using the straight-forward technique: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 2003, 28:2072-2077. Biomechanical study demonstrating the utility of the anatomic trajectory, proven biomechanically inferior to the straightforward trajectory by the same authors in an additional study outlined previously, as a salvage technique for revision of failed straightforward thoracic pedicle screws.
64. Hasegawa K, Takahashi HE, Uchiyama S, Hirano T: An experimental study of a combination method using a pedicles screw and laminar hook for the osteoporotic spine. Spine 1997, 22:958-963.
65. McLain RF, McKinley TO, Yerby SA, Smith TS: The effect of bone quality on pedicle screw loading in axial instability: a synthetic model. Spine 1997, 22:1454-1464.
66. Polly DW Jr, Orchowski JR, Ellenbogen RG: Revision pedicle screws: bigger, longer shims - what is best? Spine 1998, 23:1374-1379.
67. Law M, Tencer AF, Anderson PA: Caudocephalad loading of pedicle screws: mechanisms of loosening and methods of augmentation. Spine 1993, 18:2438-2443.
68. Motzkin NE, Chao EY, Wikenheiser MA, Lewallen DG: Pull-out strength of screws from polymethylmethacrylate cement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994, 76:320-323.
69. Lotz JC, Hu SS, Chiu DF, Yu M: Carbonated apatite cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. Spine 1997, 22:2716-2723.
70. Moore DC, Maitra RS, Farjo LA et al.: Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement Spine 1997, 22:1696-1705.
71. Yerby SA, Toh E, McLain RF: Revision of failed pedicle screws using hydroxyapatite cement: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 1998, 23:1657-1661.