Predictors of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 267-269

  Cameron, C A ^a   Roberts, C L ^a,b   Peat, B ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c WOMEN S AND CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Decision making; Predictors; Vaginal birth after cesarean section

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY; HUMAN; LABOR; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; ONSET AGE; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 2442428525     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Flamm B.L. Vaginal birth after cesarean and the New England Journal of Medicine: a strange controversy. Birth. 28:(4):2001;276-279
2. O'Connor A., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment of screening decisions. The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. 2003;Update Software, Oxford
3. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin. 1999
4. McMahon M.J., et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 335:(10):1996;689-695
5. Waterstone M., Bewley S., Wolfe C. Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. Br Med J. 322:(7294):2001;1089-1093. discussion 1093-1094