Rethinking accountability in education: How should who hold whom accountable for what?

International Public Management Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 43-73

  Behn, Robert D ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442565020     PISSN: 10967494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Allen, Michael. 1999. Student Results and Teacher Accountability. A Policy Brief on Teacher Evaluation. Denver: Education Commission of the States.
2. Archer, Jeff. 1999. "New Teachers Abandon Field at Higher Rate." Education Week 18, no. 27: 1, 20-21.
3. Archer, Jeff. 2001. "Connecticut." Education Week 20, no. 17: 120-121.
4. Bardach, Eugene, and Cara Lessor. 1996. "Accountability in Human Services Collaboratives - For What? and To Whom?" Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6(2):197-224.
5. Behn, Robert D. 1997. "Linking Measurement and Motivation: A Challenge for Education." Advances in Educational Administration 5:15-58.
6. Behn, Robert D. 1998. "Cheating: Honest & Dishonest." The New Public Innovator 1, no. 1: 18-9.
7. Behn, Robert D. 2001. Rethinking Democratic Accountability Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press.
8. Behn, Robert D. 2003. Forthcoming. "Why Measure Performance: Different Purposes Require Different Measures." Public Administration Review.
9. Blum, Robert E. 2000. "Standards-Based Reform: Can It Make a Difference for Students." Peabody Journal of Education 75(4):90-113.
10. Bradley, Ann. 1999a. "Zeroing in on Teachers." Education Week 18, no. 17: 46-47, 49-52.
11. Bradley, Ann. 1999b. "States' Uneven Teacher Supply Complicates Staffing of Schools." Education Week 18, no. 26: 2, 10-11.
12. Brennan, Robert L. 2001. "Some Problems, Pitfalls, and Paradoxes in Educational Measurement." Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 20(4):6-18.
13. Bromley, Daniel W. 1998. "Expectations, Incentives, and Performance in American Schools." DÆDALUS 127(4):41-66.
14. Bush, George W. 2001a. Excerpt From Bush Statement Announcing Start of His Education Initiative. The New York Times, 24 January. See also: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/01/print/20010123-2.html, Internet.
15. Bush, George W. 2001b. Communication from The President of the United States Transmitting A Report for Nationwide Education Reform Entitled, "No Child Left Behind." House Document 107-34, 30 January. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
16. Bush, George W. 2001c. "President Urges Quick Passage of Education Plan in Radio Address." The White House (September 1) [cited 18 November 2002]. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/print/20010901-2.html, Internet.
17. Bush, George W. 2002. "President Emphasizes Teacher Quality in Radio Address." The White House (March 2) [cited 18 November 2002]. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020302.html, Internet.
18. Clinton, William Jefferson. 1999. "Urging Nation to 'Aim Higher,' Clinton Offers Proposals on Education, Retirement Security, Health Care." CQ Weekly, 23 January, 201-7.
19. Clotfelter, Charles T., and Helen F. Ladd. 1996. "Recognizing and Rewarding Success in Public Schools." Pp. 23-63 in Helen F. Ladd, ed., Holding Schools Accountable: Performance-Based Reform in Education. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
20. Coleman, James S., E.Q. Campbell, C.J. Hobson, J. McPartland, A. Mood, F. Weinfeld, and R. York. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. Curran, Bridget. 1999. Focusing on Results: Toward an Education Accountability System. Washington, D.C.: National Governors' Association.
22. Deming, W. Edwards. 1986. Out of Crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
23. Earl, Lorna, and Nancy Torrance. 2000. "Embedding Accountability and Improvement into Large-Scale Assessment: What Difference Does It Make?" Peabody Journal of Education 75(4):114-41.
24. Education Commission of the States. 1998. States with 'No Pass/No Drive' Restrictions: September 1998. Denver: Education Commission of the States.
25. Ferrechio, Susan. 1998. Parents Wanted for Conferences; Incentives Used to Lure Them. The Washington Times (of Washington, D.C.), 16 November.
26. Gewertz, Catherine. 2002. "New Mexico." Education Week 21, no. 17: 138-39.
27. Gormley, William T., Jr., and David L. Weimer. 1999. Organizational Report Cards. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
28. Gove, Philip B. 1968. Webster's New Dictionary of Synonyms Springfield, Mass.: G. & C. Merriam Company.
29. Gregovich, Terrel. 1999a. Governors Boldly Leading the Way. Backgrounder, 20 February. Washington, D.C.: National Governors' Association.
30. Gregovich, Terrel. 1999b. Nation's Governors Focus on Education Accountability. News release, 22 February. Washington, D.C.: National Governors' Association.
