Meta-scientific criticisms, curriculum innovation and the propagation of scientific culture

Journal of Curriculum Studies

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-15

  Solomon, Joan ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442455220     PISSN: 00220272     EISSN: 13665839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002202799183269     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bader, R. (1993) Science and culture in Germany: is there a case? In J. Durant and J. Gregory (eds), Science and Culture in Europe (London: Science Museum).
2. Bernstein, B. (1975) Class, Codesand Control (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
3. Bernstein, R. (1991) The New Constellation (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
4. Carlgren, I. (1995) National Curriculum as social compromise or discursive politics? some reflections on a curriculum-making process. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(4), 411-430.
5. Dawkins, R. (1989) The Selfish Gene (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
6. DeBoer, G (1991) A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice (New York: Teachers College Press).
7. de COndorcet (1990) L’Instruction publique en France pendant la Revolution (Paris: Klincksieck).
8. de Gnnes, P.-G. and Badoz, J. (1994) Les Objets Fragiles (Paris: Librairie Plon).
9. Dtchfield, C, Hornsby, J., Thompson, J. and West, R. (1985) The SSCR: an interactive and evolving model. School Science Review, 66 (237), 628-633.
10. Englund, T (1986) Curriculum as Political Problem: Changing Educational Conceptions, with Reference to Citizen Education. Uppsala Studies in Education, 25 (Uppsala & Lund: Studentlitteratur/Chartwell-Bratt).
11. Englund, T (1997) Towards a dynamic analysis of the content of schooling: narrow and broad didactics in Sweden. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29 (3), 267-287.
12. Gddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press).
13. Hogben, L (1938) Science for the Citizen (London: George Allen & Unwin).
14. Holton, G (1992) How to think about the anti-science phenomenon. Public Understanding of Science, 1(1), 103-128.
15. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S- (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Beverley Hills, CA: Sage).
16. Mdgley, M (1997) Visions of embattled science. In R. Levinson and J. Thomas (eds), Science Today (London: Routledge), 35-50.
17. Millar, R. (1996) Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77 (280), 7-18.
18. Roberts, D (1980) Theory, curriculum development, and the unique events of practice. In H. Munby, G. Orpwood and T. Russell (eds), Seeing Curriculum in a New Light (Toronto: OlSE Press), 65-87.
19. Rorty, R. (1989) Contingency, Irony and Solidarity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
20. Rorty, R. (1991) Objectivity, Relativism and Truth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
21. Schon, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
22. Shamos, M (1995) The Myth of Scientific Literacy (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).
23. Skilbeck, M (1982) Three educational ideologies. In T. Horton and P. Raggatt (eds), Challenge and Change in the Curriculum (Milton Keynes: Open University Press), 7-19.
24. Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scott, L and McCarthy, S. (1992) Teaching about the nature of science through history: action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in the Classroom, 29 (4), 409-421.
25. Werskey, G (1978) The Visible College (London: Penguin).
26. Wolpert, L (1997) In praise of science. In R. Levinson and J. Thomas (eds), Science Today (London: Routledge), 1-21.