An efficient branch-and-bound algorithm for the assignment of protein backbone NMR peaks

Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Bioinformatics Conference, CSB 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 165-174

  Lin, Guohui ^a   Xu, Dong ^b   Chen, Zhi Zhong ^c   Jiang, Tao ^d   Wen, Jianjun ^d   Xu, Ying ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c TOKYO DENKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d University of California Riverside   (United States)

Author keywords

"greedy" algorithm; bipartite matching; branch and bound; chemical shift; combinatorial technique; NMR; peak assignment; protein structure

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BRANCH AND BOUND METHOD; CHEMICAL SHIFT; COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTEINS; RESONANCE;

BIPARTITE MATCHINGS; COMBINATORIAL TECHNIQUES; GREEDY ALGORITHMS; PEAK ASSIGNMENT; PROTEIN STRUCTURES;

BIOINFORMATICS;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 2442498884     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSB.2002.1039339     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. A. Bar-Noy, R. Bar-Yehuda, A. Freund, J. Naor, and B. Schieber. A unified approach to approximating resource allocation and scheduling. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'00), pages 735-744, 2000.
2. R. Bar-Yehuda and S. Even. A local-ratio theorem for approximating the weighted vertex cover problem. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 25:27-46, 1985.
3. C. Bartels, P. Güntert, M. Billeter, and K. Wüthrich. GARANT-A general algorithm for resonace assignment of multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. J. Comp. Chem., 18:139-149, 1996.
4. C. Bartels, T. Xia, M. Billerter, P. Güntert, and K. Wüthrich. The program XEASY for computer-supported NMR spectral analysis of biological macromolecules. J. Biomol. NMR, 5:1-10, 1995.
5. A. Bax and S. Grzesiek. Methodological advances in protein NMR. Acc. Chem. Res., 26:131-138, 1993.
6. R. Bernstein, C. Cieslar, A. Ross, H. Oschkinat, J. Freund, and T. A. Holak. Computer assisted assignment of multidimensional MMR-spectra of proteins: application to 3D NOESY-HMQC and TOCSY-HMQC spectra. J. Biomol. NMR, 3:245-251, 1993.
7. J. Cavanagh, W. J. Fairbrother, A. G. Palmer III, and N. J. Skelton. Protein NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Practice. Academic Press, San Diego, 1996.
8. Z.-Z. Chen, T. Jiang, G.-H. Lin, J. J. Wen, D. Xu, J. Xu, and Y. Xu. Approximation algorithms for NMR spectral peak assignment. Theoretical Computer Science, Feb, 2002. In press.
9. A. E. Ferentz and G. Wagner. NMR spectroscopy: a multifaceted approach to macromolecular structure. Quart. Rev. Biophys., 33:29-65, 2000.
10. A. V. Goldberg and R. Kennedy. An efficient cost scaling algorithm for the assignment problem. Mathematical Programming, 71, 1995.
11. W. Gronwald, R. F. Boyko, F. D. Sönnichsen, and D. S. Wishart. ORB, a homology-based program for the prediction of protein NMR chemical shifts. J. Biomol. NMR, 10:165-179, 1997.
12. P. Güntert, M. Salzmann, D. Braun, and K. Wüthrich. Sequence-specific NMR assignment of proteins by global fragment mapping with the program mapper. J. Biomol. NMR, 18:129-137, 2000.
13. D. T. Jones. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol., 292:195-202, 1999.
14. E. L. Lawler. Combinatorial Optimization: Networks and Matroids. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1976.
15. 15N)-labeled proteins. J. Biomol. NMR, 9:151, 1997.
16. H. N. B. Moseley and G. T. Montelione. Automated analysis of NMR assignments and structures for proteins. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol., 9:635-642, 1999.
17. National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Pilot projects for the protein structure initiative (structural genomics). http://www.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-GM-99-009.html, June:RFA GM-99-009, 1999.
18. University of Wisconsin. BioMagResBank. http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 2001.
19. E. C. van Geerestein-Ujah, M. Slijper, R. Boelens, and R. Kaptein. Graph-theoretical assignment of secondary structure in multidimensional protein NMR spectra: Application to the lac repressor headpiece. J. Biomol. NMR, 5:67-78, 1995.
20. M. P. Williamson and T. Asakura. Empirical comparisons of models for chemical-shift calculations in proteins. J. Mag. Res., B, 101:63-71, 1993.
21. K. Wüthrich. NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Wiley, New York, 1986.
22. 1H 2D NMR spectra. J. Mag. Reson., B, 103:53-58, 1994.
23. Y. Xu and D. Xu. Protein threading using PROSPECT: Design and evaluation. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet., 40:343-354, 2000.
24. Y. Xu, D. Xu, D. Kim, V. Olman, J. Razumovskaya, and T. Jiang. Automated assignment of backbone NMR peaks using constrained bipartite matching. IEEE Computing in Science & Engineering, 4:50-62, 2002.
25. D. E. Zimmerman, C. A. Kulikowski, Y. Huang, W. F. M. Tashiro, S. Shimotakahara, C. Chien, R. Powers, and G. T. Montelione. Automated analysis of protein NMR assignments using methods from artificial intelligence. J. Mol. Biol., 269:592-610, 1997.