31. Hawthorne, Phyllis. 1974. Legislation by the States: Accountability and Assessment in Education. Denver: The Cooperative Accountability Project.
32. Henry, Gary T. 1996. "Community Accountability: A Theory of Information, Accountability, and School Improvement." Phi Delta Kappan 78, no. 1: 85-91.
33. Herzberg, Frederick. 1968. "One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees?" Harvard Business Review 46(1):53-62.
34. Herzberg, Frederick, Bernard Mausner, and Barbara Bloch Snyderman. [1959] 1993. The Motivation to Work. Reprint, New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
35. Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
36. Ingersoll, Richard M. 2001. "Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis." American Educational Research Journal 38:499-534.
37. Jayson, Sharon. 1999. AISD, Administrator Indicted: District and Deputy Superintendent Face Charges in TAAS Data Manipulation. The Austin American-Statesman, 7 April.
38. Johnston, Robert C. 1999a. "Turning Up the Heat: Creating Accountability for Students." Education Week 18, no. 17: 53-9.
39. Johnston, Robert C. 1999b. "Firm but Friendly Pressure." Education Week 18, no. 17: 54.
40. Johnston, Robert C. 1999c. "Texas Presses Districts in Alleged Test-Tampering Cases." Education Week 18, no. 27: 22.
41. Johnston, Robert C. 2000. "Chicago Parents Get Report Cards on Involvement." Education Week 20, no. 10: 1, 20-1.
42. Kearns, Kevin P. 1996. Managing for Accountability: Preserving the Public Trust in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43. Keller, Bess. 1999. "A Role for the Districts: They Can Make, or Break, Accountability." Education Week 18, no. 17: 41-4.
44. Kelley, Carolyn, Sharon Conley, and Steve Kimball. 2000. "Payment for Results: Effects of the Kentucky and Maryland Group-Based Performance Award Programs." Peabody Journal of Education 75(4):159-99.
45. Kidder, Tracy. 1981. The Soul of a New Machine. Boston: The Atlantic Monthly Press.
46. King, Richard A., and Judith K. Mathers. 1997. "Improving Schools through Performance-Based Accountability and Financial Rewards." Journal of Education Finance 23:147-76.
47. Kohn, Alfie. 1993. Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A's, Praise, and Other Bribes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
48. Kurtz, Michele. 1998. Teachers See Disincentive to Helping Low-rated Schools. The News and Observer (of Raleigh, N.C.), 18 February.
49. Kurtz, Michele. 1999. AISD Tried to Improve Dropout Rate Data: Subpoenaed Memos Show Districts Intense Effort to Avoid 'Low-performing' Status for Austin School. The Austin American-Statesman, 14 April.
50. Ladd, Helen F., ed. 1996. "Introduction." Pp. 1-19 in Helen F. Ladd, ed., Holding Schools Accountable: Performance-Based Reform in Education. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
51. Leithwood, Kenneth, and Lorna Earl. 2000. "Educational Accountability Effects: An International Perspective." Peabody Journal of Education 75(4):1-18.
52. Leithwood, Kenneth, and Doris Jantzi. 1999. "The Relative Effects of Principal and Teacher Sources of Leadership on Student Engagement with School." Educational Administration Quarterly 35, Supplemental:679-706.
53. Levinson, Harry. 1973. The Great Jackass Fallacy. Boston: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.
54. Manzo, Kathleen Kennedy. 1999. "Seeing a Payoff: North Carolina's Accountability Plan Has Put the State's Troubled Schools on the Path to Reform." Education Week 18, no. 17: 165, 200.
55. Martinez, Michelle M. 2002. District Fined for Altering Test Data: Austin School District Pleads No Contest to Tampering with TAAS Reports, Will Pay $5,000. The Austin American-Statesman, 9 January.
56. Maslow, A.H. 1943. "A Theory of Human Motivation." Psychological Review 50:370-96.
57. Meyer, Lori, Greg F. Orlofsky, Ronald A. Skinner, and Scott Spicer. 2002. "The State of the States." Education Week 21, no. 17: 68-92.
58. Meyer, Robert H. 1996. "Value-Added Indicators of School Performance." Pp. 197-223 in Eric A. Hanushek and Dale W. Jorgenson, eds., Improving America's Schools: The Role of Incentives. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
59. Miller, Beth. 1999. Teachers Union Flexes Muscles: When DSEA Talks - and It Knows the Talk - Lawmakers Listen. The News Journal (of Wilmington, Del.), 15 March.
60. Mullis, Ina V.S., Michael O. Martin, Eugenio J. Gonzalez, Kelvin D. Gregory, Robert A. Garden, Kathleen M. O'Connor, Steven J. Chrostowski, and Teresa A. Smith. 2000. TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report. Chestnut Hill, Mass.: Boston College, Lynch School of Education, The International Study Center.
