Effects of spatial arrangement of visual stimulus on inverted self-motion perception induced by the foreground motion: Examination of OKN-suppression hypothesis

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 16, 2004, Pages 1951-1960

  Nakamura, Shinji ^a,b  

^a NIHON FUKUSHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Eye movement; Foreground; Self motion; Vection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; NYSTAGMUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; AWARENESS; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; NYSTAGMUS, PHYSIOLOGIC; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 2442430490     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barnes G.R., Hill T. The influence of display characteristics on active pursuit and passively induced eye movements. Experimental Brain Research. 56:1984;438-447
2. Berthoz A., Pavard B., Young L.R. Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (Linear vection). Basic characteristics and visual vestibular interactions. Experimental Brain Research. 23:1975;471-489
3. Brandt T., Dichgans J., Koenig E. Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Experimental Brain Research. 16:1973;476-491
4. Brandt T., Wist E.R., Dichgans J. Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation. Perception and Psychophysics. 17:1975;497-503
5. Duffy C.J., Wurtz R.H. An illusory transformation of optic flow fields. Vision Research. 33:1993;1481-1490
6. Duffy C.J., Wurtz R.H. Mechanisms of the illusory transformation of optic flow fields. Vision Research. 35:1995;985
7. Fischer M.H., Kornmüller A.E. Optokinetic ausgelöste Bewegungswahrnehmungen und optokinetisher Nystagmus. Journal für Psychogie und Neurologie (Leipzig). 41:1930;273-308
8. Gogel W.C., Koslow M. The adjacency principle and induced movement. Perception and Psychophysics. 11:1972;309-314
9. Gogel W.C., MacCracken P.J. Depth adjacency and induced motion. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 48:1979;343-350
10. Gogel W.C., Tietz J.D. Adjacency and attention as determiners of perceived motion. Vision Research. 16:1976;839-845
11. Grigo A., Lappe M. Interaction of stereo vision and optic flow processing revealed by an illusory stimulus. Vision Research. 38:1998;281-290
12. Howard I.P., Gonzalez E.G. Human optokinetic nystagmus in response to moving binocular disparate stimuli. Vision Research. 27:1987;1807-1816
13. Howard I.P., Heckman T. Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances, and positions of two competing visual displays. Perception. 18:1989;657-665
14. Howard I.P., Howard A. Vection: The contributions of absolute and relative visual motion. Perception. 23:1994;1627-1641
15. Howard I.P., Ohmi M. The efficiency of the central and peripheral retina in driving human optokinetic nystagmus. Vision Research. 24:1984;969-976
16. Howard I.P., Simpson W.A. Human optokinetic nystagmus is linked to the stereoscopic system. Experimental Brain Research. 78:1989;309-314
17. Johanson G. Studies on visual perception of locomotion. Perception. 6:1977;365-376
18. Lappe M., Rauschecker J.P. An illusory transformation in a model of optic flow processing. Vision Research. 35:1995;1619-1631
19. Loomis J.M., Nakayama K. A velocity analogue of brightness contrast. Perception. 2:1973;425-428
20. Meese T.M., Smith V., Harris M.G. Induced motion may account for the illusory transformation of optic flow fields found by Duffy and Wurtz. Vision Research. 35:1995;981-984
21. Nakamura S. The perception of self-motion induced by central and peripheral visual stimuli moving in opposite directions. Japanese Psychological Research. 43:2001;113-120
22. Nakamura S., Shimojo S. Stimulus size and eccentricity in visually induced perception of horizontally translational self-motion. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 87:1998;659-663
23. Nakamura S., Shimojo S. The critical role of the foreground stimuli in perceiving visually induced self-motion (vection). Perception. 28:1999;893-902
24. Nakamura S., Shimojo S. A slowly moving foreground can capture an observer's self-motion - A report of a new motion illusion; inverted vection. Vision Research. 40:2000;2915-2923
25. Nakamura S., Shimojo S. Sustained deviation of gaze direction can affect "inverted vection" induced by the foreground motion. Vision Research. 43:2003;745-749
26. Ohmi M., Howard I.P. Effect of stationary objects on illusory forward self-motion induced by a looming display. Perception. 17:1988;5-12
27. Ohmi M., Howard I.P., Landolt J.P. Circular vection as a function of foreground-background relationships. Perception. 16:1987;17-22
28. Pack C., Mingolla E. Global induced motion and visual stability in an optic flow illusion. Vision Research. 38:1998;3083-3093
29. Post R.B. Induced motion considered as a visually induced oculogyral illusion. Perception. 15:1986;131-138
30. Post R.B. Circular vection is independent of stimulus eccentricity. Perception. 17:1988;737-744
31. Post R.B., Chaderjian M. The sum of induced and real motion is not a straight path. Perception and Psychophysics. 43:1988;121-124
32. Post R.B., Leibowitz H.W. A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception. Perception. 14:1985;631-643
33. Post R.B., Shupert C.L., Leibowitz H.W. Implications of OKN suppression by smooth pursuit for induced motion. Perception and Psychophysics. 36:1984;493-498
34. Royden C.S., Banks M.S., Crowell J.A. The perception of heading during eye movements. Nature. 360:1992;583-585
35. Royden C.S., Crowell J.A., Banks M.S. Estimating heading during eye movements. Vision Research. 34:1994;3197-3214
36. Royden C.S., Hildreth E.C. Human heading judgment in the presence of moving objects. Perception and Psychophysics. 58:1996;836-856
37. Van Die G., Collewijn H. Optokinetic nystagmus in man. Human Neurobiology. 1:1982;111-119
38. Van Die G., Collewijn H. Control of human optokinetic nystagmus by the central and peripheral retina; effects of partial visual field masking, scotopic vision and central retinal scotomata. Brain Research. 383:1986;185-194
39. Warren W.H. Self-Motion: Visual perception and visual control. Epstein W., Rogers S. Perception of space and motion. 1995;263-325 Academic Press, San Diego