Non-conventional non-linear two-node hybrid stress-strain curved beam elements

Finite Elements in Analysis and Design

Volumn 40, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1333-1359

  Kulikov, G M ^a   Plotnikova, S V ^a  

^a TAMBOV STATE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Finite deformations; Hybrid stress strain element; Large rigid body motions; Timoshenko beam

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DEFORMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; STIFFNESS; STRAIN; STRESS ANALYSIS;

FINITE DEFORMATIONS; HYBRID STRESS-STRAIN ELEMENTS; LARGE RIGID-BODY MOTIONS;

CURVED BEAMS AND GIRDERS;

EID: 2442494908     PISSN: 0168874X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2003.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Kim Y.H., Lee S.W. A solid element formulation for large deflection analysis of composite shell structures. Comput. Struct. 30:1988;269-274.
2. Simo J.C., Rifai M.S., Fox D.D. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part IV. Variable thickness shells with through-the-thickness stretching. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 81:1990;91-126.
3. Braun M., Bischoff M., Ramm E. Nonlinear shell formulations for complete three-dimensional constitutive laws including composites and laminates. Comput. Mech. 15:1994;1-18.
4. Parisch H. A continuum-based shell theory for non-linear applications. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 38:1995;1855-1883.
5. Park H.C., Cho C., Lee S.W. An efficient assumed strain element model with six dof per node for geometrically nonlinear shells. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 38:1995;4101-4122.
6. Betsch P., Stein E. An assumed strain approach avoiding artificial thickness straining for a nonlinear 4-node shell element. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 11:1995;899-909.
7. Betsch P., Gruttmann F., Stein E. A 4-node finite shell element for the implementation of general hyperelastic 3D-elasticity at finite strains. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 130:1996;57-79.
8. Hauptmann R., Schweizerhof K. A systematic development of 'solid-shell' element formulations for linear and non-linear analyses employing only displacement degrees of freedom. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 42:1998;49-69.
9. Kemp B.L., Cho C., Lee S.W. A four-node solid shell element formulation with assumed strain. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 43:1998;909-924.
10. Klinkel S., Gruttmann F., Wagner W. A continuum based three-dimensional shell element for laminated structures. Comput. Struct. 71:1999;43-62.
11. Sansour C., Kollmann F.G. Families of 4-node and 9-node finite elements for a finite deformation shell theory. An assessment of hybrid stress, hybrid strain and enhanced strain elements. Comput. Mech. 24:2000;435-447.
12. Sze K.Y., Lo S.H., Yao L.Q. Hybrid-stress solid elements for shell structures based upon a modified variational functional. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 53:2002;2617-2642.
13. Sze K.Y., Chan W.K., Pian T.H.H. An eight-node hybrid-stress solid-shell element for geometric non-linear analysis of elastic shells. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 55:2002;853-878.
14. Ahmad S., Irons B.M., Zienkiewicz O.C. Analysis of thick and thin shell structures by curved shell elements. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2:1970;419-451.
15. Sze K.Y. Three-dimensional continuum finite element models for plate/shell analysis. Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. 4:2002;400-407.
16. Kulikov G.M., Plotnikova S.V. Comparative analysis of two algorithms for numerical solution of nonlinear static problems for multilayered anisotropic shells of revolution. 2. Account of transverse compression. Mech. Compos. Mater. 35:1999;293-300.
17. Kulikov G.M., Plotnikova S.V. Finite element formulation of straight composite beams undergoing finite rotations. Trans. Tambov State Tech. Univ. 7:2001;617-633.
18. Kulikov G.M., Plotnikova S.V. Investigation of locally loaded multilayered shells by a mixed finite-element method. 2. Geometrically nonlinear statement. Mech. Compos. Mater. 38:2002;539-546.
19. Kulikov G.M., Plotnikova S.V. Non-linear strain-displacement equations exactly representing large rigid-body motions. Part I. Timoshenko-Mindlin shell theory. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 192:2003;851-875.
20. Kulikov G.M., Plotnikova S.V. Finite deformation plate theory and large rigid-body motions. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 39:2004;1093-1109.
21. Wempner G., Talaslidis D., Hwang C.M. A simple and efficient approximation of shells via finite quadrilateral elements. J. Appl. Mech. 49:1982;115-120.
22. Sze K.Y., Yi S., Tay M.H. An explicit hybrid stabilized eighteen-node solid element for thin shell analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 40:1997;1839-1856.
23. Kulikov G.M. Analysis of initially stressed multilayered shells. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38:2001;4535-4555.
24. Kulikov G.M. Non-linear analysis of multilayered shells under initial stress. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 36:2001;323-334.
25. Grigolyuk E.I., Kulikov G.M. Multilayered Reinforced Shells: Analysis of Pneumatic Tires. 1988;Mashinostroyenie, Moscow. (in Russian).
26. Washizu K. Variational Methods in Elasticity and Plasticity. 1982;Pergamon Press, Oxford.
27. Kulikov G.M., Plotnikova S.V. Simple and effective elements based upon Timoshenko-Mindlin shell theory. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191:2002;1173-1187.
28. Hughes T.J.R., Tezduyar T.E. Finite elements based upon Mindlin plate theory with particular reference to the four-node bilinear isoparametric element. J. Appl. Mech. 48:1981;587-596.
29. MacNeal R.H. Derivation of element stiffness matrices by assumed strain distributions. Nucl. Eng. Design. 70:1982;3-12.
30. Bathe K.J., Dvorkin E.N. A formulation of general shell elements - the use of mixed interpolation of tensorial components. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 22:1986;697-722.
31. Lee S.W., Pian T.H.H. Improvement of plate and shell finite element by mixed formulations. AIAA J. 16:1978;29-34.
32. Cho C., Lee S.W. On the assumed strain formulation for geometrically nonlinear analysis. Finite Elements Anal. Design. 24:1996;31-47.
33. Crivelli L.A., et al. A three-dimensional non-linear Timoshenko beam based on the core-congruental formulation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 36:1993;3647-3673.
34. Li M. The finite deformation theory for beam, plate and shell. Part I. The two-dimensional beam theory. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 146:1997;53-63.
35. Li M., Zhan F. The finite deformation theory for beam, plate and shell. Part IV. The FE formulation of Mindlin plate and shell based on Green-Lagrangian strain. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 182:2000;187-203.
36. Bathe K.J., Bolourchi S. Large displacement analysis of three-dimensional beam structures. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 14:1979;961-986.
37. Cardona A., Geradin M. A beam finite element non-linear theory with finite rotation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 26:1988;2403-2438.
38. Crisfield M.A. A consistent co-rotational formulation for non-linear three-dimensional beam elements. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 81:1990;131-150.
39. Simo J.C., Vu-Quoc L. A three-dimensional finite strain rod model. Part II. Computational aspects. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 58:1986;79-116.
40. Li M. The finite deformation theory for beam, plate and shell. Part III. The three-dimensional beam theory and the FE formulation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 162:1998;287-300.
41. Horrigmoe G., Bergan P.G. Nonlinear analysis of free-form shells by flat finite elements. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 16:1978;11-35.