61. Murnane, Richard J. 1987. "Improving Education Indicators and Economic Indicators: The Same Problems?" Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9:101-16.
62. National Association of State Boards of Education. 1999. Non Pass, No Play: Eligibility Requirements for Extracurricular Activities. Policy Update 7, no. 12 (June). Alexandria, Va.: Policy Information Clearinghouse, National Association of State Boards of Education.
63. New Haven Public Schools. 2001. Greater Achievement through Shared Accountability Task Force Report, 11 June [cited 18 November 2002]. Available at http://www.nhps.net/pdf/NHPSReport_June11_2001.pdf, Internet.
64. Ogawa, Rodney T., and Ed Collom. 2000. "Using Performance Indicators to Hold Schools Accountable: Implicit Assumptions and Inherent Tensions." Peabody Journal of Education 75(4):200-15.
65. Olson, Lynn. 1999a. "Shining a Spotlight on Results." Education Week 18, no. 17: 8-10.
66. Olson, Lynn. 1999b. "Demand for Principals Growing, but Candidates Aren't Applying." Education Week 18, no. 25: 1, 20-2.
67. Olson, Lynn. 2000. "Sweetening the Pot." Education Week 19, no. 18: 28-30.
68. Portner, Jessica. 1999. "Reality Strikes: After Much Debate, Virginia's Students Start Taking the State's New Exit Exams." Education Week 18, no. 17: 181.
69. Public Agenda. 1999. Playing Their Parts: What Parents and Teachers Really Mean by Parental Involvement in Public Schools. New York: Public Agenda. See also http://www.publicagenda.org/specials/parent/parent.htm, Internet.
70. Reid, Karla Scoon. 2001. "New Haven Accountability Plan Targets Parents." Education Week 21, no. 7: 5.
71. Riordon, William L. 1963. Plunkitt of Tammany Hall: A Series of Very Plain Talks on Very Practical Politics. New York: E. P. Dutton.
72. Robinson, Viviane, and Helen Timperley. 2000. "The Link between Accountability and Improvement: The Case of Reporting to Parents." Peabody Journal of Education 75(4):66-89.
73. Roderick, Melissa, and Mimi Engle. 2001. "The Grasshopper and the Ant: Motivational Responses of Low-Achieving Students to High-Stakes Testing." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23:197-227.
74. Rogosa, David. 1999. How Accurate Are the STAR National Percentile Rank Scores for Individual Students? An Interpretive Guide. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University.
75. Rosenthal, Stephen R. 1989. "Producing Results in Government: Moving beyond Project Management and Its Limited View of Success." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8:110-6.
76. Samuels, Christina A. 1999. Some in Va. Rejecting Student Teachers. The Washington Post, 20 February.
77. Samuelson, Robert J. 1999. Why I Am Not a Manager. Newsweek, 22 March, 47.
78. Sandham, Jessica L. 2001. "California." Education Week 20, no. 17: 115-6.
79. Schwartz, Robert. 2000. "School Accountability - An Elusive Policy Solution: The Israeli Experience in Comparative Perspective." Journal of Public Policy 20:195-218.
80. Simmons, Tim. 1999a. Focus on Reading Pays Off. The News and Observer (of Raleigh, N.C.), 5 March.
81. Simmons, Tim. 1999b. Death Knell Sounds for Social Promotion in N.C. Schools. The News and Observer (of Raleigh, N.C.), 1 April.
82. Strauss, Valerie. 1998. A School Attendance Plan for Parents. The Washington Post, 15 November.
83. Stricherz, Mark. 2001. "Getting Its Wish." Education Week 21, no. 13: 18.
84. Viadero, Debra. 2002. "Researcher Skewers Explanations behind Teacher Shortage." Education Week 21, no. 30:7.
85. Wainer, Howard. 1993. "Measurement Problems." Journal of Education Measurement 30:1-21.
86. Walton, Mary. 1986. The Deming Management Method. New York: Dodd, Mead.
87. Watts, James A., Gale Gaines, and Joseph Creech. 1998. Getting Results: A Fresh Look at School Accountability. Atlanta: Southern Regional Education Board.
88. White, Kerry A. 1998. "Florida's 'List of Shame'Shrinks As Legislators Hail Improvement." Education Week 17, no. 35: 18.
89. Womack, James P., Daniel T. Jones, and Daniel Roos. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production. New York: Rawson Associates.
90. Zielbauer, Paul. 2001. In New Haven, Report Calls for Making Education Everybody's Business. The New York Times, 2 September.